Cited by 2,247Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?

Abstract

It is assumed that people seek positive self-regard; that is, they are motivated to possess, enhance, and maintain positive self-views. The cross-cultural generalizability of such motivations was addressed by examining Japanese culture. Anthropological, sociological, and psychological analyses revealed that many elements of Japanese culture are incongruent with such motivations. Moreover, the empirical literature provides scant evidence for a need for positive self-regard among Japanese and indicates that a self-critical focus is more characteristic of Japanese. It is argued that the need for self-regard must be culturally variant because the constructions of self and regard themselves differ across cultures. The need for positive self-regard, as it is currently conceptualized, is not a universal, but rather is rooted in significant aspects of North American culture. Conventional interpretations of positive self-regard are too narrow to encompass the Japanese experience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.766

Cites

246 of 246 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 249 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 2,101–2,135 of 2,135

Metadata

Authors
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1999-10
Volume
106
Issue
4
Pages
766-794
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2076124583
Cited by
2,247
References
249
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 122 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 113
FWCI
51.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-esteem, self-criticism, cross-cultural generalizability, Japanese culture, self-construal, North American culture, self-view
MeSH terms
Cultural Characteristics, Humans, Japan, Motivation, North America, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review