The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Like many other forms of SRC in which participants respond to static symbolic stimuli (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995), imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“In sum, the evidence from these two experiments suggests that the processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility (e.g., DeJong et al., 1994;Tagliabue, Zorzi, Umilta, & Bassignani, 2000).”
From Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus–response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities (2012) · cites this paper as DeJong et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous interpretations (e.g., DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994;Wühr & Biebl, 2009), we surmise that responding to the stimulus cue opposite to the one that appears on the screen requires a logical recoding of the relevant stimulus and that this recoding carries-over to the irrelevant stimulus as well.”
From Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus–response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities (2012) · cites this paper as DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 823
Adelhöfer, N., Stock, A., & Beste, C. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02245-4 · Cited by 11
How Task Goals Mediate the Interplay between Perception and Action
Haazebroek, P., van Dantzig, S., & Hommel, B. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00247 · Cited by 12
“Stimulus codes and response codes are connected using two routes (e.g., Kornblum et al., 1990; De Jong et al., 1994; Zorzi and Umiltà, 1995).”
BackgroundDissociable yet tied inhibitory processes: The structure of inhibitory control
Michael, G. A., Mizzi, R., Couffe, C., & Galvéz-García, G. (2014) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0242-y · Cited by 15
Das, K. P., Roy, P., Karmakar, P. S., et al. (2016) · Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems · doi:10.1007/s12591-016-0332-8 · Cited by 11
Cespón, J., Galdo‐Álvarez, S., & Dı́az, F. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39595 · Cited by 11
Fitousi, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02331 · Cited by 11
“Delta plots (DPs) have been first used by De Jong et al. (1994) to probe the size of the Simon effect (e.g., mean RT incongruent – mean RT congruent) as a function of time.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShi, W., Wang, Q., Deng, M., & Xu, D. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102978 · Cited by 12
Strategies that reduce Stroop interference
Pálfi, B., Parris, B. A., Collins, A. F., & Dienes, Z. P. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.202136 · Cited by 16
Dissociation between Awareness and Spatial Coding: Evidence from Unilateral Neglect
Treccani, B., Cubelli, R., Sellaro, R., Umiltà, C. A., & Sala, S. D. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00185 · Cited by 11
“These distributions were divided into five 20% bins (De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994 ) and submitted to an ANCOVA with these variables as between-item factors.”
MethodN2pc is modulated by stimulus–stimulus, but not by stimulus–response incompatibilities
Cespón, J., Galdo‐Álvarez, S., & Dı́az, F. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.010 · Cited by 11
Pellicano, A., eBarna, V., eNicoletti, R., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00362 · Cited by 11
“…only if stimulus and response set overlap (Kornblum et al., 1990; Kornblum, 1992), that is, share levels of similarities, as is the case for left-right stimuli and responses, the spatial code of the stimulus produces automatic activation of the ipsilateral response (see also De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialCorrespondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli
Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Maiorana, N. V., et al. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1079-3 · Cited by 11
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.466 · Cited by 11
Gholamipourbarogh, N., Eggert, E., Münchau, A. M., Frings, C., & Beste, C. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120667 · Cited by 14
“During congruent trials, response selection has been found to run via more automated routes of processing (De Jong et al., 1994; Keye et al., 2013; Kornblum et al., 1990; Mückschel et al., 2016) (but see (Hommel and Wiers, 2017) for critique on this account), making inhibitory control particularly…”
BackgroundTanaka, Y., Oyama, T., Ishikawa, K., & Okubo, M. (2025) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-024-02993-5 · Cited by 12
“De Jong et al.’s (1994) dual-route model postulates that direct (automatic) and indirect (controlled) routes can explain the standard congruency effect (Castel et al., 2007; De Jong et al., 1994; Juncos-Rabadán et al., 2008; Proctor et al., 2011).”
Fedeli, D., Maschio, N. D., Mauro, G. D., Defendenti, F., Sulpizio, S., & Abutalebi, J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17557-6 · Cited by 9
Revisiting Perspective-Taking: Can People Maintain Imagined Perspectives?
Avraamides, M. N., Theodorou, M., Agathokleous, A., & Nicolaou, A. (2013) · Spatial Cognition and Computation · doi:10.1080/13875868.2011.639915 · Cited by 12
Behavioral and neural interaction between spatial inhibition of return and the Simon effect
Wang, P., Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Chen, Q. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00572 · Cited by 10
Duprez, J., Houvenaghel, J., Naudet, F., Dondaine, T., Auffret, M., Robert, G., Drapier, D., Argaud, S., Vérin, M., & Sauleau, P. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00084 · Cited by 11
“…two parallel routes converging towards a given response activation: a direct route that leads to a fast and fairly automatic activation, and an indirect and controlled route that is slower and selects the most appropriate program to engage (Kornblum et al., 1990; De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer, 1995).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGrandjean, A., Suárez, I., Miquée, A., Fonséca, D. D., & Casini, L. A. (2021) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2021.1908979 · Cited by 11
Neural correlates of the reverse Simon effect in the Hedge and Marsh task
Li, H., Xia, T., & Wang, L. E. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.028 · Cited by 10
“R) association (unconditional) (Barber and O'Leary, 1997; De Jong et al., 1994; Kornblum et al., 1990; Zorzi and Umilta, 1995).”
BackgroundTemporal stimulus-response compatibility.
Grosjean, M., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.870 · Cited by 22
Perceptual factors contribute to akinesia in Parkinson’s disease
Ballanger, B., Gil, R., Audiffren, M. F., & Desmurget, M. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0783-1 · Cited by 14
Otte, E., Jost, K., Habel, U., & Koch, I. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.003 · Cited by 10
Hand posture effects on handedness recognition as revealed by the Simon effect
Lameira, A. P. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.059.2009 · Cited by 10
Hilchey, M. D., Satel, J., Ivanoff, J., et al. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0376-5 · Cited by 10
Kato, Y. K., Endô, H., Kizuka, T., & Asami, T. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0090-2 · Cited by 10
“This suggests that the primary motor cortex elicits automatic response preparation regardless of stimulus instruction, i.e., automatic motor activation (Georgopoulos et al. 1989; De Jong et al. 1994; Endo et al. 1999; Kornblum et al. 1999; Riehle et al. 1997).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialModulation of the vertical Simon effect in two-dimensional tasks: The effect of learning
Rubichi, S., Gherri, E., Nicoletti, R., et al. (2005) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440540000040 · Cited by 10
S‐R compatibility effects on motor potentials associated with hand and foot movements
Miller, J. O. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12574 · Cited by 10
Spatial gradients of oculomotor inhibition of return in deaf and normal adults
Jayaraman, S., Klein, R. M., Hilchey, M. D., et al. (2015) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4439-x · Cited by 10
“…inhibition in the deaf at the 850-ms CTOA, we fail to see a convincing mechanistic explanation. some circumstances, be more closely related to the inhibition of manual response codes automatically activated by the cue (e.g., De Jong et al. 1994) than to oculomotor orienting (Hilchey et al. 2013).”
MethodCDF-XL: computing cumulative distribution functions of reaction time data in Excel
Houghton, G., & Grange, J. A. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0119-3 · Cited by 10
“In this case, the effect should be largest at faster RTs (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundBaess, P., Weber, T., & Bermeitinger, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02063 · Cited by 9
Effects of Catecholaminergic and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Response Inhibition
Koyun, A. H., Wendiggensen, P., Roessner, V., Beste, C., & Stock, A. (2024) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyae023 · Cited by 9
“Adding response inhibition trials (i.e., NoGo trials) to a regular Simon paradigm (for task details, please refer to the Methods section) allows to examine the influence of conditional and unconditional automatic processes on cognitive control (De Jong et al., 1994; Chmielewski and Beste, 2017).”
MethodSpeaking Stata: Quantile–quantile plots, generalized
Cox, N. J. (2024) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x241276114 · Cited by 10
“Such plots are known as delta plots in psychology (De Jong, Liang, and Lauber 1994; Speckman et al. 2008).”
ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: a time course analysis
Atalay, N. B., & Mısırlısoy, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01410 · Cited by 9
“Additional to the conventional RT analyses, we investigated the time course of the ISPC effect using delta plots (De Jong et al., 1994).”
MethodBuckolz, E., Lok, M., Kajaste, B., et al. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0541-0 · Cited by 9
Reward Accelerates the Preparation of Goal-directed Actions under Conflict
Adkins, T. J., & Lee, T. G. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02072 · Cited by 13
Working Memory Capacity Predicts Conflict-Task Performance
Gulbinaite, R., & Johnson, A. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.863374 · Cited by 9
“…general increase in the Simon effect followed by a decrease across the RT distribution has been interpreted in terms of automatic activation of the spatially corresponding response triggered by the task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, the strength of which decreases over time (De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundTime counts: Bidirectional interaction between time and numbers in human adults
Arend, I. C., Cappelletti, M., & Henik, A. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.004 · Cited by 9
A transcranial magnetic stimulation study on response activation and selection in spatial conflict
Bardi, L., Schiff, S., Basso, D., et al. (2014) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12803 · Cited by 9
“Taken together, these results are in line with the idea that the PPC–PMC circuit is a neural correlate of visuo-motor transformation through the direct pathway of information processing (De Jong et al., 1994; St€urmer et al., 2007).”
InfluentialHow non-veridical perception drives actions in healthy humans: evidence from synaesthesia
Schreiter, M. L., Chmielewski, W. X., Ward, J., & Beste, C. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0574 · Cited by 10
“stimulus presented at the same side as response hand) conditions where stimulus–action binding is mediated via automated processes [17], response inhibition is worse, compared to spatially non-corresponding (i.”
BackgroundInfluentialScrivano, R. M., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2021) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2021.1874278 · Cited by 10
Neural correlates of the Simon effect modulated by practice with spatial mapping
Wang, L. E., & Weekes, B. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.019 · Cited by 10
Clough, M., Dobbing, J., Stankovich, J. M., et al. (2019) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2019.101522 · Cited by 9
Zhong, Q., Proctor, R. W., Xiong, A., & Vu, K. L. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-01998-0 · Cited by 8
Suppression of involuntary spatial response activation requires selective attention
Ward, R. D., Danziger, S., Quirk, R. T., Goodson, L., & Downing, P. E. (2005) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280444000238 · Cited by 9
Dual–Task Slowing and the Effects of Cross–Task Compatibility
Azuma, R., Prinz, W., & Koch, I. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980343000459 · Cited by 9
“R compatibility (De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1993, 1994a, 1994b; Kornblum, 1992, 1994; Kornblum et al., 1990; Kornblum & Lee, 1995; Zhang et al., 1999).”
Angrilli, A., Zorzi, M., Tagliabue, M., et al. (2001) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200104170-00022 · Cited by 9
Steinborn, M. B., & Huestegge, L. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01143-z · Cited by 9
No Negative Priming Effect in the Manual Stroop Task
Mills, L., Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01764 · Cited by 8
“The readers are referred to De Jong et al. (1994), Pratte et al. (2010) and Burle et al. (2014) for detail.”
BackgroundSulpizio, S., Spinelli, G., & Scaltritti, M. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01552-5 · Cited by 8
“…the difference between response latencies for trials featuring color associated vs. color-unrelated carrier words) is assessed across the different quantiles of the RT distribution (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994), thus capturing how the semantic Stroop effect varies as a function of response latency.”
MethodObjects, spatial compatibility, and affordances: A connectionist study
Borghi, A. M., Ferdinando, A. D., & Parisi, D. (2010) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.06.001 · Cited by 8
Martín‐Arévalo, E., Lupiáñez, J., Botta, F., & Chica, A. B. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00132 · Cited by 8
“…one that is transiently generated from the spatial location of the target (which is task-irrelevant) and another one that, due to task-demands, would be activated by the non-spatial identity of the target (see e.g., Hommel, 1993; de Jong et al., 1994; Kornblum et al., 1999; Ivanoff et al., 2002).”
BackgroundMurchison, N. M., & Proctor, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2013.823906 · Cited by 8
The effects of alerting signals in masked priming
Fischer, R., Plessow, F., & Kiesel, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00448 · Cited by 7
“We conducted RT distribution analyses (De Jong et al., 1994; Kinoshita and Hunt, 2008; Fischer et al., 2010) to test whether www.frontiersin.org July 2013 | Volume 4 | Article 448 | 3 FIGURE 1 | Response times (RTs), standard errors of the means, and percent error (PE) in Experiment 1 as a function…”
MethodNasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors
Huber‐Huber, C., Grubert, A., Ansorge, U., et al. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00344.2014 · Cited by 8
Proactive and reactive control in S ‐ R compatibility: A brain potential analysis
Mansfield, K. L., van der Molen, M. W., & Boxtel, G. J. M. V. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01368.x · Cited by 8
“The dual-process model of de Jong et al. (1994) is based on logical recoding.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCompatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location
Schankin, A., Valle‐Inclán, F., & Hackley, S. A. (2009) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0247-x · Cited by 8
Michel, R., Bölte, J., & Liepelt, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674 · Cited by 8
“…trials (required response and stimulus on the same side) compared to incompatible trials (spatial location of response and stimulus differ) which will elicit a response conflict requiring additional time to be solved (De Jong et al., 1994; Nicoletti and Umiltà, 1994; Hommel et al., 2001).”
BackgroundThe location-based Simon effect: Reliability of ex-Gaussian analysis
Luo, C., & Proctor, R. W. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00960-2 · Cited by 8
Modifying response times in the Simon task with transcranial random noise stimulation
McIntosh, J. R., & Mehring, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15604-1 · Cited by 10
A Role for Set in the Control of Automatic Spatial Response Activation
Risko, E. F., & Besner, D. (2007) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.38 · Cited by 8
Caessens, B., Notebaert, W., Burle, B., & Soetens, E. L. L. (2005) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440540000130 · Cited by 8
“Burle, van den Wildenberg, and Ridderinkhof start from the observations that congruency benefits in masked priming turn into congruency costs with increasing time and that the size of the Simon effect decreases with increasing reaction times (De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundBaess, P., Ecker, U. K. H., Janssen, S. M. J., Jin, Z., & Bermeitinger, C. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01360-9 · Cited by 6
López, F. M., & Pomi, A. (2023) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-023-09990-8 · Cited by 9
“To quantify this phenomenon, De Jong et al. (1994) introduced a methodology for studying the dependence of effect sizes with response times, called delta plots.”
InfluentialChmielewski, W. X., & Beste, C. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.006 · Cited by 7
RetractedResponding, fast and slow: Visual detection and localization performance is unaffected by retrieval
Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2023) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-023-02810-5 · Cited by 7
Ellinghaus, R., Liepelt, R., Mackenzie, I. G., & Mittelstädt, V. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-024-00211-x · Cited by 7
“For the classic Simon task, mainly decreasing delta plots have been reported (De Jong et al., 1994; Pratte et al., 2010; Servant et al., 2014; Vallesi et al., 2005; Wiegand & Wascher, 2005).”
Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments
Vu, K. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2011) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0205-8 · Cited by 7
Ivanoff, J., Blagdon, R. A., Feener, S., McNeil, M., & Muir, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00243 · Cited by 7
“…of the connectivity between spatial features of the stimulus and the response they state, “[t]hese associations have been described as unconditional (de Jong et al., 1994), permanent (Barber and O’Leary, 1997), and as being either hard-wired or learned from a lifetime’s experience (Umiltà and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTypes of interference and their resolution in monolingual word production
Korko, M., Coulson, M., Jones, A., & Davies, P. (2021) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103251 · Cited by 6
Procedural Control Versus Resources as Potential Origins of Human Hyper Selectivity
Ulrich Ansorge, A., Büsel, C., Forstinger, M., Gugerell, D., Grüner, M., Pomper, U., Stolte, M., Schmid, R. R., & Valuch, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718141 · Cited by 6
“…route, responsible for the selection of task-dependent responses to the colors, and an automatic processing route, responsible for the automatic activation of response sides or positions by stimulus positions (Kornblum et al., 1990; De Jong et al., 1994; Zorzi and Umiltá, 1995; Zhang et al., 1999).”
BackgroundAuditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance
Golob, E. J., Nelson, J. T., Scheuerman, J., Venable, K. B., & Mock, J. R. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13903 · Cited by 9
Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211043860 · Cited by 6
“Like other task-irrelevant stimulus features, polarity of the stimulus should automatically activate the code for the response with the corresponding polarity and inhibit the code for the response with the noncorresponding polarity (cf. De Jong et al., 1994; Hommel, 1997; Zorzi & Umiltà, 1995).”
BackgroundMann, L. G., Servant, M., Hay, K. R., Song, A. K., Trujillo, P., Yan, B., Kang, H., Zald, D. H., Donahue, M. J., Logan, G. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02048 · Cited by 7
“Inhibition during longer RTs is assessed by determining delta functions, which reflect the difference in RT quantiles between congruent and incongruent trials versus the average of RT quantiles between congruent and incongruent trials (Ulrich et al., 2015; De Jong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994).”
Stimulus–response compatibility and affective computing: a review
Lemmens, P. M. C., de Haan, A., van Galen, G. P., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2006) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220600588168 · Cited by 7
Simon in action: the effect of spatial congruency on grasping trajectories
Freud, E., Aisenberg-Shafran, D., Salzer, Y., et al. (2013) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0533-5 · Cited by 7
Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location
Valle‐Inclán, F., Sohn, F., & Redondo, M. (2007) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00616.x · Cited by 7
Compatibility effects on performance and executive control in dynamic task settings
de Jong, R. (1997) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(97)80036-2 · Cited by 6
Self-citationStrategies that reduce Stroop interferencePreprint
Pálfi, B., Parris, B. A., Collins, A., & Dienes, Z. P. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ej7w8 · Cited by 6
A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC)
Janczyk, M., Mackenzie, I. G., & Koob, V. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02574-5 · Cited by 7
Smith, P., & Ulrich, R. (2025) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-02075-z · Cited by 8
“Thus, tools like delta plots allow for interesting insights on the differences in accrual over time between congruent and incongruent conditions, such as the noted negative slope commonly seen in the Simon task (de Jong et al., 1994; Pratte et al., 2010; Schwarz & Miller, 2012).”
Ponce, R., Lupiáñez, J., González‐García, C., Casagrande, M., & Marotta, A. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70004 · Cited by 8
“…is processed by controlled mechanisms, while task-irrelevant information is handled by automatic, transient processes (Banich, 2019; Cohen et al., 1990; De Jong et al., 1994; Ridderinkhof, 2002a, 2002b; Ulrich et al., 2015; see also direct and indirect route, for example, Luo & Proctor, 2019).”
InfluentialMechanisms Underlying Transfer of Task-Defined Rules Across Feature Dimensions
Baroni, G., Yamaguchi, M., Chen, J., & Proctor, R. W. (2013) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000214 · Cited by 5
Schöpper, L.-M., Jerusalem, A., Lötzke, L., & Frings, C. (2023) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-023-02791-5 · Cited by 7
Ficarella, S. C., Desantis, A., Zénon, A., & Burle, B. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11060680 · Cited by 6
“Previous studies reported that, in the Simon task, the compatibility effect decreases as RTs increase, as evidenced by negative-going delta plots [33,45,49].”
ResultAnalyzing facial expression decision times: Reaction time distribution matters.
Tipples, J. (2022) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0001098 · Cited by 8
Seegelke, C., Richter, M., Heed, T., & Wühr, P. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0001162 · Cited by 10
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. L. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210801954942 · Cited by 6
“The SRC effect for physical locations (and that for words) was obtained by subtracting 378 THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (2) the mean for the compatible mapping of physical locations in each bin from the mean for the incompatible mapping (e.g., De Jong et al., 1994).”
BackgroundMethodThe Size of the Simon Effect Depends on the Nature of the Relevant Task
Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., & Fias, W. (2007) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.3.202 · Cited by 6
Mordkoff, J. T., & Hazeltine, E. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.010 · Cited by 6
Affective Spatial Compatibility Task (AffSCt): Theory and applications
Conde, E. F. Q., Matsushima, E. H., Alves, N. T., et al. (2014) · Temas em Psicologia · doi:10.9788/tp2014.3-08 · Cited by 6
Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks
Dittrich, K., & Stahl, C. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1253-x · Cited by 6
Lunching for Relaxation or Cognitive Control? After-Effects of Social and Solitary Meals
Stürmer, B., Ouyang, G., Palazova, M., et al. (2018) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0234-3 · Cited by 6
Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson’s disease
Fabbri, M., Vitale, C., Cuoco, S., et al. (2018) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-0642-0 · Cited by 6
Kaliuzhna, M., Serino, A., Berger, S., & Blanke, O. (2018) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-018-5403-3 · Cited by 6
Friedrich, J., & Beste, C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61025-y · Cited by 7
An auditory hand-proximity effect: The auditory Simon effect is enhanced near the hands
Wang, X., Du, S., Zhang, K., & Du, F. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01860-2 · Cited by 7
“Human visual perception and attentional selection near the hands are substantially altered compared with these processes far from the hands (Abrams, Davoli, Du, Knapp III, & Paull, 2008; Brockmole, Davoli, Abrams, & Witt, 2013; Di Pellegrino & Frassinetti, 2000; Reed, Grubb, & Steele, 2006).”
BackgroundCognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter
Maxfield, N. D. (2021) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105841 · Cited by 6
The flexibility of spatial-numerical associations and its internal mechanism
Yan, L., Chen, Y., Xun, L. I. U., et al. (2021) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.00051 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-750
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W4248568169
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- automaticity, dual-process models, spatial attention, stimulus-response compatibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
