The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Like many other forms of SRC in which participants respond to static symbolic stimuli (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995), imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“In sum, the evidence from these two experiments suggests that the processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility (e.g., DeJong et al., 1994;Tagliabue, Zorzi, Umilta, & Bassignani, 2000).”
From Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus–response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities (2012) · cites this paper as DeJong et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous interpretations (e.g., DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994;Wühr & Biebl, 2009), we surmise that responding to the stimulus cue opposite to the one that appears on the screen requires a logical recoding of the relevant stimulus and that this recoding carries-over to the irrelevant stimulus as well.”
From Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus–response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities (2012) · cites this paper as DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 823
Maloney, E. A., Barr, N., Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Numerical Cognition · doi:10.5964/jnc.v5i3.155 · Cited by 5
“According to an absorption account, the NDE should decrease in magnitude as overall RT increases (for the basis of this logic see work on the Simon effect; De Jong et al., 1994; Risko & Besner, 2008; Rubichi et al., 1997).”
BackgroundNo evidence for automatic response activation with target onset in the avatar-compatibility task
Böffel, C., & Müsseler, J. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01052-2 · Cited by 6
Ribas, V. R., Ribas, R. D. M. G., de Oliveira, D. C. L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.12974/2313-1047.2016.03.02.3 · Cited by 6
Investigation of stimulus–response compatibility using a startling acoustic stimulus
Maslovat, D., Carlsen, A. N., & Franks, I. M. (2011) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.010 · Cited by 6
Williams, D. R., Rouder, J. N., & Rast, P. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gwatq · Cited by 5
“, delta plots, De Jong et al., 1994). As we demonstrated, our methodology allows for probing mean–variance lawfulness at the individual level. However, we argue that the “law” should first be clarified for within-person experimental effects. For example, if slower reaction times are predicted to necessarily be more in…”
BackgroundMethodSeegelke, C., Richter, M., Heed, T., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/trf9h · Cited by 6
Scozia, G., Pinto, M., Lozito, S., Binetti, N., Pazzaglia, M., Lasaponara, S., & Doricchi, F. (2024) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-024-02862-1 · Cited by 7
“…of RTs length, a trend that is opposite to that found in many visual Simon tasks (Craft & Simon, 1970; Miller & Schwars, 2021; Simon, 1990), where congruency effects are stronger at fast RTs and progressively decay and even reverse at longer RTs (De Jong et al., 1994; Rubichi et al., 1997).”
Ponce, R., Lupiáñez, J., González‐García, C., Casagrande, M., & Marotta, A. (2024) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12735 · Cited by 9
“Therefore, using a distributional approach (Balota & Abrams, 1995; De Jong et al., 1994), employing tools such as the Conditional Accuracy Function (CAF), could reveal when the congruency effects start to diverge between social and non-social stimuli.”
Elmers, J., Mückschel, M., Akgün, K., Ziemssen, T., & Beste, C. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07974-4 · Cited by 7
Alignment Effects in Spatial Perspective Taking from an External Vantage Point
Hatzipanayioti, A., & Avraamides, M. N. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11020204 · Cited by 5
A neural substrate of early response capture during conflict tasks in sensory areas
Salzer, Y., de Hollander, G., van Maanen, L., & Forstmann, B. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.009 · Cited by 5
Miller, J. O. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01466-5 · Cited by 5
“…distributions of RTs in each single condition (e.g., Van Zandt, 2000), after which it is possible to compare conditions using delta plots (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994), quantile-quantile plots (e.g., Myerson, Adams, Hale, & Jenkins, 2003), estimated divergence points (e.g., Reingold & Sheridan,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the Role of Stimulus-Response Context in Inhibitory Control in Alcohol Use Disorder
Ghin, F., Beste, C., & Stock, A. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11216557 · Cited by 6
“For the Simon task, the dual-route model [24] states that conflicts arise due to competing automatic and controlled (response) selection processes.”
BackgroundMethodStock, A., Wendiggensen, P., Ghin, F., & Beste, C. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28012-5 · Cited by 5
“Post-hoc paired t tests revealed that the intoxication effect (intoxicated minus sober) was significantly larger in incongruent Go trials (63 ± 10 ms) than in congruent Go trials (56 ± 10 ms) (t(34) = 2.”
BackgroundPlanning lane changes using advance visual and haptic information
Frissen, I., & Mars, F. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01879-9 · Cited by 6
“Additional analyses of response times were conducted using an adaptation of the delta plot analysis (de Jong et al., 1994).”
Fast habituation to semantic interference generated by taboo connotation in reading aloud
Sulpizio, S., Scaltritti, M., & Spinelli, G. (2024) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2024.2307367 · Cited by 5
“In a second step, we focused on delta-plot analysis (e.g. De Jong et al., 1994) and considered the variation of the taboo effect as a function of response latency.”
Bräutigam, L. C., Leuthold, H., Mackenzie, I. G., & Mittelstädt, V. (2024) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-024-02896-5 · Cited by 10
“…when selecting a response, resulting in facilitation or impairment of task performance (e.g., Botvinick et al., 2001; Coles et al., 1985; De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995; Hübner et al., 2010; Miller & Schwarz, 2021; Mittelstädt & Miller, 2020; Rid-derinkhof et al., 1995;…”
BackgroundMethodCongruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli
Soetens, E. L. L., Maetens, K., Zeischka, P., & Henderickx, D. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.001 · Cited by 5
Philip, B. A., & Frey, S. H. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3317-z · Cited by 5
Observed and self-experienced conflict induce similar behavioral and neural adaptation
Winkel, J., Wijnen, J. G., Danielmeier, C., Groen, I. I. A., Derrfuß, J., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.628760 · Cited by 5
Task instructions modulate unit–decade binding in two-digit number representation
Faulkenberry, T. J., Cruise, A., & Shaki, S. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1057-9 · Cited by 5
Schlaghecken, F., & Maylor, E. A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000755 · Cited by 5
The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility
Shi, K., & Wang, L. E. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103495 · Cited by 6
Salzer, Y., & Friedman, J. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01177-3 · Cited by 5
Verwey, W. B., Wright, D. L., & Lubbe, R. H. J. V. D. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103044 · Cited by 5
Miller, J. O., & Kaup, B. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103155 · Cited by 4
Semantic context effects in monolingual and bilingual speakers
Patra, A., Bose, A., & Marinis, T. (2020) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100942 · Cited by 4
Do children with overweight respond faster to food-related words?
Tárrega, J., Perea, M., Rojo-Bofill, L. M., Moreno-Giménez, A., Almansa, B., Vento, M., & García‐Blanco, A. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105134 · Cited by 5
“These plots show the magnitude of the difference between two conditions as a function of time speed (see De Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, van den Wildenberg, Wijnen, & Burle, 2004, pp. 369–377).”
BackgroundChapter 5 Lifespan studies of mental chronometry: Insights derived from chronopsychophysiology
Bashore, T. R., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (1998) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(98)80007-1 · Cited by 5
Dissociating object- and response-based components of negative priming through effects of practice
Houghton, G., & Marı́-Beffa, P. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193647 · Cited by 5
“…control is generally attributed to the prefrontal lobes and is widely believed to involve the inhibition of contextually inappropriate responses (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer, 1999; Hazeltine, Poldrack, & Gabrieli, 2000; Heil et al., 2000; Jonides, Smith, Marshuetz, Koeppe, & Reuter-Lorenz, 1998;…”
BackgroundTransfer of an implied incompatible spatial mapping to a Simon task
Luo, C., & Proctor, R. W. (2015) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.011 · Cited by 4
“…an incompatible color mapping has been replicated in many studies, including ones with keypresses made with left and right index fingers (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994; Hasbroucq & Guiard, 1991; Lu & Proctor, 1994; Wühr & Biebl, 2009), although the color labels for the keys may need to be visible…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReaching into response selection: Stimulus and response similarity influence central operations.
Wifall, T., Buss, A. T., Farmer, T. A., Spencer, J. P., & Hazeltine, E. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000301 · Cited by 5
Reward accelerates the preparation of goal-directed actions under conflictPreprint
Adkins, T. J., & Lee, T. G. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hv9mz · Cited by 5
A model of dynamic, within-trial conflict resolution for decision makingPreprint
Weichart, E. R., Turner, B. M., & Sederberg, P. B. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2hk8t · Cited by 5
Trajectory deviations in spatial compatibility tasks with peripheral and central stimuli
Welsh, T. N., Pacione, S. M., Neyedli, H. F., et al. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0597-x · Cited by 4
Decomposing Simon task BOLD activation using a drift-diffusion model framework
McIntosh, J. R., & Sajda, P. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60943-1 · Cited by 4
Patterson, L. A., & Kahan, T. A. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103541 · Cited by 4
Garofalo, G., Gawryszewski, L. G., & Riggio, L. (2022) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-022-01082-5 · Cited by 4
Strykowiec, P., & Szczepanowski, R. (2013) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0146-5 · Cited by 7
The Simon Effect Asymmetry for Left- and Right-Dominant Persons
Proctor, R. W., Zhong, Q., & Chen, J. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.265 · Cited by 4
“A general property of the Simon effect with left and right keypress responses is that it decreases across the RT distribution (De Jong et al., 1994; Proctor et al., 2011).”
BackgroundNovelty and learning in cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task
Cesarei, A. D., D’Ascenzo, S., Nicoletti, R., & Codispoti, M. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01813-z · Cited by 5
Effects of alerting signals on the spatial Stroop effect: evidence for modality differences
Kahan, T. A., & Smith, Z. P. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01846-4 · Cited by 4
“A common explanation for both the Simon effect and the spatial Stroop effect is that these effects result from activation within a dual-route framework (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundGhin, F., Eggert, E., Gholamipourbarogh, N., Talebi, N., & Beste, C. (2024) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26643 · Cited by 4
“Conceptually, the dual-route model (De Jong et al., 1994; Keye et al., 2013) has proposed that response selection in congruent Simon task trials operates via the direct route, requiring little computations during response selection.”
BackgroundA common framework for language comprehension and language production?
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01290104 · Cited by 3
Binding of Event Files in a (go/no-go) Simon Task With an Accessory Peripheral Signal
Maetens, K., Henderickx, D., & Soetens, E. L. L. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.100 · Cited by 4
Biased processing of emotional information in sub-clinical anxiety: Evidence from Simon effects
Schrooten, M. G. S., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.030 · Cited by 4
Houvenaghel, J., Duprez, J., Naudet, F., Argaud, S., Dondaine, T., Drapier, S., Robert, G. H., Drapier, D., Vérin, M., & Sauleau, P. (2016) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.05.045 · Cited by 3
An investigation of spatial representation of pitch in individuals with congenital amusia
Lu, X., Sun, Y., & Thompson, W. F. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1213870 · Cited by 4
Space and Motion Stimulus-Response Correspondence (SRC) Effects in a Single Task
Styrkowiec, P. (2016) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000335 · Cited by 3
Word- and arrow-based Simon effects emerge for eccentrically presented location words and arrows
Luo, C., & Proctor, R. W. (2020) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01280-5 · Cited by 4
Handle-Hand Compatibility Effects for the Right and Left Hand Using Reach-to-Touch Movements
Garofalo, G., Mussi, D. R., & Riggio, L. (2020) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0281-8 · Cited by 4
“There is a general consensus that the SE depends on responseselection processes of two parallel and independent routes, the conditional and unconditional route (De Jong et al., 1994; Lu & Proctor, 1995).”
BackgroundŚmigasiewicz, K., Ambrosi, S., Blaye, A., & Burle, B. (2022) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13273 · Cited by 5
Action monitoring fails when motor execution is too fast: no time for correction
Ramdani, C., Sagui, E., Schmid, B., Castagna, O., Davranche, K., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.15761/jsin.1000246 · Cited by 4
Zhang, D., Liu, L., Huang, B., et al. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01895 · Cited by 4
“The initial dip of LRP in the incompatible condition of the Simon task reflects the activation of incorrect response evoked by spatially compatible S-R associations (Leuthold, 2011; De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundVisual filtering in time and space among persons with Down syndrome
Matsuba, E. S. M., Russo, N. N., McKernan, E. P., et al. (2022) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12958 · Cited by 4
Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task
Mittelstädt, V., Leuthold, H., & Mackenzie, I. G. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01755-y · Cited by 4
“…visual Simon effect with horizontal key press responses is usually larger for faster than for slower responses as becomes evident from distributional analyses (e.g., Burle et al., 2013; De Jong et al., 1994; Luo & Proctor, 2020; Proctor et al., 2011; Wiegand & Wascher, 2005; Wascher et al., 2001).”
BackgroundMethodMarkovitch, B., Markopoulos, P., & Birk, M. V. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642418 · Cited by 7
Hierarchical Knowledge Influences Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects
Tlauka, M., & MCKENNA, F. P. (2000) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755880 · Cited by 4
“This pattern of results is consistent with dual-process models of SRC, which postulate S±R translation as well as automatic activation processes to account for SRC effects (e.g. De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLevels of visuo-spatial selection: An ERP study of negative priming
Gibbons, H., Wiegleb, N., & Stähl, J. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.08.004 · Cited by 4
Ivanov, I. V., & Werner, A. (2009) · Psychology & Neuroscience · doi:10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.04 · Cited by 4
“The observers viewed the display binocularly at 57cm distance in a dark room.”
BackgroundThomaschke, R., Miall, R. C., Rueß, M., Mehta, P. R., & Hopkins, B. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0885-3 · Cited by 4
The accessory Simon effect within and across visual dimensions
Magen, H. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818782769 · Cited by 3
“Similar to this task, the typical Simon effect first increases with RT and is reduced only at the longer RTs (De Jong et al., 1994; Proctor et al., 2011).”
Psychophysiological Studies of Unattended Information Processing
Valle‐Inclán, F., de Labra, C., & Redondo, M. (2000) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1138741600005576 · Cited by 4
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. L. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0411 · Cited by 11
A Diffusion Model Account of Age Differences in Post-Error Slowing
Dutilh, G., Forstmann, B. U., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e502412013-685 · Cited by 4
Janczyk, M., Mackenzie, I. G., Ulrich, R., & Koob, V. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-02878-8 · Cited by 5
“1 The resulting activations for one or the other response are merged and if, as in congruent trials, they indicate the same response, selection is faster compared with when they indicate different responses, as in incongruent trials (e.g., De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994; Kornblum et al., 1990).”
Eggert, P., Mückschel, M., Talebi, N., Beste, C., & Ghin, F. (2025) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaf292 · Cited by 4
Garcia‐Marques, T., & Fernandes, A. (2023) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941231153328 · Cited by 3
“We use the delta plots to approach the inhibition function based on the index of RT, analyzing the IC ability effect distributions by following the same principles that were applied in other inhibition tasks, such as Stroop (de Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, 2002).”
MethodKorolczuk, I., Burle, B., Casini, L. A., Gerc, K., Lustyk, D., Senderecka, M., & Coull, J. T. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319621 · Cited by 6
Inhibition Resolves Simon Conflict: Evidence From Electroencephalogram Decoding
Lee, Y. S., Bae, G., & Cho, Y. S. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.a.59 · Cited by 3
Assessing Posner’s theory of alerting: A meta-analysis of speed-accuracy effects
McCormick, C. R., & Christie, J. J. (2025) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-025-03090-x · Cited by 3
“However, we now know there is an interaction between alerting and response compatibility, in which alerting can activate the direct path between matching stimulus and response features (De Jong et al., 1994).”
Kozlik, J., & Neumann, R. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.015 · Cited by 5
Role of stimulus and response feature overlap in between-task logical recoding
Treccani, B., Ronconi, L., & Umiltà, C. A. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0728-z · Cited by 3
Event-related lateralized readiness potential correlates of the emotion-priming Simon effect
Shang, Q., Fu, H., Qiu, W., & Ma, Q. (2016) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4614-8 · Cited by 3
Holper, L., Aleksandrowicz, A., Müller, M., Ajdacic‐Gross, V., Haker, H., Fallgatter, A. J., Hagenmuller, F., Kawohl, W., & Wulf Rössler, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00172 · Cited by 3
“To obtain a detailed understanding of the behavioral RT data within the emotional Stroop task, we chose a graphical technique called delta plot (De Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof et al., 2005; Speckman et al., 2008; Pratte et al., 2010).”
MethodEmotional interference during conflict resolution depends on task context
Ahmed, S. P., & Sebastian, C. L. (2019) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1701417 · Cited by 3
Learning of irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulates cognitive control
Xia, X., Guo, M., & Wang, L. E. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120206 · Cited by 3
Examining the automaticity and symmetry of sound–shape correspondences
Chen, Y., & Huang, P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172946 · Cited by 3
An Evidence Accumulation Account of Masked Translation Priming in Two Bilingual Populations
Scrimshire, C., Amador, S. A., Aldariz, A. G., Meza, G., & Gomez, P. (2023) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci13071066 · Cited by 3
Yan, L., Ma, Y., Wei-bin, Y., Xiang, X., & Nan, W. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01866-0 · Cited by 4
“In addition to RT distributions (De Jong et al., 1994) and hand-stimulus proximity, the temporal dynamics of cognitive conflict could vary among these effects; the drift diffusion model (DDM, Ratcliff, 1978; Ratcliff et al., 2016) provides a quantitative approach of characterize the temporal…”
Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report
Warman, A., Clark, A., Malcolm, G. L., et al. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241230812 · Cited by 3
“When the task is to judge colour, however, we expected the handle compatibility effect to be present in the earlier quartiles, but to rapidly dissipate in the latter quartiles, consistent with the literature on the temporal profile of the Simon effect (De Jong et al., 1994; Proctor et al., 2011).”
ResultGómez, P., Marcet, A., Rocabado, F., & Perea, M. (2025) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-025-02080-w · Cited by 3
“They have been widely used in cognitive con-trol tasks (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994) and have been used to describe the effects of identity primes versus unrelated primes in adults by Fernández-López et al. (2022).”
Emotion-induced attentional bias: does it modulate the spatial Simon effect?
Lien, M.-C., Proctor, R. W., & Hinkson, J. (2020) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2020.1785847 · Cited by 3
“It has been suggested that the automatic response activation from stimulus location decays over time (e.g. De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1993), leaving the attentional enhancement component to play a role in the spatial Simon effect for longer RT.”
BackgroundThe effect of reducing attentional resources on selective suppression in the Simon task
Grandjean, A., Suárez, I., & Casini, L. A. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218221092421 · Cited by 3
“This mechanism could be the active and progressive inhibition of the response activated automatically by the location of the stimulus, as has been proposed in the activation-suppression model (De Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, 2002a, 2002b).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.611888 · Cited by 3
Möller, M., Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2014) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0760-x · Cited by 3
Spatial coding of word-initial letters: Evidence from a Simon-like task
Treccani, B., Cubelli, R., Sala, S. D., & Umiltà, C. A. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.1.168 · Cited by 3
Independence between implicit and explicit processing as revealed by the Simon effect
Lo, S.-Y., & Yeh, S. (2010) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.007 · Cited by 3
Modulation of responses to emotional information in pathological anxiety
Schrooten, M. G. S., Smulders, F. T. Y., & Arntz, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.012710 · Cited by 3
Action induction due to visual perception of linear motion in depth
Classen, C., & Kibele, A. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0724-3 · Cited by 3
Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K. (2016) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.2.16gru · Cited by 6
A Simon-like effect in Go/No-Go tasks performed in isolation
Davranche, K., Carbonnell, L., Belletier, C., et al. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1534-6 · Cited by 3
Distributional properties of semantic interference in picture naming: Bayesian meta-analyses
Fuhrmeister, P., & Bürki, A. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02016-6 · Cited by 3
“We followed the procedure in, for example, De Jong et al. (1994), Ridderinkhof et al. (2004), Roelofs et al. (2011), and Shao et al. (2013) to calculate the slope as follows: slope(quintile 4, quintile 5) = (delta(quintile 5) − delta(quintile 4))/(mean(quintile 5) − mean(quintile 4)) For each study, we computed the co…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKhalid, S., Peter König, B., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.06.014 · Cited by 3
Saccadic eye movements do not trigger a joint Simon effect
Liepelt, R., Porcu, E., Stenzel, A., & Lappe, M. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01639-0 · Cited by 3
A measure of the interference effect distribution
Gajdos, T., Servant, M., Hasbroucq, T., & Davranche, K. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01339-6 · Cited by 3
“De Jong et al. (1994) introduced a particular method, called delta plot , to describe the link between response speed and the size of an experimental effect.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMoretti, L., Koch, I., Hornjak, R., & von Bastian, C. C. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ndjy6 · Cited by 3
Tanaka, Y., Oyama, T., Ishikawa, K., et al. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251332591 · Cited by 2
“Congruence between these two codes facilitates response formation, whereas incongruence leads to interference, resulting in a standard congruency effect (Castel et al., 2007; De Jong et al., 1994; Ellinghaus et al., 2024; Juncos-Rabadán et al., 2008).”
InfluentialValidating the directional command flanker task: An auditory analog of the arrows flanker
Petley, L., Brzac, J., Meyers, L. A., & Gascoyne, S. J. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02839-4 · Cited by 2
“For accuracy, conditional accuracy functions (CAFs; Luce, 1986) are common, whereas RT slowing with conflict (the RT effect) is typically expressed in delta plots (De Jong et al., 1994).”
Styrkowiec, P., Babijew, A., Dunaj, K., & Wierzbicki, M. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2020.1722135 · Cited by 1
“It was De Jong et al. (1994) who first used RTs distribution analysis to study the Simon effect.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-750
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W4248568169
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- automaticity, dual-process models, spatial attention, stimulus-response compatibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review