Cited by 913Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 290 of the 290 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind.

Open access

Abstract

Dual-process theories of the mind are ubiquitous in psychology. A central principle of these theories is that behavior is determined by the interplay of automatic and controlled processing. In this article, the authors examine individual differences in the capacity to control attention as a major contributor to differences in working memory capacity (WMC). The authors discuss the enormous implications of this individual difference for a host of dual-process theories in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. In addition, the authors propose several new areas of investigation that derive directly from applying the concept of WMC to dual-process theories of the mind.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553

Cites

290 of 290 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–290 of 290

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Baddeley, 1986, Working memory.
  2. Baddeley, 1974, Working memory., 47
  3. Bargh, 1999, The cognitive monster., 361
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768 · DOI
  5. Block, 1980, The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the origination of behavior., Vol. 13, 39
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Descartes, 1931, Meditations on first philosophy: The Philosophical works of Rene Descanes
  8. Fiske, 1989, Examining the role of intent: Toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice., 253
  9. Fiske, 1991, Social cognition.
  10. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317 · DOI
  11. Gilbert, 1995, Attribution and interpersonal perception., 126
  12. Gilbert, 1998, Ordinary personology., Vol. 2, 89
  13. LaBerge, 2000, Networks of attention., 711
  14. Luck, 2000, The operation of selective attention at multiple stages of processing: Evidence from human and monkey electrophysiology., 687
  15. Nelson, 2002, Extinction, inhibition, and emotional intelligence.
  16. Panksepp, 2000, Emotion as natural kinds within the mammalian brain., 137
  17. 10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.211 · DOI
  18. Rothbart, 1998, Temperament., Vol. 3, 105
  19. Rothbart, 1981, Development of individual differences in infant temperament., Vol. 1, 37
  20. Schober, 1998, Different kinds of conversational perspective-taking., 145
  21. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 913

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2004
Volume
130
Issue
4
Pages
553-573
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2133991911
Cited by
913
References
290
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 48
FWCI
34.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH064267, K02MH001981, F32-MH64267)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
working memory capacity, dual-process theory, individual differences, automatic and controlled processing, attentional control, cognitive control, personality psychology, social psychology, clinical psychology
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Motivation, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review