The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Abstract
Psychologists have worried about the distortions introduced into standardized personality measures by social desirability bias. Survey researchers have had similar concerns about the accuracy of survey reports about such topics as illicit drug use, abortion, and sexual behavior. The article reviews the research done by survey methodologists on reporting errors in surveys on sensitive topics, noting parallels and differences from the psychological literature on social desirability. The findings from the survey studies suggest that misreporting about sensitive topics is quite common and that it is largely situational. The extent of misreporting depends on whether the respondent has anything embarrassing to report and on design features of the survey. The survey evidence also indicates that misreporting on sensitive topics is a more or less motivated process in which respondents edit the information they report to avoid embarrassing themselves in the presence of an interviewer or to avoid repercussions from third parties.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Third, loneliness and our outcomes were measured based on self-reports, which may be prone to social desirability bias [40].”
From Predictors of chronic loneliness during adolescence: a population-based cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
The Psychology of Survey Response
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819322 · Cited by 4,734
Self-citationAt the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x · Cited by 4,021
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Warner, S. L. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · Cited by 3,261
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
Cook, C., Heath, F. M., & Thompson, R. L. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970934 · Cited by 2,520
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,003
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., & Mitchell, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09363-4 · Cited by 41
The Effect of Rapport on Data Quality in Face-to-Face Interviews: Beneficial or Detrimental?
Horsfall, M., Eikelenboom, M., Draisma, S., & Smit, J. H. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182010858 · Cited by 41
Loughran, T. A., Paternoster, R., & Thomas, K. J. (2014) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9219-4 · Cited by 42
What Can Be Learned from Cross-National Comparisons of Data on Illegal Drugs?
Kilmer, B., Reuter, P., & Giommoni, L. (2015) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/681552 · Cited by 41
Kim, K. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.5116/ijme.5845.caec · Cited by 41
Experimental Comparison of PC Web, Smartphone Web, and Telephone Surveys in the New Technology Era
Lee, H., Kim, S., Couper, M. P., & Woo, Y. (2018) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439318756867 · Cited by 41
Redmiles, E. M., Zhu, Z., Kross, S., Kuchhal, D., Dumitraş, T., & Mazurek, M. L. (2018) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3243734.3243740 · Cited by 41
Červený, J., Krojerová-Prokešová, J., Kušta, T., & Koubek, P. (2018) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2018.11.002 · Cited by 41
Hirschtick, J. L., Mattingly, D. T., Cho, B., Arciniega, L. Z., Levy, D., Sánchez-Romero, L., Jeon, J., Land, S., Mistry, R., Meza, R., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/0890117120964065 · Cited by 34
Self-reported vs Directly Observed Face Mask Use in Kenya
Jakubowski, A., Egger, D. T., Nekesa, C., Lowe, L., Walker, M., & Miguel, E. A. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18830 · Cited by 41
Donor Misreporting: Conceptualizing Social Desirability Bias in Giving Surveys
Lee, Z., & Woodliffe, L. (2010) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9153-5 · Cited by 41
The Autocratic Trust Bias: Politically Sensitive Survey Items and Self-censorshipPreprint
Tannenberg, M. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2980727 · Cited by 36
Knies, G., & Meena Kumari, B. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11310-9 · Cited by 40
Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in the U.S. Military
Morral, A. R., Gore, K. L., Schell, T. L., Bicksler, B. A., Farris, C. A., Ghosh‐Dastidar, B., Jaycox, L. H., Kilpatrick, D. G., Kistler, S., Street, A. E., et al. (2015) · Cited by 40
From question-behaviour effects in trials to the social psychology of research participation
McCambridge, J. (2014) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.953527 · Cited by 46
Yoon, B., Lee, K.-H., Noh, S.-R., Ha, Y., Lee, Y., & Koo, K. (2013) · Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery · doi:10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.269 · Cited by 40
Messing, J. T., Flair, L. L., Cavanaugh, C. E., Kanga, M. R., & Campbell, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2012.686963 · Cited by 42
Rocks, T., Pelly, F. E., Slater, G., & Martin, L. A. (2016) · Nutrition & Dietetics · doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12298 · Cited by 45
Where is vote buying effective? Evidence from a list experiment in Kenya
Kramon, E. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.006 · Cited by 45
Determinants of health behavior inequalities: a cross-sectional study from Israel.
Bayram, T., & Donchin, M. (2018) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/day054 · Cited by 34
Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., Duffy, M. E., Rogers, M. L., Hanson, J. E., Gutierrez, P. M., & Joiner, T. E. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22776 · Cited by 41
Single-case experimental research designs.
Kazdin, A. E. (2015) · Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.). · doi:10.1037/14805-029 · Cited by 39
Is social desirability bias important for effective ethics research? A review of literature
Tan, H. C., Ho, J. A., Teoh, G. C., & Ng, S. I. (2021) · Asian Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s13520-021-00128-9 · Cited by 44
Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Survey Data Using Covariate Adjustment Models
Vannieuwenhuyze, J., Loosveldt, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2014) · Journal of Official Statistics · doi:10.2478/jos-2014-0001 · Cited by 39
Artificial Inflation or Deflation? Assessing the Item Count Technique in Comparative Surveys
de Jonge, C. P. K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9249-x · Cited by 39
Plagiarism in Student Papers: Prevalence Estimates Using Special Techniques for Sensitive Questions
Coutts, E., Jann, B., Krumpal, I., & Näher, A. (2011) · Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik · doi:10.1515/jbnst-2011-5-612 · Cited by 39
The future of face-to-face interviewing
Schober, M. F. (2018) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-06-2017-0033 · Cited by 39
Namara, M., Wilkinson, D., Caine, K. E., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2020) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.2478/popets-2020-0006 · Cited by 41
Chan, K.-Y., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Meslec, N. (2020) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.11.002 · Cited by 43
Bader, M., Horsten, L. K., Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., & Moshagen, M. (2021) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2021.1984931 · Cited by 43
How survey mode affects estimates of the prevalence of gambling harm: a multisurvey study
Sturgis, P., & Kuha, J. (2022) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.014 · Cited by 39
de Jong, M. G., Pieters, R. G. M., & Stremersch, S. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029394 · Cited by 41
Poverty not taste drives the consumption of protected species in Madagascar
Merson, S. D., Dollar, L. J., Johnson, P. J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2019) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01843-3 · Cited by 38
Panel Conditioning in the General Social Survey
Halpern-Manners, A., Warren, J. R., & Torche, F. (2014) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114532445 · Cited by 38
Thomas, A. S., Gavin, M. C., & Milfont, T. L. (2014) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.048 · Cited by 39
First Sexual Intercourse and Subsequent Regret in Three Developing Countries
Osorio, A., del Burgo, C. L., Carlos, S., Ruiz‐Canela, M., Delgado‐Rodríguez, M., & de Irala, J. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.07.012 · Cited by 38
Hedonic recall bias. Why you should not ask people how much they earn
Prati, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.002 · Cited by 40
Cultural cognition and climate change education in the U.S.: why consensus is not enough
Kunkle, K. A., & Monroe, M. C. (2018) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1465893 · Cited by 44
Orpana, H., Lang, J. J., Baxi, M., Halverson, J., Kozloff, N., Cahill, L. E., Alam, S., Patten, S. B., & MORRISON, H. I. (2018) · Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada · doi:10.24095/hpcdp.38.6.03 · Cited by 38
McCambridge, J., Wilson, A., Attia, J., Weaver, N., & Kypri, K. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.016 · Cited by 37
Assessing Perceived Discrimination as Reported by Black and White Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer
Sutton, A. L., Hagiwara, N., Perera, R. A., & Sheppard, V. B. (2020) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-020-00817-4 · Cited by 39
Fudurić, M., Varga, Á., Horvat, S., & Škare, V. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.033 · Cited by 38
Javaid, S. U., Joseph, G., Chellaraj, G., Andrés, L., Rajan, S. I., & Solotaroff, J. L. (2017) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8044 · Cited by 37
The influence of conversational agents on socially desirable responding
Schuetzler, R. M., Giboney, J. S., Grimes, G. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.038 · Cited by 37
Kocjan, G. Z., Lavtar, D., & Sočan, G. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01867-8 · Cited by 42
But What Will People Think?: Getting beyond Social Desirability Bias by Increasing Cognitive Load
Stodel, M. (2015) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/ijmr-2015-024 · Cited by 37
Victims’ Responses to Stalking
Podaná, Z., & Imríšková, R. (2014) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260514556764 · Cited by 37
Ostapczuk, M., & Musch, J. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.492067 · Cited by 37
Timol, F., Vawda, M. Y., Bhana, A., Moolman, B., Makoae, M., & Swartz, S. (2016) · SAHARA-J Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS · doi:10.1080/17290376.2016.1241188 · Cited by 37
Paulus, D. J., Vujanovic, A. A., Schuhmann, B. B., Smith, L. J., & Tran, J. K. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.011 · Cited by 39
Shirazi, T. N., Renfro, K. J., Lloyd, E. A., & Wallen, K. (2017) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1102-6 · Cited by 37
The relation between students’ justice experiences and their school refusal behavior
Donat, M., Gallschütz, C., & Dalbert, C. (2017) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9423-9 · Cited by 37
Dancing Pigs or Externalities?
Redmiles, E. M., Mazurek, M. L., & Dickerson, J. P. (2018) · ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) · doi:10.1145/3219166.3219185 · Cited by 42
Toward an Understanding of the Relationship Between Accounts and Action
Jerolmack, C., & Khan, S. (2014) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114523397 · Cited by 37
Just Blowing Smoke? Social Desirability and Reporting of Intentions to Quit Smoking
Persoskie, A., & Nelson, W. L. (2013) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt101 · Cited by 37
Determining Levels of Fecal Incontinence in the Community: A New Zealand Cross-Sectional Study
Sharma, A., Marshall, R. J., Macmillan, A. K., Merrie, A. E. H., Reid, P., & Bissett, I. P. (2011) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0b013e31822dd0f0 · Cited by 37
The Item Count Method for Sensitive Survey Questions: Modelling Criminal Behaviour
Kuha, J., & Jackson, J. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1111/rssc.12018 · Cited by 43
Engineering Information Disclosure
Chang, D., Krupka, E. L., Adar, E., & Acquisti, A. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858346 · Cited by 41
Marie, C., Lemery, D. J., Vendittelli, F., & Sauvant‐Rochat, M. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13121255 · Cited by 37
Gambling and problem gambling in Ontario
Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2013) · Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge) · Cited by 37
Predictors of chronic loneliness during adolescence: a population-based cohort study
Hosozawa, M., Cable, N., Yamasaki, S., Ando, S., Endo, K., Usami, S., Nakanishi, M., Niimura, J., Nakajima, N., Baba, K., et al. (2022) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-022-00545-z · Cited by 38
American Muslim Political Participation: Between Diversity and Cohesion
Chouhoud, Y., Dana, K., & Barreto, M. A. (2019) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s1755048318000858 · Cited by 36
Expressive Voting in Autocracies: A Theory of Non-Economic Participation with Evidence from Cameroon
Letsa, N. W. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719001002 · Cited by 36
Response Burden – Review and Conceptual Framework
Yan, T., & Williams, D. (2022) · Journal of Official Statistics · doi:10.2478/jos-2022-0041 · Cited by 48
Self-citationSurvey research in Russia: in the shadow of war
Rosenfeld, B. (2022) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2022.2151767 · Cited by 24
Economic, Health and Behavioural Consequences of Greater Gambling Availability
Badji, S., Black, N., & Johnston, D. W. (2023) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106285 · Cited by 36
Introduction to the measurement of psychological attributes
Sijtsma, K. (2011) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2011.03.019 · Cited by 36
Can Markets Make Citizens? School Vouchers, Political Tolerance, and Civic Engagement
Fleming, D. J., Mitchell, W. F., & McNally, M. (2014) · Journal of School Choice · doi:10.1080/15582159.2014.905397 · Cited by 36
Social Desirability and Undesirability Effects on Survey Response latencies
Andersen, H. K., & Mayerl, J. (2017) · Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique · doi:10.1177/0759106317710858 · Cited by 36
Canadian university students’ gendered attitudes toward plagiarism
Bokosmaty, S., Ehrich, J. F., Eady, M. J., & Bell, K. (2017) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2017.1359505 · Cited by 43
Koval, A. L., Kerr, D., & Bae, H. T. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2019.1599381 · Cited by 36
English, D., Carter, J. A., Bowleg, L., Malebranche, D. J., Talan, A. J., & Rendina, H. J. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113121 · Cited by 36
Tan, H. C., Ho, J. A., Kumarusamy, R., & Sambasivan, M. (2021) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/15562646211046091 · Cited by 46
Mayer, M. M., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261673 · Cited by 36
Problematic drinking and physiological responses among female college students
Wemm, S., Fanean, A. P., Baker, A., Blough, E. R., Mewaldt, S. P., & Bardi, M. (2013) · Alcohol · doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.12.006 · Cited by 37
Polyvictimization Across Social Contexts: Home, School, and Neighborhood Violence Exposure
Butcher, F., Holmes, M. R., Kretschmar, J. M., & Flannery, D. J. (2016) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854816662679 · Cited by 35
Subjective well-being and social desirability
Reisinger, J. (2022) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104745 · Cited by 41
Ye, M., Hessler, D., Ford, D., Benson, M., Koita, K., Bucci, M., Long, D., Harris, N. B., & Thakur, N. (2023) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-023-04163-2 · Cited by 35
Nutritional supplement use among fitness club participants in Tehran, Iran
Saeedi, P., Taib, M. N. M., Hazizi, A. S., Vafa, M., & Foroushani, A. R. (2012) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.011 · Cited by 39
Measurement Directiveness as a Cause of Response Bias
Brenner, P. S., & DeLamater, J. (2014) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114558630 · Cited by 35
Beyer, H., & Liebe, U. (2014) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.08.017 · Cited by 35
Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model
Heck, D. W., Hoffmann, A., & Moshagen, M. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8 · Cited by 35
Alcohol use among Norwegian students
Erevik, E. K., Pallesen, S., Vedaa, Ø., Andreassen, C. S., & Torsheim, T. (2017) · Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.1177/1455072517709918 · Cited by 35
Objectifying or Liberating? Investigation of the Effects of Sexting on Body Image
Liong, M., & Cheng, G. H. ‐. (2018) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1438576 · Cited by 35
Gießelmann, M., Hagen, M., & Schunck, R. (2018) · Advances in Life Course Research · doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2018.06.002 · Cited by 34
Bova, C. S., Aswani, S., Farthing, M., & Potts, W. M. (2018) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.06.017 · Cited by 35
Questions on honest responding
Vésteinsdóttir, V., Joinson, A., Reips, U., Daníelsdóttir, H. B., Þórarinsdóttir, E. Á., & Þórsdóttir, F. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1121-9 · Cited by 54
Park, C. S. (2019) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2019.1581627 · Cited by 43
Zuber, F., & Kaptein, M. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1920-y · Cited by 35
Measuring Sexual Victimization
Krebs, C. (2014) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838014521028 · Cited by 35
Crochard, A., Luyts, D., di Nicola, S., & Gonçalves, M. A. G. (2009) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.003 · Cited by 35
Kraay, A., & Murrell, P. (2016) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00536 · Cited by 35
Collecting Survey Data on Sensitive Topics: Substance Use
Gfroerer, J., & Kennet, J. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781118594629.ch17 · Cited by 35
Pearlman, W. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001253 · Cited by 42
Comparison of Three Modes for a Crime Victimization Survey
Laaksonen, S., & Heiskanen, M. (2014) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smu018 · Cited by 34
Modeling Motivated Misreports to Sensitive Survey Questions
Böckenholt, U. (2013) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9390-9 · Cited by 34
van Wel, J. H. P., Kinyua, J., van Nuijs, A. L. N., Salvatore, S., Bramness, J. G., Covaci, A., & Hal, G. F. V. (2016) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.003 · Cited by 34
Lassi, G., Taylor, A. E., Mahedy, L., Heron, J., Eisen, T. G., & Munafo, M. R. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.181133 · Cited by 34
Corrupted Estimates? Response Bias in Citizen Surveys on Corruption
Agerberg, M. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09630-5 · Cited by 37
Training Student Pharmacists in Suicide Awareness and Prevention
Willson, M. N., Robinson, J. D., McKeirnan, K. C., Akers, J. M., & Buchman, C. R. (2020) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe847813 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Yan, Ting
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 859-883
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2080673930
- Cited by
- 3,057
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 279 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 233 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 198 · 2017: 199 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 157 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 137.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- sensitive questions, social desirability bias, misreporting, survey accuracy, error reporting, survey design, embarrassment, illicit drug use, sexual behavior, abortion, personality measures
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Social Desirability, Social Problems, Illicit Drugs, Bias, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review