The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?
Abstract
Experiments 1-2 examined generic knowledge and episodic memories of putting in novice and expert golfers. Impoverished episodic recollection of specific putts among experts indicated that skilled putting is encoded in a procedural form that supports performance without the need for step-by-step attentional control. According to explicit monitoring theories of choking, such proceduralization makes putting vulnerable to decrements under pressure. Experiments 3-4 examined choking and the ability of training conditions to ameliorate it in putting and a nonproceduralized alphabet arithmetic skill analogous to mental arithmetic. Choking occurred in putting but not alphabet arithmetic. In putting, choking was unchanged by dual-task training but eliminated by self-consciousness training. These findings support explicit monitoring theories of choking and the popular but infrequently tested belief that attending to proceduralized skills hurts performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which could in turn lead to choking under pressure (Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Beilock & Carr, 2001
Citations
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · cited 1×
“Why does the execution of a well-learned skill fail under pressure? Research investigating skill and expertise has produced a number of important findings regarding the variables that mediate optimal skill performance (Allard & Starkes, 1991; Anderson, 1982, 1987; Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Romer, 1993; Keele, 1986; Lo…”
BackgroundEgeth, H. E., & Kahneman, D. J. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,976
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · Cited by 5,248
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · cited 3×
“To others, however, a problem will come immediately to mind: There is well-known evidence suggesting that expertise serves to enhance episodic recollection, not degrade it. For example, in their classic chess study, Chase and Simon (1973) found that chess masters were better able to recall briefly presented chess posi…”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Handbook of perception and human performance
Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L., & Thomas, J. P. (1986) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 4,033
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Short-term retention of individual verbal items.
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0049234 · Cited by 2,939
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Anderson, 1993, Rules of mind.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-7393.10.2.181 · DOI
- Fitts, 1967, Human performance.
- Hirst, 1978, Divided attention., Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 1, 54
- Jones, 1998, Classic instruction in golf.
- Keele, 1986, Motor control., Vol. 2, 1
- 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1091 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.118 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Anxiety and performance: perceptual-motor behavior in high-pressure contexts
Nieuwenhuys, A., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.019 · Cited by 145
Trait and State Differences in Working Memory Capacity
Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W. (2010) · Plenum series on human exceptionality · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_18 · Cited by 137
van der Kamp, J. (2006) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410500190841 · Cited by 127
“Modern theories of skill acquisition and expert performance concur that it is not so much the attention being diverted, but conscious attempts to exert control over the action that lead to failure under pressure (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Masters, 1992, 2000; Willingham, 1998).”
BackgroundThe impact of physical exercise on convergent and divergent thinking
Colzato, L. S., Szapora, A., Pannekoek, J. N., & Hommel, B. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00824 · Cited by 143
“For one, athletes may have developed more automatic action-control routines, which frees capacity-limited processes from engaging and action monitoring and control (Beilock and Carr, 2001; Schneider and Chein, 2003).”
BackgroundThe role of attention in motor control.
Lohse, K. R., Jones, M., Healy, A. F., & Sherwood, D. E. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0032817 · Cited by 128
“…of impaired performance resulting from an internal FOA is the constrained action hypothesis (Wulf, 2007, 2012), which posits that an internal FOA increases explicit monitoring of otherwise implicit motor behaviors, slowing processing and hurting performance (see also Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
Choking under pressure: The role of fear of negative evaluation
Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2011) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.007 · Cited by 126
Hierarchical Control of Cognitive Processes
Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2011) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385527-5.00001-2 · Cited by 139
“…skills that exhibit paradoxical dissociations between explicit knowledge and implicit knowledge: practitioners of high-level skills know how to perform very well but do not know much about how they do it (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Beilock, Carr, MacMahon, & Starkes, 2002; Terzuolo & Viviani, 1980).”
InfluentialWilson, M. (2008) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/17509840802400787 · Cited by 136
“Furthermore, other studies testing distraction versus self-focus accounts of choking in motor skill tasks have been more supportive of self-focus accounts (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Gucciardi & Dimmock, 2008; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundInfluentialFiloteo, J. V., Lauritzen, S., & Maddox, W. T. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610362646 · Cited by 125
“Beilock and Carr (2001) demonstrated that performance on primary tasks with greater working memory requirements is more vulnerable to secondary-task interference.”
The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance
Kubose, T. T., Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F., & Mayhugh, J. (2005) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1164 · Cited by 129
Proficient brain for optimal performance: the MAP model perspective
Bertollo, M., di Fronso, S., Filho, E., Conforto, S., Schmid, M., Bortoli, L., Comani, S., & Robazza, C. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2082 · Cited by 124
“Taking a different perspective, self109 focus theories (explicit monitoring, Beilock & Carr, 2001, and reinvestment, Master & Maxell, 110 2008) centre on the excessive reinvestment of attention on movement execution.”
BackgroundSelf-talk and Competitive Sport Performance
Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Galanis, E., Comoutos, N., & Theodorakis, Y. (2013) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2013.790095 · Cited by 123
“Expert performance can be harmed when movements are consciously controlled because this is proceduralized or automated with extended practice, especially in high pressure situations (Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundPre-performance routines in sport: current understanding and future directions
Cotterill, S. T. (2010) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2010.488269 · Cited by 122
“Of the above mentioned studies most are based upon suggestions made in prior related publications (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Boutcher & Crews, 1987; Czech et al., 2004; Foster et al., 2006; Gould & Udry, 1994; Harle & Vickers, 2001; Holder, 2003; Shaw, 2002; Singer, 2002; Wrisberg & Penn, 1992) which…”
BackgroundThe role of working memory in sport
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2010) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2010.526238 · Cited by 142
“Pressure has a different effect on these kinds of proceduralized skills as suggested by prominent self-focus theories (Baumeister, 1984), such as the explicit monitoring hypothesis (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001), or the conscious processing hypothesis (Hardy et al., 1996; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundA Comparison of Different Pre-Performance Routines as Possible Choking Interventions
Mesagno, C., & Mullane-Grant, T. (2010) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2010.491780 · Cited by 120
“Using this combined pressure, researchers have increased anxiety levels significantly (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Lewis & Linder, 1997; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundInvestigating the effects of ego depletion on physical exercise routines of athletes
Dorris, D. C., Power, D., & Kenefick, E. (2011) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.10.004 · Cited by 119
Emotional Intelligence Scores Predict Team Sports Performance in a National Cricket Competition
Crombie, D., Lombard, C. J., & Noakes, T. D. (2009) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1260/174795409788549544 · Cited by 119
“Failure to secure such control is seen to be implicated in the phenomenon of “choking under pressure”, which results in sub-optimal task performance [5-8] The Distraction version, on the other hand, claims that under pressure the sports performance of athletes suffers as a result of shifting their attention outside, o…”
BackgroundMacIntyre, T. E., Igou, E. R., Campbell, M. J., Moran, A. P., & Matthews, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01155 · Cited by 118
“Research on “choking” in sport has illuminated our understanding of anxiety across both cognitive skills (e.g., Lyons and Beilock, 2012) and motor skill contexts (e.g., Beilock and Carr, 2001; Beilock and Gonso, 2008; DeCaro et al., 2011; Toner and Moran, 2011; Toner et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialAtieh, M. A., Payne, A. G. T., Duncan, W. J., Silva, K. D., & Cullinan, M. P. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 117
Psychological, muscular and kinematic factors mediate performance under pressure
Cooke, A., Kavussanu, M., McIntyre, D. B., & Ring, C. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01021.x · Cited by 117
Action production influences 12‐month‐old infants’ attention to others’ actions
Cannon, E. N., Woodward, A. L., Gredebäck, G., von Hofsten, C., & Turek, C. (2011) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01095.x · Cited by 118
“…in these perceptual processes: neural and cognitive systems contribute to action production and are active during the observation of others’ actions (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Chartrand & Bargh, 1999; Decety, Chaminade, Gr!zes & Meltzoff, 2002; Di Pellegrino, Fadiga, Fogassi, Gallese & Rizzolatti,…”
Gentile, A., Boca, S., & Giammusso, I. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.013 · Cited by 142
Holt, L. E., & Beilock, S. L. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193983 · Cited by 119
“One characteristic of expert performance is flexibility—the ability to act on and anticipate novel occurrences in one’s skill domain ( Beilock & Carr, 2001 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChoking under pressure: theoretical models and interventions
Mesagno, C., & Beckmann, J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.015 · Cited by 114
Beilock, S. L., & Gray, R. (2012) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2012.02.014 · Cited by 120
“The finding that high-level skills are disrupted by attention directed toward processes that normally run outside conscious awareness (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Beilock et al., 2002; Lewis & Linder, 1997; Masters, 1992; Masters, Polman, & Hammond, 1993) has also been reported for baseball batting…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationImplicit perceptual training: how, when, and why?
Jackson, R. C., & Farrow, D. (2005) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.003 · Cited by 114
Gimmig, D., Huguet, P., Caverni, J.-P., & Cury, F. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213916 · Cited by 121
Caviola, S., Carey, E., Mammarella, I. C., & Szűcs, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01488 · Cited by 148
“Stressful situations can also be induced by manipulating the context in which the problem is presented, such as punishing poor performance with social consequences, in order to interfere with cognition (Beilock and Carr, 2001, 2005).”
Steenbergen, B., van der Kamp, J., Verneau, M., Jongbloed‐Pereboom, M., & Masters, R. S. W. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.497035 · Cited by 114
“Similar to high-skilled players without neurological disorders [75,76], the dribbling performance of high-skilled soccer players with CP was not adversely affected by the secondary task, suggesting that dribbling was automatised.”
The ???Yips??? in Golf: A Continuum Between a Focal Dystonia and Choking
Smith, A. M., Adler, C. H., Crews, D., Wharen, R. E., Laskowski, E. R., Barnes, K., Valone Bell, C., Pelz, D., Brennan, R. D., Smith, J., et al. (2003) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200333010-00002 · Cited by 112
Ford, P. R., Hodges, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2005) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.37.5.386-394 · Cited by 112
“…attention on those proceduralized components, which normally run under reduced levels of conscious control (i.e., more automatically), skill processes are brought back into working memory, where the skill becomes decomposed into smaller units (see also Beilock & Carr, 2001; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundFurther Tests of the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures in Task Switching
Vandierendonck, A. (2018) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.6 · Cited by 111
“When the instructions drive responding towards extreme speed, at some point performance will simply break down (known as choking under pressure, Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-consciousness and trait anxiety as predictors of choking in sport
Wang, J., Marchant, D., Morris, T., & Gibbs, P. (2004) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/s1440-2440(04)80007-0 · Cited by 108
Developing Effective Pre-performance Routines in Golf: Why Don't We Ask the Golfer?
Cotterill, S. T., Sanders, R., & Collins, D. (2010) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200903403216 · Cited by 107
“…& Tam, 2007; Moran, 1996), enhancing ability to focus and the recall of physiological and psychological states (Foster, Weigand, & Baines, 2006; Marlow, Bull, Heath & Shambrook, 1998), and reducing the unraveling of automaticity (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Beilock, Carr, MacMahon, & Starks, 2002).”
BackgroundAbernethy, B., Schorer, J., Jackson, R. C., & Hagemann, N. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0028452 · Cited by 106
Does the Attentional Focus Adopted by Swimmers Affect Their Performance?
Stoate, I., & Wulf, G. (2011) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1260/1747-9541.6.1.99 · Cited by 106
“, “conscious processing hypothesis” [28]; “constrained action hypothesis” [14]; “explicit monitoring” [29]).”
Motivational Representations within a Computational Cognitive Architecture
Sun, R. (2009) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-009-9005-z · Cited by 104
“Beilock and Carr [6] showed that golf putting performance was worse when participants were under pressure (due to video taping and other setups that induced pressure).”
BackgroundMoreira, P. E. D., Dieguez, G. T. D. O., Bredt, S. D. G. T., & Praça, G. M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18041732 · Cited by 105
“Explicit monitoring of movement execution demands the working memory to process movement information (type 2 processing, a slow process) differently from the fast movement responses required from the athletes in competitive sport contexts [50].”
BackgroundA Pre-Performance Routine to Alleviate Choking in “Choking-Susceptible” Athletes
Mesagno, C., Marchant, D., & Morris, T. (2008) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.22.4.439 · Cited by 105
“Advocates of the self-focus model (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Jackson, Ashford, &”
BackgroundNeurocognitive mechanisms of the flow state
Harris, D., Vine, S. J., & Wilson, M. (2017) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.06.012 · Cited by 118
A qualitative examination of choking under pressure in team sport
Hill, D. M., & Shaw, G. (2012) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.008 · Cited by 103
Expert Performance in Sport: A Cognitive Perspective
Hodges, N. J., Starkes, J. L., & MacMahon, C. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816796.027 · Cited by 102
A re‐examination of choking in sport
Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Fleming, S., & Matthews, N. (2009) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461390902818278 · Cited by 109
“The second set are the self-focus theories (Baumeister, 1984 ), which include the conscious processing hypothesis (Masters, 1992 ), and are collectively termed “explicit monitoring” (Beilock & Carr, 2001 ).”
BackgroundDiMenichi, B. C., & Tricomi, E. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01282 · Cited by 116
“…suggests that increased attention drawn to one’s own performance can result in performance decrements or “choking under pressure” (Baumeister, 1984; Beilock and Carr, 2001, 2005; Ramirez et al., 2013), so the presence of a female competitor may increase pressure in a learning environment if…”
BackgroundWard, P., Farrow, D., Harris, K. R., Williams, A. M., Eccles, D. W., & Ericsson, K. A. (2008) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995600701804814 · Cited by 102
“Although the explanations of failure under pressure when learning using explicit as opposed to more implicit methods is still open to debate (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Masters, 1992; Smeeton et al., 2005; Ward, Szalma, & Hancock, 2003), a number of sport psychology researchers have reported that…”
BackgroundStereotype Threat and Sport: Can Athletic Performance Be Threatened?
Beilock, S. L., & McConnell, A. R. (2004) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.26.4.597 · Cited by 100
“…suggested that well-learned motor skills fail under pressure because such environments prompt individuals to increase the amount of attention they devote to controlling step-by-step performance in order to ensure a positive outcome (Baumeister, 1984; Beilock & Carr, 2001; Lewis & Linder, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationA Qualitative Exploration of Choking in Elite Golf
Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.4.3.221 · Cited by 96
Stress and Cognition: A Cognitive Psychological Perspective
Bourne, L. E., & Yaroush, R. A. (2003) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 97
Self-confidence and performance: A little self-doubt helps
Woodman, T., Akehurst, S., Hardy, L., & Beattie, S. (2010) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.05.009 · Cited by 94
External focus and autonomy support: Two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits
Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2015) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015 · Cited by 92
Coping Under Pressure: Employing Emotion Regulation Strategies to Enhance Performance Under Pressure
Balk, Y. A., Adriaanse, M. A., de Ridder, D. T. D., & Evers, C. (2013) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.35.4.408 · Cited by 92
“This is especially true for highly practiced performances, such as free throws, which over many years of practice have become highly automatic (i.e., they require little conscious attention; Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundYu, R. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00019 · Cited by 104
“Choking was diminished by self-consciousness training, which deals with situations that raise self-awareness and self-focusing (Beilock and Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundTrends and knowledge base in sport and exercise psychology research: a bibliometric review study
Lindahl, J., Stenling, A., Lindwall, M., & Colliander, C. (2015) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2015.1019540 · Cited by 94
“Beilock S represents research on the slightly wider concept of choking under pressure (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Beilock & Gray, 2007) that can be seen as meta-concept under which various explanations (e.g., attentional, drive, and behavioral theories) for why people choke under pressure are…”
BackgroundWhen does haste make waste? Speed-accuracy tradeoff, skill level, and the tools of the trade.
Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., Hoerger, M. P., & Carr, T. H. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0012859 · Cited by 92
Self-citationThe two modes of an athlete: dual-process theories in the field of sport
Furley, P., Schweizer, G., & Bertrams, A. (2015) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2015.1022203 · Cited by 95
“…his attention on the successful execution of his silver medal-winning horizontal bar routine; on the contrary, this might even disturb smooth execution as predicted by the ‘paralysis by analysis’ hypothesis (e.g. Baumeister, 1984; Beilock & Carr, 2001; Hardy, Mullen, & Jones, 1996; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundDOES THE BETTER-THAN-AVERAGE EFFECT SHOW THAT PEOPLE ARE OVERCONFIDENT?: TWO EXPERIMENTS
Benoît, J.-P., Dubra, J., & Moore, D. A. (2014) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12116 · Cited by 90
Maurer, H., & Munzert, J. (2013) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.02.001 · Cited by 88
An Integrative Framework of Stress, Attention, and Visuomotor Performance
Vine, S. J., Moore, L. J., & Wilson, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01671 · Cited by 109
“…directed attentional systems might account for the monitoring of movement effects described in self-focus accounts of choking (e.g., Masters, 1992; Beilock and Carr, 2001), as attention may become inefficiently pulled toward salient but disruptive movement cues when anxious (see also Eysenck and…”
InfluentialThe fourth dimension: A motoric perspective on the anxiety–performance relationship
Carson, H. J., & Collins, D. J. (2015) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2015.1072231 · Cited by 102
“However, Beilock and Carr (2001) later proposed that conscious monitoring of the skill is responsible for skill failure.”
BackgroundRegulatory fit as a determinant of sport performance: How to succeed in a soccer penalty-shooting
Plessner, H., Unkelbach, C., Memmert, D., Baltes, A., & Kolb, A. (2008) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.02.001 · Cited by 86
Performance degradation under pressure in music: an examination of attentional processes
Wan, C. Y., & Huon, G. F. (2005) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735605050649 · Cited by 91
“The video-monitoring training was deliberately designed to raise the participants’ self-consciousness during practice (Beilock and Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAttentional Focusing Instructions and Force Production
Marchant, D. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00210 · Cited by 85
“…of skill execution) when under pressure and that this is a critical mechanisms in choking under pressure (Baumeister, 1984; Lewis and Linder, 1997; Beilock and Carr, 2001), researchers assessing exertional experiences and tolerances note that attention is drawn internally (primarily onto…”
BackgroundMacpherson, A. C., Collins, D. J., & Obhi, S. S. (2009) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200802595930 · Cited by 83
“Indeed, typical studies have considered the effects of debilitating cognitions ( Beilock & Carr, 2001 ; Masters, 1992 ) and their associated effects on performance in sport.”
BackgroundBeckmann, J., Gröpel, P., & Ehrlenspiel, F. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0029852 · Cited by 84
Suchy-Dicey, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164238 · Cited by 90
Cooke, A., Kavussanu, M., McIntyre, D. B., Boardley, I. D., & Ring, C. (2011) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01175.x · Cited by 83
Sport psychology: contemporary themes
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-5354 · Cited by 82
Wolf, S., Broelz, E. K., Keune, P. M., Wesa, B., Hautzinger, M., Birbaumer, N., & Strehl, U. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.01.007 · Cited by 85
Alleviating Choking: The Sounds of Distraction
Mesagno, C., Marchant, D., & Morris, T. (2009) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200902795091 · Cited by 99
“Recently, significant conceptual advances have been made in an attempt to explain the primary mechanisms relevant to choking (see Beilock & Carr, 2001; Beilock, Kulp, Holt, & Carr, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialOverthinking skilled motor performance: Or why those who teach can’t do
Flegal, K. E., & Anderson, M. C. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.5.927 · Cited by 80
“One consequence of such a change is that performance might suffer when experts attend to the elementary steps of their proceduralized skill during execution (e.g., Baumeister, 1984; Beilock & Carr, 2001; Lewis & Linder, 1997).”
BackgroundGrierson, L. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9504-x · Cited by 88
Frank, C., Land, W. M., & Schack, T. (2012) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.001 · Cited by 80
Methodological Review and Evaluation of Research in Expert Performance in Sport
Hodges, N. J., Huys, R., & Starkes, J. L. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118270011.ch7 · Cited by 81
Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments
Sülzenbrück, S., & Heuer, H. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.001 · Cited by 79
Do Demanding Conditions Help or Hurt Self‐Regulation?
Koole, S. L., Jostmann, N. B., & Baumann, N. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00425.x · Cited by 77
“Choking is a paradoxical phenomenon in which raising the importance of success leads people to perform more poorly than might be expected given their level of skill (Baumeister & Showers, 1986; Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialRefining and regaining skills in fixation/diversification stage performers: the Five-A Model
Carson, H. J., & Collins, D. J. (2011) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2011.613682 · Cited by 85
“Two prominent self-focus theories to date are the Explicit Monitoring Hypothesis (EMH; Beilock & Carr, 2001) and the Conscious Processing Hypothesis (CPH; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundNursing Students’ Anxiety and Clinical Performance
Cheung, R. Y.-M., & Au, T. K.-F. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20110131-08 · Cited by 84
Rationalizing flow: agency in skilled unreflective action
Brownstein, M. (2013) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0143-5 · Cited by 77
“23 Payton, Kim, and Bird are reporting what Beilock and Carr (2001) call ''expertise-induced amnesia.''”
BackgroundAdopting an External Focus of Attention Enhances Musical Performance
Mornell, A., & Wulf, G. (2018) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429418801573 · Cited by 83
“Multiple lines of inquiry have identified self-focused attention as detrimental to performance (e.g., self-focus, Baumeister, 1984; explicit monitoring, Beilock & Carr, 2001; skill-focused attention, Gray, 2004; internal focus of attention, Wulf, 2013).”
BackgroundLee, T. G., & Grafton, S. T. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.058 · Cited by 85
“In controlled laboratory environments, performance decrements under pressure is induced on a wide range of sensorimotor tasks including golf putting (Beilock and Carr, 2001), bimanual coordination (Baumeister, 1984), and a variety of novel motor tasks (Mobbs et al., 2009; Chib et al., 2012).”
BackgroundNovel methods of instruction in ACL injury prevention programs, a systematic review
Benjaminse, A., Welling, W., Otten, B., & Gokeler, A. (2014) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.06.003 · Cited by 76
Self-Presentation Origins of Choking: Evidence From Separate Pressure Manipulations
Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.3.441 · Cited by 75
ACL injury prevention, more effective with a different way of motor learning?
Benjaminse, A., & Otten, E. (2010) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1313-z · Cited by 75
“Motor skills that are acquired explicitly tend to be less resilient under psychological [7, 18, 19, 32, 39] and physiological fatigue [31, 54], tend to interfere with the normal automatic”
BackgroundLohse, K. R. (2011) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.001 · Cited by 75
A framework of innovative learning for skill development in complex operational tasks
Hou, L., Chi, H.-L., Tarng, W., Chai, J., Panuwatwanich, K., & Wang, X. (2017) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.001 · Cited by 75
Performance Breakdown in Sport
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Poolton, J. (2006) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2006.10599360 · Cited by 72
“This study used a camera to induce self-focus and promote reinvestment, a technique successfully used in previous studies (Beilock & Carr, 2001; Lewis & Linder, 1997; Liao & Masters, 2002; Gray, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChoking under pressure in front of a supportive audience: Evidence from professional biathlon
Harb-Wu, K., & Krumer, A. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.09.001 · Cited by 72
“For example, Beilock and Carr (2001) presented evidence on the explicit monitoring theory based on putting in golf that represents a complex sensorimotor task, which is best performed when executed as an automated action.”
BackgroundA balanced view of mindfulness at work
Choi, E., Gruman, J. A., & Leonard, C. (2021) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866211036930 · Cited by 80
“Other evidence for the idea that mindfulness may undermine adaptive unconscious processes comes from the literature on skilled performance which demonstrates that trying to exert conscious control over automated behaviors can be counterproductive (Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundEffective practice and instruction: A skill acquisition framework for excellence
Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2023) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2023.2240630 · Cited by 101
“…to infer changes in “efficiency” related to attentional resources, such as assessments of dribbling speed in football or ice hockey when players are simultaneously counting backwards or trying to memorise spatial positions (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Ford et al., 2005; Runswick et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMissed Shots at the Free-Throw Line
Toma, M. (2017) · Journal of Sports Economics · doi:10.1177/1527002515593779 · Cited by 68
“It might be hypothesized that earlier in the season the import of a win is lower or the lack of practice renders the shooting of a free throw less internalized and, in turn, less susceptible to the choking effect (Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundDevelopment and validation of the Decision-Specific Reinvestment Scale
Kinrade, N. P., Jackson, R. C., Ashford, K. J., & Bishop, D. T. (2010) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.499439 · Cited by 71
“Selffocus or reinvestment theories of choking propose that, under pressure, performers consciously attempt to focus their attention on the process of how to perform the task, thus disrupting the normal automatic processing of the task (Masters, 1992; Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundGeukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2011) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.004 · Cited by 79
Öneş, D. S., Dilchert, S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199732579.013.0010 · Cited by 72
Interactive expertise in solo and joint musical performance
Høffding, S., & Satne, G. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02339-x · Cited by 70
Nieuwenhuys, A., Cañal‐Bruland, R., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2838 · Cited by 69
“…to which threatening situations elicit anxiety is known to be highly individual, we performed a within-subject manipulation of threat (see also Baumeister, 1984; Beilock & Carr, 2001; Cañal-Bruland, Pijpers, & Oudejans, 2010; Causer, Holmes, Smith, & Williams, 2011; Wilson, Vine, & Wood, 2009).”
Beyond the playing field: sport psychology meets embodied cognition
Beilock, S. L. (2008) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/17509840701836875 · Cited by 72
“By turning to sport science work centering around differences in the cognitive operations supporting expert and novice performers (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2001; Beilock et al., 2002; Beilock et al., 2004), we are able to address such issues.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPapineau, D. (2015) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9383-x · Cited by 68
“…make Phenom Cogn Sci (2015) 14:295–308 DOI 10.1007/s11097-014-9383-x 1On the habitualist side are Dreyfus (2005, 2007a, b), Beilock (2007, 2010) and (Beilock and Carr 2001, 2004; Beilock et al. 2002); intellectualism is defended in various ways by McDowell (2007), Stanley (2011), Sutton (2007),…”
BackgroundInfluentialSmith, J. L., & Johnson, C. S. (2006) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2801_5 · Cited by 67
“Choking is particularly likely to occur when high expectations are accompanied by self-focus (Lewis & Linder, 1997) or explicit monitoring of performance behaviors (Beilock & Carr, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialMotor creativity: the roles of attention breadth and working memory in a divergent doing task
Moraru, A., Memmert, D., & van der Kamp, J. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1201084 · Cited by 67
“…would be that even though motor skills are normally executed implicitly, performing new or unlearned skills requires a high degree of conscious control and active involvement of working memory (e.g. Abernethy, Maxwell, Masters, van der Kamp, & Jackson, 2007; Beilock & Carr, 2001; Masters, 1992).”
BackgroundThe self: Your own worst enemy? A test of the self-invoking trigger hypothesis
McKay, B., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Nordin, A. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.997765 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- Beilock, Sian L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 701-725
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2151259821
- Cited by
- 1,201
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- choking under pressure, procedural memory, proceduralization, golf putting, episodic memory, dual-task training, mental arithmetic, attentional control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Psychomotor Performance, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review