The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism.
Abstract
Scores on cognitive tasks used in intelligence tests correlate positively with each other, that is, they display a positive manifold of correlations. The positive manifold is often explained by positing a dominant latent variable, the g factor, associated with a single quantitative cognitive or biological process or capacity. In this article, a new explanation of the positive manifold based on a dynamical model is proposed, in which reciprocal causation or mutualism plays a central role. It is shown that the positive manifold emerges purely by positive beneficial interactions between cognitive processes during development. A single underlying g factor plays no role in the model. The model offers explanations of important findings in intelligence research, such as the hierarchical factor structure of intelligence, the low predictability of intelligence from early childhood performance, the integration/differentiation effect, the increase in heritability of g, and the Jensen effect, and is consistent with current explanations of the Flynn effect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, as dynamic effects can amplify over developmental time44, they are nonetheless worth understanding and addressing with care.”
From Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“overall cognitive capacities including crystallized and fluid composites, despite there being distinctions between them, have modest associations with each other, and can be summarized by a higher-order common factor (general intelligence) (Lovden, Fratiglioni, Glymour, Lindenberger, & Tucker-Drob, 2020; Lubinski, 2004; van der Maas et al., 2006).”
From Early-Initiated Childhood Reading for Pleasure: Associations with Better Cognitive Performance, Mental Well-being and Brain Structure in Young Adolescence (2024) · cites this paper as van der Maas et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“The network approach is different; it does not assume an a priori structure of motivation factors.Instead, it uses the (bidirectional) partial correlations between variables in empirical data and in doing so clusters of variables which can be interpreted as constructs may emerge.”
From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as van der Maas et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Klitgaard, R. E., & Gardner, H. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324560 · Cited by 13,639
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,690
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
"General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412107 · Cited by 6,207
Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems
May, R. M. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691206912 · Cited by 5,229
Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies.
Hardin, G., & Diamond, J. M. (1997) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137390 · Cited by 4,983
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 999
Ben‐Eliyahu, A., & Zeidner, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.041 · Cited by 33
Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences.
Sachisthal, M. S. M., Jansen, B. R. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., Dalege, J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000327 · Cited by 32
Self-citationReynolds, M. R., Floyd, R. G., & Niileksela, C. R. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0034102 · Cited by 32
Does your Family Make You Smarter?: Nature, Nurture, and Human Autonomy
Flynn, J. R. (2016) · Cited by 32
Investigating the Utility of Fixed-margin Sampling in Network Psychometrics
Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., van Borkulo, C. D., Robinaugh, D. J., Marsman, M., Dalege, J., Rhemtulla, M., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1489771 · Cited by 33
Nguyen, T., Duncan, R. J., & Bailey, D. H. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.04.002 · Cited by 35
Decomposing the influence of mental processes on academic performance
Δημητρίου, Α., Makris, Ν., Tachmatzidis, D., Kazi, S., & Spanoudis, G. C. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101404 · Cited by 32
Comorbidity in borderline personality: understanding dynamics in development
Choate, A. M., Fatimah, H., & Bornovalova, M. A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.015 · Cited by 37
Mapping principal dimensions of prejudice in the United States.
Bergh, R., & Brandt, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000360 · Cited by 31
Wang, Y., Guan, H., Ma, L., Luo, J., Chu, C., Hu, M., Zhao, G., Men, W., Tan, S., Gao, J.-H., et al. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac206 · Cited by 32
College major choice and ability: Why is general ability not enough?
Bartolj, T., & Polanec, S. (2012) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.07.010 · Cited by 32
Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.9290 · Cited by 42
Maertens, R., Götz, F. M., Golino, H. F., Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Kyrychenko, Y., Kerr, J. R., Stieger, S., McClanahan, W. P., III, Drabot, K., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gk68h · Cited by 31
Measuring mental capacity: Thomson's Bonds model and Spearman's g-model compared
Bartholomew, D. J., Allerhand, M., & Deary, I. J. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.007 · Cited by 30
Network neuropsychology: The map and the territory
Ferguson, C. E. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.024 · Cited by 29
Personality, intelligence, and academic achievement: Charting their developmental interplay
Bardach, L., Hübner, N., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & von Stumm, S. (2023) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12810 · Cited by 38
Gernigon, C., Hartigh, R. J. R. D., Vallacher, R. R., & van Geert, P. L. C. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231187324 · Cited by 35
Developmental Delays in Children With ADHD
Dyck, M. J., & Piek, J. P. (2012) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054712441832 · Cited by 36
Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?
Kell, H. J., & Lang, J. W. B. (2017) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020013 · Cited by 31
Psychological features in obesity: A network analysis
Calugi, S., & Grave, R. D. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23190 · Cited by 28
Δημητρίου, Α., Golino, H. F., Spanoudis, G. C., Makris, Ν., & Greiff, S. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101562 · Cited by 29
DeYoung, C. G., & Blain, S. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.026 · Cited by 34
Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., Warreyn, P., Dewandeleer, J., & Baeyens, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240741 · Cited by 42
Statistical evidence in psychological networks
Huth, K. B. S., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Keetelaar, S., van Holst, R. J., & Marsman, M. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02314-2 · Cited by 33
Rosenström, T. H., Ystrøm, E., Torvik, F. A., Czajkowski, N. O., Gillespie, N. A., Aggen, S. H., Krueger, R. F., Kendler, K. S., & Reichborn‐Kjennerud, T. (2017) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-016-9833-z · Cited by 30
Littlefield, A. K., Lane, S. P., Gette, J. A., Watts, A. L., & Sher, K. J. (2020) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/per0000457 · Cited by 30
Hojjati, S. H., Abbas Babajani-feremi, A., & Initiative, T. A. D. N. (2022) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2021.769982 · Cited by 28
Generalized Prejudice: Lessons about social power, ideological conflict, and levels of abstraction
Bergh, R., & Brandt, M. J. (2022) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2022.2040140 · Cited by 27
Mind–culture interactions: How writing molds mental fluidity in early development
Kazi, S., Δημητρίου, Α., Spanoudis, G. C., Zhang, X. K., & Wang, Y. (2012) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.07.001 · Cited by 26
Reynolds, M. R. (2013) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000013 · Cited by 27
The biological basis of intelligence: Benchmark findings
Hilger, K., Spinath, F. M., Troche, S. J., & Schubert, A. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101665 · Cited by 24
Choate, A. M., Bornovalova, M. A., Hipwell, A. E., Chung, T. A., & Stepp, S. D. (2022) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579422000463 · Cited by 28
Ebrahimi, O. V., Bauer, D. J., Hoffart, A., & Johnson, S. U. (2022) · Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science · doi:10.1037/abn0000786 · Cited by 25
Regime-Switching Bivariate Dual Change Score Model
Chow, S., Grimm, K. J., Filteau, G., Dolan, C. V., & McArdle, J. J. (2013) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.787870 · Cited by 26
Self-citationBeautiful minds (i.e., brains) and the neural basis of intelligence
Haier, R. J., & Jung, R. E. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001380 · Cited by 49
Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model
Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2018) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-018-9610-4 · Cited by 25
Miller, H. E., & Simmering, V. R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.006 · Cited by 27
Math Garden: A new educational and scientific instrument
Straatemeier, M. (2014) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 25
Mõttus, R., Wood, D., Condon, D. M., Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Greiff, S., Johnson, W., Lukaszewski, A. W., et al. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hvk5p · Cited by 28
Multiple test batteries as predictors for pilot performance: A meta‐analytic investigation
ALMamari, K., & Traynor, A. (2019) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12258 · Cited by 26
A Minimal Theory of Creative Ability
Stevenson, C. E., Baas, M., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2021) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence9010009 · Cited by 34
Palmer, C. E., Zhao, W., Loughnan, R. J., Zou, J., Fan, C. C., Thompson, W. K., Dale, A. M., & Jernigan, T. L. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab054 · Cited by 29
Kahl, T., Segerer, R. K., Grob, A., & Möhring, W. (2022) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101149 · Cited by 29
A model and its fit lie in the eye of the beholder: Long live the sum score
Edelsbrunner, P. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986767 · Cited by 25
Penke, L., Borsboom, D., Johnson, W., Kievit, R., Ploeger, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0024626 · Cited by 25
Self-citationWhat kind of kind is intelligence?
Serpico, D. (2017) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1401706 · Cited by 24
Trapp, S., Blömeke, S., & Ziegler, M. D. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.01.009 · Cited by 25
Lebedev, A. V., Nilsson, J., & Lövdén, M. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01260 · Cited by 21
Age-related nuances in knowledge assessment
Schroeders, U., Watrin, L., & Wilhelm, O. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101526 · Cited by 26
Birney, D. P., & Beckmann, J. F. (2022) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence10030049 · Cited by 32
Schroeders, U., Wilhelm, O., & Bucholtz, N. (2010) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.003 · Cited by 30
Banjac, S., Roger, É., Pichat, C., Cousin, É., Mosca, C., Lamalle, L., Krainik, A., Kahane, P., & Baciu, M. V. (2021) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102702 · Cited by 24
Sauce, B., Wass, C., Smith, A., Kwan, S. A., & Matzel, L. D. (2014) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2014.10.005 · Cited by 25
The impact of papers published in Intelligence 1977–2007 and an overview of the citation classics
Wicherts, J. M. (2009) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.06.004 · Cited by 23
Self-citationMurayama, K., & von Keyserlingk, L. (2025) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2025.2473894 · Cited by 40
Goring, S. A., Schmank, C. J., Kane, M. J., & Conway, A. R. A. (2021) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2021.104221 · Cited by 23
Reisenzein, R., Hildebrandt, A., & Weber, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.009 · Cited by 26
Continuity of Psychopathology Throughout Adolescence and Young Adulthood
Richards, J. S., Hartman, C. A., Ormel, J., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2022.2042695 · Cited by 23
Process-oriented intelligence research: A review from the cognitive perspective
Frischkorn, G. T., Wilhelm, O., & Oberauer, K. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101681 · Cited by 25
Formalizing psychological interventions through network control theory
Stocker, J. E., Koppe, G., Reich, H., Heshmati, S., Kittel‐Schneider, S., Hofmann, S. G., Hahn, T., van der Maas, H. L. J., Waldorp, L., & Jamalabadi, H. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40648-x · Cited by 24
Network Approach to Autistic Traits: Group and Subgroup Analyses of ADOS Item Scores
Anderson, G. M., Montazeri, F., & de Bildt, A. A. (2015) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2537-z · Cited by 24
Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Katherine, W. (2007) · Docs.school Publications · Cited by 23
Models of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Killeen, P. R. (2019) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2019.01.001 · Cited by 25
DeYoung, C. G., & Krueger, R. F. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1853462 · Cited by 26
Future directions for studying the evolution of general intelligence
Burkart, J. M., Schubiger, M. N., & van Schaik, C. P. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x17000024 · Cited by 28
Why the Item “23 +1” Is Not in a Depression Questionnaire: Validity From a Network Perspective
Cramer, A. O. J. (2012) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2012.681973 · Cited by 25
Hofman, A. D., Kievit, R., Stevenson, C. E., Molenaar, D., Visser, I., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xa2ft · Cited by 24
Don’t Use a Bifactor Model Unless You Believe the True Structure Is Bifactor
Decker, S. L. (2020) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282920977718 · Cited by 22
Conceptual engineering and operationalism in psychology
Vessonen, E. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03261-x · Cited by 22
Δημητρίου, Α., Mougi, A., Spanoudis, G. C., & Makris, N. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101602 · Cited by 24
Kovas, Y., Haworth, C., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. J. (2007) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00453.x · Cited by 22
Griffiths, S., Kievit, R., & Norbury, C. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13208 · Cited by 20
Epskamp, S., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Isvoranu, A., & van Borkulo, C. D. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003111238-8 · Cited by 21
Wood, D., Lowman, G. H., Harms, P. D., & Spain, S. M. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.002 · Cited by 21
Beyond quantitative and qualitative traits: three telling cases in the life sciences
Serpico, D. (2020) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-020-09750-6 · Cited by 22
Simpson-Kent, I. L., Fried, E. I., Akarca, D., Mareva, S., Bullmore, E. T., the CALM Team, & Kievit, R. (2021) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence9020032 · Cited by 26
Golino, H. F., Thiyagarajan, J. A., Sadana, R., Santos, M. T., Christensen, A. P., & Boker, S. M. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hj5mc · Cited by 22
Leveraging neuroscience for smarter approaches to workplace intelligence
Becker, W. J., Volk, S., & Ward, M. K. (2014) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.09.008 · Cited by 25
Murray, A. L., Booth, T., Eisner, M., Obsuth, I., & Ribeaud, D. (2018) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1468338 · Cited by 20
An attitude network analysis of post-national citizenship identities
Schlicht-Schmälzle, R., Chykina, V., & Schmälzle, R. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208241 · Cited by 20
A person‐centered approach in developmental science: Why this is the future and how to get there
van der Gaag, M. (2023) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2478 · Cited by 23
A critique of motivation constructs to explain higher-order behavior: We should unpack the black box
Murayama, K., & Jach, H. K. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24000025 · Cited by 32
Age-related effects on a hierarchical structure of canine cognition
Bognár, Z., Turcsán, B., Faragó, T., Szabó, D., Iotchev, I. B., & Enikö Kubinyi, B. (2024) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-024-01123-1 · Cited by 20
Early warning signals of complex critical transitions in deterministic dynamics
Evers, K. C., Borsboom, D., Fried, E. I., Hasselman, F., & Waldorp, L. (2024) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-024-10023-0 · Cited by 20
The epidemiology of cognitive development
Guez, A., Peyre, H., Williams, C. M., Labouret, G., & Ramus, F. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104690 · Cited by 28
Modeling Mind and Matter: Reductionism and Psychological Measurement in Cognitive Neuroscience
Kievit, R., Romeijn, J., Waldorp, L., Wicherts, J. M., Scholte, H. S., & Borsboom, D. (2011) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2011.567962 · Cited by 21
Self-citationThe Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes
Kell, H. J., & Lang, J. W. B. (2018) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence6030039 · Cited by 20
Leising, D., Borgstede, M., Burger, J., Zimmermann, J., Bäckström, M., Oltmanns, J. R., Freyer, N., Wiedenroth, A., Knischewski, P., & Connelly, B. S. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7c895 · Cited by 19
Science Self-Concept – More than the Sum of Its Parts?
Schroeders, U., & Jansen, M. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2020.1740967 · Cited by 22
Highways to happiness for autistic adults? Perceived causal relations among clinicians
Deserno, M. K., Borsboom, D., Begeer, S., van Bork, R., Hinne, M., & Geurts, H. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243298 · Cited by 19
Hannon, B. A. M., & Daneman, M. (2014) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.010 · Cited by 19
Spearman's hypothesis and Amerindians: A meta-analysis
Nijenhuis, J. T., van den Hoek, M., & Armstrong, E. L. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.006 · Cited by 18
Hsieh, F., Ferrer, E. E., Chen, S., Mauss, I. B., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2010) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9194-0 · Cited by 19
Biological Basis of Intelligence
Haier, R. J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.019 · Cited by 19
The EGA + GNM framework: An integrative approach to modelling behavioural syndromes
Martin, J. S., Massen, J. J. M., Šlipogor, V., Bugnyar, T., Jaeggi, A. V., & Koski, S. E. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13100 · Cited by 19
Bruton, O. J. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101540 · Cited by 20
Guerin, J. M., Wade, S. L., & Mano, Q. R. (2021) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2021.100153 · Cited by 26
Tzur-Bitan, D., Meiran, N., Steinberg, D. M., & Shahar, G. (2012) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2012.5.2.170 · Cited by 19
Möhring, A., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00028 · Cited by 23
Protzko, J., & Colom, R. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101581 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 842-861
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2100107646
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- general intelligence, dynamic modeling, mutualism, reciprocal causation, cognitive processes, hierarchical factor structure, heritability of intelligence, Flynn effect
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Intelligence, Models, Psychological, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review