The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Like many other forms of SRC in which participants respond to static symbolic stimuli (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995), imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“In sum, the evidence from these two experiments suggests that the processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility (e.g., DeJong et al., 1994;Tagliabue, Zorzi, Umilta, & Bassignani, 2000).”
From Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus–response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities (2012) · cites this paper as DeJong et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous interpretations (e.g., DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994;Wühr & Biebl, 2009), we surmise that responding to the stimulus cue opposite to the one that appears on the screen requires a logical recoding of the relevant stimulus and that this recoding carries-over to the irrelevant stimulus as well.”
From Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus–response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities (2012) · cites this paper as DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 823
Unconscious perception: The need for a paradigm shift
Holender, D., & Duscherer, K. (2004) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194980 · Cited by 91
“With respect to the objective threshold problem, none of the criticisms raised against the regression method (Dosher, 1998; Merikle & Reingold, 1998; Miller, 2000) can be overlooked, since none of them has been adequately rebutted thus far. Three rather straightforward remarks will dispense us to enter into the detail…”
BackgroundInfluentialDynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks
Burle, B., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440540000121 · Cited by 88
“On the other hand, when comparing the RT distributions without explicit SOA manipulation, the congruency effect in the Simon task (Simon, 1990) has been shown to decrease (Hommel, 1993; de Jong et al., 1994), and can even reverse (Burle et al., 2002) as poststimulus time increases.”
MethodResultDerbyshire, N., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2005) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.10.004 · Cited by 94
“latency increases. In sharp contrast the Simon EVect has been shown to decrease in size as response latency increases ( De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994 ).”
BackgroundTowards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects
Gevers, W., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2005) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440540000112 · Cited by 89
“These assumptions constitute the core of any multiple route architecture now commonly accepted to account for congruency effects such as the Simon task (de Jong et al., 1994; Kornblum et al., 1990).”
BackgroundResultDissociating Stimulus-Stimulus and Response-Response Effects in the Stroop Task.
Schmidt, J. R., & Cheesman, J. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/h0087468 · Cited by 90
“Other researchers (De Jong et al., 1994; Kornblum et al., 1999) have found RR effects using left-or-right key press responses that combined a spatial location distracter manipulation.”
BackgroundTemporal and spectral profiles of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response conflict processing
Wang, K., Li, Q., Zheng, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, X. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.045 · Cited by 85
“Another commonly used behavioral method was the distributional analysis, in which participants’ RTs were grouped into bins according to values, then RTs of different bins were compared between compatible and incompatible conditions (De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1997; Kornblum et al., 1999).”
MethodInfluentialInteracting sources of interference during sensorimotor integration processes
Mückschel, M., Stock, A.-K., Dippel, G., Chmielewski, W., & Beste, C. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.075 · Cited by 88
“With respect to the dual-process account of interference effects (De Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof et al., 1995) and furthermore assuming that Flanker interference is mediated via the conditional pathway while Simon interference is mediated via the unconditional pathway (Mansfield et al., 2013),…”
BackgroundResultRidderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., & Bashore, T. R. (1995) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00031-o · Cited by 88
“This scheme is in accordance with other dual-process models that propose direct response priming effecs of distractors or directional cues in parallel to concurrent centra1 response selection or memory search processes (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994; Eriksen et al., 1986; Smid et al., 1991).”
ResultJepma, M., Wagenmakers, E., Band, G. P. H., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21063 · Cited by 87
“The resulting delta plot provides a way of zooming in on the AS effect at different points of the RT distribution (eg, Ridderinkhof, 2002 ; De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994 ).”
Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes
Schwarz, W., & Miller, J. O. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0254-6 · Cited by 87
“In summary, our results confirm previous conclusions (De Jong et al., 1994; Pratte et al., 2010; Proctor et al., 2011; Ridderinkhof, 2002a, 2002b) that DPs can be a valuable data-analytic tool, extending routine analyses of mean RT to a finer distributional level and providing more stringent…”
BackgroundMethodResultHolmes, W. R., Trueblood, J. S., & Heathcote, A. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.11.002 · Cited by 80
Schumann, F., Steinborn, M. B., Kürten, J., Cao, L., Händel, B., & Huestegge, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867978 · Cited by 90
Influence of Time Pressure in a Simple Response Task, a Choice-by-Location Task, and the Simon Task
Lubbe, R. H. J. V. D., Jaśkowskí, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027//0269-8803.15.4.241 · Cited by 83
The effective time course of preparation
Los, S. A., & Schut, M. L. J. (2008) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.11.001 · Cited by 81
Wendt, M., Heldmann, M., Münte, T. F., & Kluwe, R. H. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1104 · Cited by 80
“Whereas, traditionally, studies have mainly tried to identify the precise mechanisms that underlie conflict-related performance decrements (thereby developing sophisticated models regarding different types of conflict, e.g., De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994; Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 1990; Kornblum, Hasbroucq, & Osma…”
BackgroundNotebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1197 · Cited by 80
Overlap of attention and movement-related activity in lateralized event-related brain potentials
Oostenveld, R., Praamstra, P., Stegeman, D. F., & van Oosterom, A. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00460-6 · Cited by 77
“The possibility of overlap between the LRP and potentials related to the perception of a laterally presented stimulus has been acknowledged by other investigators (Coles et al., 1995; De Jong et al., 1994; Smulders, 1993).”
ResultAcute caffeine consumption enhances the executive control of visual attention in habitual consumers
Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Lieberman, H. R., Giles, G. E., & Taylor, H. A. (2010) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.07.006 · Cited by 84
Servant, M., White, C. N., Montagnini, A., & Burle, B. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00989 · Cited by 82
“This has never been observed (e.g., Vallesi, Mapelli, Schiff, Amodio, & Umilta, 2005; Valle-Inclan & Redondo, 1998; De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994).”
Praamstra, P., & Oostenveld, R. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00286-0 · Cited by 76
Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying cognitive control
Erb, C. D., Moher, J., Sobel, D. M., & Song, J. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.015 · Cited by 71
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980042000048 · Cited by 78
Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming
Shao, Z., Meyer, A. S., & Roelofs, A. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0332-7 · Cited by 73
Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect
Stoffer, T. H., & Umiltà, C. A. (1997) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(97)80033-7 · Cited by 73
Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task
Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., Fischer, R., & Prinz, W. (2010) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0314-3 · Cited by 70
“…RT distribution analyses including all three tasks by dividing RTs in quartiles (bins) from the fastest to the slowest (see De Jong et al., 1994; but see also Burle, Possamaı¨, Vidal, Bonnet, & Hasbroucq, 2002; de Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, van den Wildenberg, Wijnen, & Burle, 2004).”
MethodPraamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Cools, A. R., Horstink, M. W. I. M., & Stegeman, D. F. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.5.1689 · Cited by 72
“Eimer (1995) has suggested that the first phase of such a biphasic LRP, which he found very clearly in the presence of shared spatial features of stimulus and response, might be related to automatic response activation (see also De Jong et al., 1994).”
Mandich, A., Buckolz, E., & Polatajko, H. (2002) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(02)00020-9 · Cited by 82
A neural network model of inhibitory processes in subliminal priming
Bowman, H., Schlaghecken, F., & Martin Eimer, A. (2006) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280444000823 · Cited by 70
Keye, D., Wilhelm, O., Oberauer, K., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2008) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0188-9 · Cited by 71
Temporal expectation and information processing: A model-based analysis
Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.014 · Cited by 66
Electrophysiological evidence that inhibition supports lexical selection in picture naming
Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., Acheson, D. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.009 · Cited by 67
“Delta plots show the size of an experimental effect (e.g., the RT difference between a congruent and an incongruent condition) as a function of response speed (De Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, 2002; Ridderinkhof et al., 2005; Van Campen et al., 2014).”
Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: Analyses of response time distributions.
Roelofs, A. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.303 · Cited by 68
“Linearity in a distribution plot is by no means a necessity for latency distributions (e.g., De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994; Zhang & Kornblum, 1997), so it is possible that Watt’s regularity does not hold for the present verbal tasks.”
BackgroundWhere are the limits of the effects of exercise intensity on cognitive control?
Davranche, K., Brisswalter, J., & Radel, R. (2014) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2014.08.004 · Cited by 67
Impairment of Executive Functions in Boys with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Fuggetta, G. P. (2006) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297040500203418 · Cited by 66
“Basically, dual-route models (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994; Kornblum, Hasbroucq, & Osman, 1990) maintain that, when the imperative stimulus appears, two routes are activated: the automatic, unconditional (direct) route, independent of stimulus identification; and the conditional (controlled) route,…”
BackgroundNo conflict control in the absence of awareness
Ulrich Ansorge, A., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S., & Kunde, W. (2010) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0313-4 · Cited by 69
Fernandez‐Duque, D., & Thornton, I. M. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.846 · Cited by 66
Steenbergen, L., Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.022 · Cited by 63
“To rule out this possibility, we further examined the data of the long RSI by means of a RT distribution analysis (RT bin analysis; De Jong et al., 1994).”
Boyer, T. W., Longo, M. R., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.003 · Cited by 62
Proctor, R. W., Pick, D. F., Vu, K. L., & Anderson, R. E. (2004) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.014 · Cited by 63
Accessory Stimuli Affect the Emergence of Conflict, Not Conflict Control
Böckler, A., Alpay, G., & Stürmer, B. (2010) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000073 · Cited by 63
“This early incorrect hand activation in the LRP of incompatible trials is typically regarded as automatic response priming mediated by the frontalmotor cortex (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer, 1998; Valle-Inclán, 1996).”
BackgroundMethodProcess interference and code overlap in dual-task performance.
Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.192 · Cited by 61
Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., Martin, R. C., & Meyer, A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0039363 · Cited by 76
“Delta plots are constructed by calculating the RT difference between competing and noncompeting conditions as a function of RT (de Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, 2002; see below for details).”
BackgroundMethodChmielewski, W. X., & Beste, C. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.015 · Cited by 64
“…of cognitive control and automaticity, the Simon, or interference effect in the Simon task is of interest as it has been suggested to result from a combination of automatic and controlled processes (De Jong et al., 1994; Keye et al., 2013; Kornblum et al., 1990; Mückschel et al., 2016).”
Auditory Warning Signals Affect Mechanisms of Response Selection
Fischer, R., Plessow, F., & Kiesel, A. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000012 · Cited by 60
“process irrespective of the required S-R mapping for that task ( De Jong et al., 1994 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChmielewski, W. X., Mückschel, M., & Beste, C. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23974 · Cited by 61
“…automatic” response tendencies indicating the stimulus laterality vs controlled conditional selection of stimulus features indicating the response button) emerges and complicates response selection processes (De Jong et al., 1994; Keye et al., 2013; Kornblum et al., 1990; M€uckschel et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSpatial and numerical processing in children with high and low visuospatial abilities
Crollen, V., & Noël, M. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.006 · Cited by 60
Hedge, C., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Powell, G., Bompas, A., & Sumner, P. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102797 · Cited by 60
Steinborn, M. B., Langner, R., & Huestegge, L. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0810-1 · Cited by 68
Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect
Sellaro, R., Treccani, B., Job, R., & Cubelli, R. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0636-7 · Cited by 60
Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis
Iani, C., Ricci, F., Baroni, G., & Rubichi, S. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.002 · Cited by 61
Individual differences in response conflict adaptations
Keye, D., Wilhelm, O., Oberauer, K., & Stürmer, B. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00947 · Cited by 61
“According to dual-route models this performance impairment is related to conflict between two mutually exclusive response tendencies (Kornblum et al., 1990; De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialSpatial coding in two dimensions
Rubichi, S., Vu, K. L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193832 · Cited by 58
The Simon effect and handedness: Evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding
Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2006) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193709 · Cited by 58
“With regard to the Simon task, two activation components associated with the selection of responses have been consistently found (see, e.g., De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer, 1995; Valle-Inclán, 1996).”
BackgroundMethodOrienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition
Poliakoff, E. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg210 · Cited by 55
“Thus, nonocular response inhibition may produce IOR-like results in cue-target paradigms (Posner et al., 1985; De Jong et al., 1994; Spence and Driver, 1998a; Poliakoff et al., 2002a; Tassinari et al., 2002).”
BackgroundKeys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect
Dittrich, K., Dolk, T., Rothe‐Wulf, A., Klauer, K. C., & Prinz, W. (2013) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z · Cited by 55
Spapé, M., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.001 · Cited by 56
“Several studies have sought to avoid this by using vertical layouts (e.g. De Jong et al., 1994; Stürmer et al., 2002).”
Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects
Houwer, J. D., Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S., & Custers, R. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193522 · Cited by 57
Independent Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts
Li, Q., Nan, W., Wang, K., & Liu, X. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089249 · Cited by 57
“One previous study that also examined a combination of the spatial Stroop and Simon tasks found an interaction of S-S and SR conflict effects [28].”
Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.
Hedge, C., Powell, G., Bompas, A., & Sumner, P. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001028 · Cited by 68
Wascher, E., Reinhard, M., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563346 · Cited by 57
Kubo‐Kawai, N., & Kawai, N. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902990829 · Cited by 55
“This decrease in the Simon effect is often assumed to reflect an automatic activation of spatial codes that decays rapidly (De Jong et al., 1994). In fact, the overall RT for the go/no-go Simon task was slower (534 ms and 561 ms for compatible and incompatible trials, respectively) than that for the standard Simon tas…”
InfluentialOn the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent?
Iani, C., Baroni, G., Pellicano, A., & Nicoletti, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.467251 · Cited by 55
“In order to evaluate the time course of the Simon and affordance effects, we ran a distributional analysis (de Jong et al., 1994; Ratcliff, 1979).”
MethodAttentional origins of the Simon effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
Melara, R. D., Wang, H., Vu, K. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.026 · Cited by 58
Task Rule-Congruency and Simon-Like Effects in Switching between Spatial Tasks
Meiran, N. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980443000421 · Cited by 56
“Hommel (1993, cf. De Jong et al., 1994 ) showed that long-term memory-based compatibility effects were more pronounced among relatively quick responses.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSequential effects in the Simon task: Conflict adaptation or feature integration?
Chen, S., & Melara, R. D. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.003 · Cited by 57
Reaction Times and other Skewed Distributions
Rousselet, G. A., & Wilcox, R. R. (2020) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2019.1630 · Cited by 65
Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
Miller, J. O., & Alderton, M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.149 · Cited by 54
Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information
Proctor, R. W., Lu, C.-H., Wang, H., & Dutta, A. (1995) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00030-x · Cited by 53
Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications
Ivanoff, J., Klein, R. M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03195794 · Cited by 54
To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance
Cross, K. A., & Iacoboni, M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.027 · Cited by 59
“Likemany other forms of SRC inwhich participants respond to static symbolic stimuli (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995), imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus– compatible motor representation.”
Lange, V. M., & Laganaro, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00043 · Cited by 54
Playing the Simon game: Use of the Simon task for investigating human information processing
Proctor, R. W. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.010 · Cited by 60
“Reaction-time distribution analyses suggest that this smaller effect size when responding is delayed in the basic Simon task is due, in turn, to rapid activation of the corresponding response that dissipates over time (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundIani, C., Rubichi, S., Gherri, E., & Nicoletti, R. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.3.358 · Cited by 53
Action blind: Disturbed self-other integration in schizophrenia
Liepelt, R., Schneider, J. C., Aichert, D. S., Wöstmann, N. M., Dehning, S., Möller, H., Riedel, M. J., Dolk, T., & Ettinger, U. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.027 · Cited by 51
The Simon Effect with Conventional Signals
Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Baroni, G., & Nicoletti, R. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.219 · Cited by 53
Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli
Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0061-9 · Cited by 55
“…from irrelevant stimulus dimensions in mixed designs – as in the Simon (1969) task – typically show the opposite pattern to that observed by Adam et al. (1998), and decrease in magnitude with increasing reaction time (e.g., De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994; but see Wiegand & Wascher, 2005).”
A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration
Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980143000433 · Cited by 53
“…larger than that in Experiment 1, although the absolute RT level was about 300 ms higher, which is also a discrepancy from the spatial Simon effect that typically declines with increasing RT level due to the decay of the stimulus’ irrelevant location code (De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1994).”
BackgroundHandy, T. C., Green, V., Klein, R. M., & Mangun, G. R. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.303 · Cited by 53
The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number–space associations
Hoffmann, D., Pigat, D., & Schiltz, C. (2014) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0601-9 · Cited by 50
Iani, C., Stella, G., & Rubichi, S. (2014) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0656-9 · Cited by 50
“…have consistently shown that, in the case of lateralized stimuli, the Simon effect is present for the fastest responses but tends to decrease over time, with null or even inverted effects for the slowest responses (e.g., de Jong et al., 1994; Proctor et al., 2011; Rubichi et al., 1997).”
BackgroundCho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2012) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0458-4 · Cited by 55
“De Jong et al. found that the Simon effect for visual tasks was largest at the short RT bins and decreased as RT increased. Likewise, in Cho and Proctor’s (2010) study, the Simon effect in the standard Simon-task condition (a colored circle located to the left or right) decreased across the RT distribution.”
InfluentialThe Lateralized Readiness Potential
Martin Eimer, A., & COLES, M. G. H. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0189-3_14 · Cited by 52
Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review
Littman, R., Keha, E., & Kalanthroff, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01598 · Cited by 51
“…of response activation processes when facing stimuli which were associated with certain responses, even when these responses were not eventually executed (Osman et al., 1992; De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer, 1995; Valle-Inclán, 1996; Gibbons and Stahl, 2008; also see Rothermund et al., 2005).”
BackgroundBuetti, S., & Kerzel, D. (2008) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.007 · Cited by 51
“It is agreed upon that the Simon effect arises at the stage of response selection (e.g., De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994; Kornblum, Hasbroucq, & Osman, 1990; Rubichi & Pellicano, 2004) and that it involves two independent and parallel response processes (Kornblum et al., 1990).”
BackgroundDoes right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?
Proctor, R. W., Vu, K. L., & Nicoletti, R. (2003) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194855 · Cited by 50
“If the contribution of the automatic route is assumed to be the same across all tasks, an assumption that is commonly made (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994), this pattern of results suggests that the salience manipulations do not just affect the codes responsible for automatic response activation.”
MethodCognitive interference and aging: Insights from a spatial stimulus–response consistency task
Juncos‐Rabadán, O., Pereiro, A. X., & Facal-Mayo, D. (2007) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.003 · Cited by 46
No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes
Hommel, B. (1996) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205480 · Cited by 49
Reaction times and other skewed distributions: problems with the mean and the medianPreprint
Rousselet, G. A., & Wilcox, R. R. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/383935 · Cited by 51
The Influence of Task Instruction on Action Coding: Constraint Setting or Direct Coding?
Wenke, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.803 · Cited by 48
Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation
Puccioni, O., & Vallesi, A. (2011) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0360-5 · Cited by 45
Hommel, B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980143000361 · Cited by 49
“, De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1993; Kornblum, Hasbroucq, & Osman, 1990): on the one hand a highly controlled, task-specific route responsible for translating the relevant stimulus feature into the correct response, on the other a more or less automatic route along which, however, quickly decaying spatial stimulus in…”
Martin Eimer, A., & Schlaghecken, F. (2001) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890109601899 · Cited by 47
The components of visual attention and the ubiquitous Simon effect
Klein, R. M., & Ivanoff, J. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.003 · Cited by 47
Comparing Stroop-like and Simon Effects on Perceptual Features
Scerrati, E., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18185-1 · Cited by 55
Druey, M. D., & Hübner, R. (2007) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0127-1 · Cited by 48
Cross-modal re-mapping influences the Simon effect
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. A. (2002) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195261 · Cited by 47
“They explained this result, in line with dual-route models (De Jong et al., 1994; Kornblum et al., 1990; Zorzi & Umiltà, 1995), by assuming that subjects performing Task I set up STM links to produce correct, spatially incompatible responses.”
ResultTwo orienting mechanisms in posterior parietal lobule: An rTMS study of the Simon and SNARC effects
Rusconi, E., Turatto, M., & Umiltà, C. A. (2007) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290701309425 · Cited by 50
Delta Plots and Coherent Distribution Ordering
Speckman, P. L., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., et al. (2008) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313008x333493 · Cited by 47
Leuthold, H., & Schröter, H. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.055 · Cited by 44
“Contemporary models explain the Simon effect in terms of two parallel S-R processing routes (cf. De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1993; Tagliabue et al., 2000; Zorzi and Umiltà, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSchulte‐Rüther, M., Otte, E., Adigüzel, K., Firk, C., Herpertz‐Dahlmann, B., Koch, I., & Konrad, K. (2016) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1654 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-750
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W4248568169
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- automaticity, dual-process models, spatial attention, stimulus-response compatibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review