The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Abstract
Psychologists have worried about the distortions introduced into standardized personality measures by social desirability bias. Survey researchers have had similar concerns about the accuracy of survey reports about such topics as illicit drug use, abortion, and sexual behavior. The article reviews the research done by survey methodologists on reporting errors in surveys on sensitive topics, noting parallels and differences from the psychological literature on social desirability. The findings from the survey studies suggest that misreporting about sensitive topics is quite common and that it is largely situational. The extent of misreporting depends on whether the respondent has anything embarrassing to report and on design features of the survey. The survey evidence also indicates that misreporting on sensitive topics is a more or less motivated process in which respondents edit the information they report to avoid embarrassing themselves in the presence of an interviewer or to avoid repercussions from third parties.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Third, loneliness and our outcomes were measured based on self-reports, which may be prone to social desirability bias [40].”
From Predictors of chronic loneliness during adolescence: a population-based cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
The Psychology of Survey Response
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819322 · Cited by 4,734
Self-citationAt the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x · Cited by 4,021
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Warner, S. L. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · Cited by 3,261
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
Cook, C., Heath, F. M., & Thompson, R. L. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970934 · Cited by 2,520
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research
Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0 · Cited by 3,371
Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Lee, S. (2008) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxn002 · Cited by 2,897
Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review
Krumpal, I. (2013) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 · Cited by 2,860
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2699 · Cited by 2,591
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611430953 · Cited by 2,239
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N. D., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/691697 · Cited by 1,566
Self-citationValidating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1416587112 · Cited by 1,344
Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn063 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationMerrick, M. T., Ford, D. C., Ports, K. A., & Guinn, A. S. (2018) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2537 · Cited by 1,189
Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies.
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032734 · Cited by 978
Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12081 · Cited by 951
Grant, B. F., Saha, T. D., Ruan, W. J., Goldstein, R. B., Chou, S. P., Jung, J., Zhang, H., Smith, S. M., Pickering, R. P., Huang, B., et al. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2132 · Cited by 877
Latkin, C. A., Edwards, C., Davey-Rothwell, M. A., & Tobin, K. E. (2017) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.005 · Cited by 865
Confusion can be beneficial for learning.
D'Mello, S. K., Lehman, B. A., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003 · Cited by 782
How Many Cancer Patients Use Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Horneber, M., Büschel, G., Dennert, G., Less, D., Ritter, E. J., & Zwahlen, M. (2011) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/1534735411423920 · Cited by 772
Nock, M. K., Prinstein, M. J., & Sterba, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016948 · Cited by 662
Testa, F., Boiral, O., & Iraldo, F. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2960-2 · Cited by 694
Controlling social desirability bias
Larson, R. B. (2018) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/1470785318805305 · Cited by 662
Statistical Analysis of List Experiments
Blair, G., & Imai, K. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr048 · Cited by 639
Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4 · Cited by 623
Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441 · Cited by 620
How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility
Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2286 · Cited by 619
Measuring the impact of programs that challenge the public stigma of mental illness
Corrigan, P. W., & Shapiro, J. R. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.004 · Cited by 616
Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique
Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp065 · Cited by 545
Dekkers, O. M., Vandenbroucke, J. P., Cevallos, M., Renehan, A. G., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2019) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002742 · Cited by 525
Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms
Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Vilhena, N. (2010) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.11.001 · Cited by 524
Political Consequences of the Carceral State
WEAVER, V. M., & LERMAN, A. E. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000456 · Cited by 506
Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua
Ocantos, E. A. G., de Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J., & Nickerson, D. W. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00540.x · Cited by 508
Casey, L. S., Reisner, S. L., Findling, M. G., Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., Sayde, J. M., & Miller, C. (2019) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13229 · Cited by 467
The frequencies and disparities of adverse childhood experiences in the U.S.
Giano, Z. D., Wheeler, D., & Hubach, R. D. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09411-z · Cited by 516
Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias
Brenner, P. S., & DeLamater, J. (2016) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272516628298 · Cited by 457
Adult Consequences of Late Adolescent Alcohol Consumption: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies
McCambridge, J., McAlaney, J., & Rowe, R. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000413 · Cited by 452
The cost of racial animus on a black candidate: Evidence using Google search data
Stephens-Davidowitz, S. I. (2014) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.010 · Cited by 443
The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies
Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2009) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x · Cited by 440
Strangers on a Plane: Context-Dependent Willingness to Divulge Sensitive Information
John, L. K., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/656423 · Cited by 414
Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis
Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0533-4 · Cited by 422
Salway, T. J., Bogaert, L., Rhodes, A. E., Brennan, D. J., & Gesink, D. (2016) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303088 · Cited by 456
What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum?
Glynn, A. (2013) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs070 · Cited by 413
Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. G. (2012) · Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge) · Cited by 400
Qualitative research interviews
Knox, S., & Burkard, A. W. (2009) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300802702105 · Cited by 371
Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., De Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199 · Cited by 444
The “World Café” as a Participatory Method for Collecting Qualitative Data
Löhr, K., Weinhardt, M., & Sieber, S. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920916976 · Cited by 392
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
Stevenson, M., Lloyd-Jones, M., Morgan, M. Y., & Wong, R. H. Y. (2012) · Cited by 359
Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of black Americans
Bleich, S. N., Findling, M. G., Casey, L. S., Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., SteelFisher, G. K., Sayde, J. M., & Miller, C. (2019) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13220 · Cited by 391
Reimers, S. J., Maylor, E. A., Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.026 · Cited by 362
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-08-2014-0267 · Cited by 365
"I regretted the minute I pressed share": a qualitative study of regrets on Facebook
Wang, Y., Norcie, G., Komanduri, S., Acquisti, A., Leon, P. G., & Cranor, L. F. (2011) · Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2078827.2078841 · Cited by 479
Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis
Dodou, D., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.005 · Cited by 325
Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence.
Major, B., Appelbaum, M. I., Beckman, L. J., Dutton, M. A., Russo, N. F., & West, C. M. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0017497 · Cited by 340
Ford, D. C., Merrick, M. T., Parks, S. E., Breiding, M. J., Gilbert, L. K., Edwards, V. J., Dhingra, S. S., Barile, J. P., & Thompson, W. W. (2014) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/a0037723 · Cited by 301
Childhood Disadvantage and Health Problems in Middle and Later Life
Ferraro, K. F., Schafer, M. H., & Wilkinson, L. R. (2015) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122415619617 · Cited by 305
Heerwegh, D. (2009) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn054 · Cited by 298
How to ask sensitive questions in conservation: A review of specialized questioning techniques
Nuño, A., & John, F. A. V. S. (2014) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.047 · Cited by 298
Elias, B., Mignone, J., Hall, M., Hong, S. P., Hart, L., & Sareen, J. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.026 · Cited by 293
Blair, G., Coppock, A., & Moor, M. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000374 · Cited by 299
Coffman, K. B., Coffman, L. C., & Ericson, K. M. M. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2503 · Cited by 287
Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?
Horiuchi, Y., Markovich, Z. D., & Yamamoto, T. (2021) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2021.30 · Cited by 286
Sexual Initiation, Contraceptive Use, and Pregnancy Among Young Adolescents
Finer, L. B., & Philbin, J. M. (2013) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3495 · Cited by 280
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Kirchner, T., & Shiffman, S. S. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118384404.ch20 · Cited by 288
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993647.010 · Cited by 279
Mustanski, B. S. (2011) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9745-1 · Cited by 274
Jaffee, S. R., & Maikovich‐Fong, A. K. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02304.x · Cited by 304
Coutts, E., & Jann, B. (2011) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124110390768 · Cited by 264
OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust
OECD (2017) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264278219-en · Cited by 256
The Impact of Relative Standards on the Propensity to Disclose
Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0215 · Cited by 247
Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad
Book, A. S., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016 · Cited by 258
Atheists and Other Cultural Outsiders: Moral Boundaries and the Non-Religious in the United States
Edgell, P., Hartmann, D., Stewart, E. M., & Gerteis, J. (2016) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sow063 · Cited by 261
An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions
Rosenfeld, B. R. M., Imai, K., & Shapiro, J. N. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12205 · Cited by 251
Alcohol-Attributable Cancer Deaths and Years of Potential Life Lost in the United States
Nelson, D. E., Jarman, D. W., Rehm, J. T., Greenfield, T. K., Rey, G., Kerr, W. C., Miller, P. E., Shield, K. D., Ye, Y., & Naimi, T. S. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.301199 · Cited by 249
Observer ratings: Validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research
Meagher, R. K. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026 · Cited by 264
Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa)
DiMaggio, P. (2015) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715602908 · Cited by 252
Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors
Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. (2010) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2010.56659889 · Cited by 224
Langhaug, L. F., Sherr, L., & Cowan, F. M. (2010) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02464.x · Cited by 220
Johnson, E. A., & O'Brien, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.9.939 · Cited by 263
Xie, Y., Wang, K., & Kong, Y. (2021) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00314-9 · Cited by 205
Using Twitter for Demographic and Social Science Research: Tools for Data Collection and Processing
McCormick, T. H., Lee, H. E., Cesare, N., Shojaie, A., & Spiro, E. S. (2015) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124115605339 · Cited by 207
Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2014.5 · Cited by 208
Police research, officer surveys, and response rates
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., Baek, H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2017.1394300 · Cited by 204
Hom, M. A., Joiner, T. E., & Bernert, R. A. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000241 · Cited by 203
Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys
Ulrich, R., Pope, H. G., Cléret, L., Petróczi, A., Nepusz, T., Schaffer, J. R., Kanayama, G., Comstock, R. D., & Simon, P. D. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4 · Cited by 200
Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviews
Vogl, S. (2013) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1177/0081175012465967 · Cited by 302
Li, D., Li, X., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Bao, Z., & Wen, F. (2013) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9761-9 · Cited by 201
Data Quality in PC and Mobile Web Surveys
Mavletova, A. (2013) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439313485201 · Cited by 196
Sources of Error in Substance Use Prevalence Surveys
Johnson, T. P. (2014) · International Scholarly Research Notices · doi:10.1155/2014/923290 · Cited by 187
Changes in American Adults’ Reported Same-Sex Sexual Experiences and Attitudes, 1973–2014
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2016) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0769-4 · Cited by 194
Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app
Munzert, S., Selb, P., Gohdes, A., Stoetzer, L. F., & Lowe, W. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01044-x · Cited by 190
Robinson-Cimpian, J. P. (2014) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x14534297 · Cited by 222
Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement
Schober, M. F., Josh Pasek, B., Guggenheim, L., Lampe, C. A. C., & Conrad, F. G. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfv048 · Cited by 201
Miles, A. (2015) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122415591800 · Cited by 190
Rethinking and Updating Demographic Questions: Guidance to Improve Descriptions of Research Samples
Hughes, J. L., Camden, A. A., & Yangchen, T. (2016) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn21.3.138 · Cited by 237
Testa, F., Gusmerotti, N. M., Corsini, F., Passetti, E., & Iraldo, F. (2015) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1382 · Cited by 191
Smith, S. M. R., Goldstein, R. B., & Grant, B. F. (2016) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.022 · Cited by 181
Ethnic Diversity, Segregation and Ethnocentric Trust in Africa
Robinson, A. L. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000540 · Cited by 182
Studer, J., Baggio, S., Mohler‐Kuo, M., Dermota, P., Gaume, J., Bertholet, N., Daeppen, J., & Gmel, G. E. (2013) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.029 · Cited by 176
Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., Lansford, J. E., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Tapanya, S., Tirado, L. M. U., Zelli, A., Alampay, L. P., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12084 · Cited by 172
Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects
Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00048.x · Cited by 181
Voter overrepresentation, vote misreporting, and turnout bias in postelection surveys
Selb, P., & Munzert, S. (2012) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.11.004 · Cited by 175
Pinto, R. J., Correia, L., & Maia, Â. (2014) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-014-9602-9 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Yan, Ting
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 859-883
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2080673930
- Cited by
- 3,057
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 279 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 233 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 198 · 2017: 199 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 157 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 137.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- sensitive questions, social desirability bias, misreporting, survey accuracy, error reporting, survey design, embarrassment, illicit drug use, sexual behavior, abortion, personality measures
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Social Desirability, Social Problems, Illicit Drugs, Bias, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review