Cited by 323Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

I am not an animal: Mortality salience, disgust, and the denial of human creatureliness.

Goldenberg, Jamie L., Pyszczynski, Tom, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon, Kluck, Benjamin, Cornwell, Robin·2001·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The present research investigated the need to distinguish humans from animals and tested the hypothesis derived from terror management theory that this need stems in part from existential mortality concerns. Specifically, the authors suggest that being an animal is threatening because it reminds people of their vulnerability to death; therefore, reminding people of their mortality was hypothesized to increase the need to distance from animals. In support, Study 1 revealed that reminders of death led to an increased emotional reaction of disgust to body products and animals. Study 2 showed that compared to a control condition, mortality salience led to greater preference for an essay describing people as distinct from animals; and within the mortality salient condition but not the control condition, the essay emphasizing differences from other animals was preferred to the essay emphasizing similarities. The implications of these results for understanding why humans are so invested in beautifying their bodies and denying creaturely aspects of themselves are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.427

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Kluck, B., & Cornwell, R.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2001
Volume
130
Issue
3
Pages
427-435
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2050725966
Cited by
323
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
mortality salience, terror management theory, disgust, human-animal distinction, human uniqueness, fear of death, animal products, body image, existential concerns
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Attitude to Death, Defense Mechanisms, Denial, Psychological, Existentialism, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Values, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review