The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Abstract
Psychologists have worried about the distortions introduced into standardized personality measures by social desirability bias. Survey researchers have had similar concerns about the accuracy of survey reports about such topics as illicit drug use, abortion, and sexual behavior. The article reviews the research done by survey methodologists on reporting errors in surveys on sensitive topics, noting parallels and differences from the psychological literature on social desirability. The findings from the survey studies suggest that misreporting about sensitive topics is quite common and that it is largely situational. The extent of misreporting depends on whether the respondent has anything embarrassing to report and on design features of the survey. The survey evidence also indicates that misreporting on sensitive topics is a more or less motivated process in which respondents edit the information they report to avoid embarrassing themselves in the presence of an interviewer or to avoid repercussions from third parties.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Third, loneliness and our outcomes were measured based on self-reports, which may be prone to social desirability bias [40].”
From Predictors of chronic loneliness during adolescence: a population-based cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
The Psychology of Survey Response
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819322 · Cited by 4,734
Self-citationAt the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x · Cited by 4,021
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Warner, S. L. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · Cited by 3,261
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
Cook, C., Heath, F. M., & Thompson, R. L. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970934 · Cited by 2,520
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,003
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-TellingPreprint
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1996631 · Cited by 56
Ansoleaga, E., Ahumada, M., & Cruz, A. G. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16204039 · Cited by 52
Pickard, M. D., & Roster, C. A. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106197 · Cited by 52
The “Attitudinal Fallacy” Is a Fallacy
Vaisey, S. (2014) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114523395 · Cited by 52
Using the Predicted Responses from List Experiments as Explanatory Variables in Regression Models
Imai, K., Park, B., & Greene, K. F. (2014) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu017 · Cited by 53
Soulakova, J. N., & Crockett, L. J. (2016) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw273 · Cited by 52
Li, J., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2019) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124119882468 · Cited by 53
Examining Stress in Graduate Assistants
Mazzola, J. J., Walker, E. J., Shockley, K. M., & Spector, P. E. (2011) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689811402086 · Cited by 51
When and why randomized response techniques (fail to) elicit the truth
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Acquisti, A., & Vosgerau, J. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.004 · Cited by 55
Höglinger, M., Jann, B., & Diekmann, A. (2016) · Survey research methods · doi:10.18148/srm/2016.v10i3.6703 · Cited by 51
Rashidian, H., Hadji, M., Marzban, M., Gholipour, M., Rahimi‐Movaghar, A., Kamangar, F., Malekzadeh, R., Weiderpass, E., Rezaianzadeh, A., Moradi, A., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183017 · Cited by 51
The Impact of Laws on Norms Perceptions
Eisner, L., Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., & Spini, D. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220959176 · Cited by 60
Nieuwkerk, P. T., Boer, M. S., Prins, J. M., Locadia, M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2010) · Antiviral Therapy · doi:10.3851/imp1644 · Cited by 50
Charles, J. L. K., & Dattalo, P. (2018) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1080/01488376.2018.1479335 · Cited by 50
Sexual Identity and Behavior Among U.S. High School Students, 2005–2015
Phillips, G., Beach, L. B., Turner, B., Feinstein, B. A., Marro, R. L., Philbin, M. M., Salamanca, P., Felt, D., & Birkett, M. A. (2019) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-019-1404-y · Cited by 57
Sex, lies, and measurement: Consistency tests for indirect response survey methods
Chuang, E., Dupas, P., Huillery, E., & Seban, J. (2021) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102582 · Cited by 46
Martin, C. E., Vujanovic, A. A., Paulus, D. J., Bartlett, B., Gallagher, M. W., & Tran, J. K. (2017) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.01.002 · Cited by 49
The American Muslim voter: Community belonging and political participation
Ocampo, A. X., Dana, K., & Barreto, M. A. (2018) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.02.002 · Cited by 49
A Contingent Perspective on Pluralistic Ignorance: When the Attitudinal Object Matters
Eisner, L., Spini, D., & Sommet, N. (2019) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edz004 · Cited by 49
Endogenous Popularity: How Perceptions of Support Affect the Popularity of Authoritarian Regimes
Buckley, N., Marquardt, K. L., Reuter, O. J., & Tertytchnaya, K. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000618 · Cited by 49
Experiments to Reduce the Over-Reporting of Voting: A Pipeline to the Truth
Hanmer, M. J., Banks, A. J., & White, I. K. (2013) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpt027 · Cited by 49
Psychometric Evaluation of Kingston Caregiver Stress Scale
Sadak, T. I., Korpak, A. M., Wright, J., Lee, M. K., Noel, M. A., Buckwalter, K., & Soo Borson, B. (2017) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2017.1313349 · Cited by 54
Measurement bias in self-reports of offending: a systematic review of experiments
Gomes, H. S., Farrington, D. P., Maia, Â., & Krohn, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09379-w · Cited by 53
Item non-response in open-ended questions: Who does not answer on the meaning of left and right?
Scholz, E., & Zuell, C. (2012) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.07.006 · Cited by 49
A Language for the People?: Quantitative Indicators of Written dārija and āmmiyya in Cairo and Rabat
Kindt, K. T., & Kebede, T. A. (2017) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004346178_003 · Cited by 48
Audio, video, chat, email, or survey: How much does online interview mode matter?
Oates, M., Crichton, K., Cranor, L. F., Budwig, S., Weston, E. J. L., Bernagozzi, B. M., & Pagaduan, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263876 · Cited by 48
Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Lu, R., Liu, L., Wu, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, Z., & Yi, D. (2012) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2011-050295 · Cited by 48
Adverse childhood experiences and repeat induced abortion
Bleil, M. E., Adler, N. E., Pasch, L. A., Sternfeld, B., Pera, R. A. R., & Cedars, M. I. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.029 · Cited by 48
Shillington, A. M., Woodruff, S. I., Clapp, J. D., Reed, M. B., & Lemus, H. (2012) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/1067828x.2012.710026 · Cited by 48
Maikovich‐Fong, A. K., Jaffee, S. R., Odgers, C. L., & Gallop, R. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01201.x · Cited by 48
Vasco, C., Torres, B., Pacheco, P., & Griess, V. C. (2017) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.015 · Cited by 48
First-onset and persistence of suicidal ideation in university students: A one-year follow-up study
Blasco, M. J., Vilagut, G., Alayo, I., Almenara, J., Cebrià, A. I., Echeburúa, E., Gabilondo, A., Gili, M., Lagares, C., Piqueras, J. A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.035 · Cited by 57
“Let Me Show You How Nice I Am”: Impression Management as Bias in Empathic Responses
Sassenrath, C. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619884566 · Cited by 52
Testing mood-activated psychological markers for suicidal ideation
Cha, C. B., O'Connor, R. C., Kirtley, O., Cleare, S., Wetherall, K., Eschle, S., Tezanos, K. M., & Nock, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000358 · Cited by 47
Chandler, G. E., Kalmakis, K. A., Chiodo, L. M., & Helling, J. (2019) · Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association · doi:10.1177/1078390319886923 · Cited by 55
Ma, B., Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Lai, Y. L., Zhou, Z., & Bashir, M. F. (2021) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.3403 · Cited by 47
Seasonal Variation in Internet Keyword Searches: A Proxy Assessment of Sex Mating Behaviors
Markey, P. M., & Markey, C. N. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9996-5 · Cited by 46
On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques
Hoffmann, A., de Puiseau, B. W., Schmidt, A. F., & Musch, J. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0804-3 · Cited by 47
Sigvardsdotter, E., Nilsson, H., Malm, A., Tinghög, P., Gottvall, M., Vaez, M., & Saboonchi, F. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14101175 · Cited by 45
Mahedy, L., MacArthur, G. J., Hammerton, G., Edwards, A. C., Kendler, K. S., Macleod, J., Hickman, M., Moore, S., & Heron, J. (2018) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14280 · Cited by 46
Increasing Environmental Health Literacy through Contextual Learning in Communities at Risk
Davis, L. F., Ramírez‐Andreotta, M. D., McLain, J. E., Kilungo, A. P., Abrell, L. M., & Buxner, S. R. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15102203 · Cited by 47
Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cited by 48
Raude, J., & Setbon, M. (2008) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.10.009 · Cited by 47
Beyer, H., & Krumpal, I. (2010) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-010-0115-0 · Cited by 46
Rippon, D., Shepherd, J., Wakefield, S., Lee, A., & Pollet, T. V. (2022) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2022.2069695 · Cited by 57
The Effect of CATI Questions, Respondents, and Interviewers on Response Time
Olson, K. M., & Smyth, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smv021 · Cited by 46
on behalf of the UNIVERSAL study group., Blasco, M. J., Castellví, P., Almenara, J., Lagares, C., Roca, M., Sesé, A., Piqueras, J. A., Soto‐Sanz, V., Marín, J. R., et al. (2016) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0820-y · Cited by 52
Gecková, A. M., Babinská, I., Bobáková, D. F., Veselská, Z. D., Bosáková, L., Kolarčík, P., Jarčuška, P., Pella, D., & Halánová, M. (2014) · Central European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.21101/cejph.a3903 · Cited by 46
Vésteinsdóttir, V., Reips, U., Joinson, A., & Þórsdóttir, F. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.023 · Cited by 46
Hesse, C. L., & Pedersen, C. L. (2017) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-017-9413-2 · Cited by 48
Weise, J. C., & Trollor, J. N. (2017) · Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability · doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1310825 · Cited by 46
Prejudice against Women Leaders: Insights from an Indirect Questioning Approach
Hoffmann, A., & Musch, J. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0969-6 · Cited by 46
The (better than expected) consequences of asking sensitive questions
Hart, E., VanEpps, E. M., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.014 · Cited by 46
O’Hagan, J., Williamson, J., McGill, M., & Khamis, M. (2021) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar52148.2021.00036 · Cited by 46
Smedsland, S. K., Vandraas, K. F., Bøhn, S., Dahl, A. A., Kiserud, C. E., Brekke, M., Falk, R. S., & Reinertsen, K. V. (2022) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-022-06544-0 · Cited by 46
Applicants’ Self-Presentational Behavior
Jansen, A., König, C. J., Stadelmann, E. H., & Kleinmann, M. (2012) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000046 · Cited by 46
Watson‐Jones, D., Baisley, K. J., Weiss, H. A., Tanton, C., Changalucha, J. M., Everett, D., Chirwa, T. F., Ross, D. A., Clayton, T. C., & Hayes, R. (2009) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/qad.0b013e32831ef523 · Cited by 44
Hoffmann, A., & Musch, J. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0628-6 · Cited by 45
Prevalence and Correlates of Heterosexual Anal Intercourse Among Men and Women, 20 U.S. Cities
For the NHBS Study Group, Hess, K. L., DiNenno, E. A., Sionéan, C., Ivy, W., & Paz‐Bailey, G. (2016) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1295-z · Cited by 45
The crime of choice: abortion border crossings from Chile to Peru
Freeman, C. (2017) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1339020 · Cited by 45
Commuting time to work and behaviour-related health: a fixed-effect analysis
Halonen, J. I., Pulakka, A., Vahtera, J., Pentti, J., Lagström, H., Stenholm, S., & Hanson, L. L. M. (2019) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2019-106173 · Cited by 52
Simkiss, N. J., Gray, N. S., Dunne, C., & Snowden, R. J. (2021) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-021-02964-x · Cited by 49
Young people's overestimation of peer substance use: an exaggerated phenomenon?
Pape, H. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03680.x · Cited by 44
Evaluating digital piracy intentions on behaviors
Taylor, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876041211266404 · Cited by 44
Examining potential iatrogenic effects of viewing suicide and self-injury stimuli.
Cha, C. B., Glenn, J. J., Deming, C. A., D’Angelo, E. J., Hooley, J. M., Teachman, B. A., & Nock, M. K. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000280 · Cited by 44
On-line life history calendar and sensitive topics: A pilot study
Morselli, D., Berchtold, A., Granell, J.-C. S., & Berchtold, A. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.068 · Cited by 44
Feingold, D., Goor‐Aryeh, I., Brill, S., Delayahu, Y., & Lev‐Ran, S. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw134 · Cited by 44
Best Practice in Online Survey Research with Sensitive Topics
Kays, K. M., Keith, T. L., & Broughal, M. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3918-8.ch009 · Cited by 44
Simapivapan, P., Boltong, A. G., & Hodge, A. M. (2016) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.09.010 · Cited by 41
Honesty on student evaluations of teaching: effectiveness, purpose, and timing matter!
McClain, L. R., Gulbis, A., & Hays, D. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1350828 · Cited by 44
Testa, F., Russo, M. V., Cornwell, T. B., McDonald, A., & Reich, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.16.215 · Cited by 44
RRreg: An R Package for Correlation and Regression Analyses of Randomized Response Data
Heck, D. W., & Moshagen, M. (2018) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v085.i02 · Cited by 44
Measuring expectations of inflation: Effects of survey mode, wording, and opportunities to revise
de Bruin, W. B., van der Klaauw, W., van Rooij, M., Teppa, F., & de Vos, K. (2017) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 44
Petróczi, A., Nepusz, T., Cross, P., Taft, H. E., Shah, S. A. B., Deshmukh, N., Schaffer, J. R., Shane, M., Adesanwo, C., Barker, J., et al. (2011) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/1747-597x-6-20 · Cited by 44
Intra-EU Labour Migration and Support for the Norwegian Welfare State
Cappelen, C. W., & Midtbø, T. (2016) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcw025 · Cited by 48
Thomason, M. E., Palopoli, A. C., Jariwala, N. N., Werchan, D. M., Chen, A., Adhikari, S., Espinoza‐Heredia, C., Brito, N. H., & Trentacosta, C. J. (2021) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101000 · Cited by 43
Moshagen, M., Musch, J., & Erdfelder, E. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0144-2 · Cited by 43
Survey evidence on conditional norm enforcement
Traxler, C., & Winter, J. (2012) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2012.03.001 · Cited by 43
Hardin, M. C., Zhong, B., & Whiteside, E. (2009) · International Journal of Sport Communication · doi:10.1123/ijsc.2.3.319 · Cited by 43
Anti-doping and legitimacy: an international survey of elite athletes’ perceptions
Efverström, A., Ahmadi, N., Hoff, D., & Bäckström, Å. (2016) · International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics · doi:10.1080/19406940.2016.1170716 · Cited by 52
Using decision pathway surveys to inform climate engineering policy choices
Gregory, R., Satterfield, T. A., & Hasell, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508896113 · Cited by 46
Estimating the prevalence of food risk increasing behaviours in UK kitchens
Jones, A. K., Cross, P., Burton, M. P., Millman, C., O’Brien, S. J., & Rigby, D. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175816 · Cited by 43
Matherne, C. F., Ring, J. K., & Farmer, S. M. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9519-4 · Cited by 45
"What was that site doing with my Facebook password?"
Golla, M., Wei, M., Hainline, J., Filipe, L., Dürmuth, M., Redmiles, E. M., & Ur, B. (2018) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3243734.3243767 · Cited by 43
Cain, J. J., & Malcom, D. R. (2019) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe7136 · Cited by 46
Lamanna, C. A., Hachhethu, K., Chesterman, S., Singhal, G., Mwongela, B., Ngendo, M., Passeri, S., Farhikhtah, A., Kadiyala, S., Bauer, J.-M., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210050 · Cited by 44
Factorial surveys reveal social desirability bias over self-reported organic fruit consumption
Cerri, J., Testa, F., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2019) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-04-2018-0238 · Cited by 47
Measuring Treatment Motivation in Secure Juvenile Facilities
van der Helm, P. G., Wissink, I. B., Jongh, T. D., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2012) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x12443798 · Cited by 50
An overstated welcome: Brexit and intentionally masked anti-immigrant sentiment in the UK
Creighton, M. J., & Jamal, A. (2020) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2020.1791692 · Cited by 47
The use of ChatGPT for personality research: Administering questionnaires using generated personas
de Winter, J., Driessen, T., & Dodou, D. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112729 · Cited by 54
Happy Talk: Mode of Administration Effects on Subjective Well-Being
Dolan, P., & Kavetsos, G. (2015) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9642-8 · Cited by 43
An Experimental Validation Method for Questioning Techniques That Assess Sensitive Issues
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E., & Moritz, A. (2013) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000226 · Cited by 42
Studiendesign und Methodik des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurveys 2012
Kraus, L., Piontek, D., Pabst, A., & de Matos, E. G. (2013) · SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice · doi:10.1024/0939-5911.a000274 · Cited by 42
Zamarro, G., Cheng, A. A., Shakeel, M. D., & Hitt, C. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2017.11.005 · Cited by 43
Chesters, J., Smith, J., Cuervo, H., Laughland‐Booÿ, J., Wyn, J., Skrbiš, Z., & Woodman, D. (2018) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783318800767 · Cited by 44
van Velden, J. L., Wilson, K. A., Lindsey, P. A., McCallum, H. I., Moyo, B. H. Z., & Biggs, D. (2020) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-020-01944-4 · Cited by 45
Robinson, K., & Wilson, M. (2020) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000830 · Cited by 47
Wolter, F., Mayerl, J., Andersen, H. K., Wieland, T., & Junkermann, J. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221094749 · Cited by 42
The Implicit Association Test in Market Research: Potentials and Pitfalls
Gregg, A. P., & Klymowsky, J. (2013) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20630 · Cited by 42
Coffman, K. B., Coffman, L. C., & Ericson, K. M. M. (2013) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w19508 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Yan, Ting
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 859-883
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2080673930
- Cited by
- 3,057
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 279 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 233 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 198 · 2017: 199 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 157 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 137.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- sensitive questions, social desirability bias, misreporting, survey accuracy, error reporting, survey design, embarrassment, illicit drug use, sexual behavior, abortion, personality measures
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Social Desirability, Social Problems, Illicit Drugs, Bias, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review