Cited by 221Aging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Behavioral inhibition and amplification during emotional arousal: a comparison of two age groups

Kunzmann, Ute, Kupperbusch, Cenita S., Levenson, Robert W.·2005·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

This study investigated age differences in the ability to suppress and amplify expressive behavior during emotional arousal. Young and old participants viewed 3 film clips about medical procedures while their behavioral, autonomic, and subjective responses were recorded. Half of the participants viewed all 3 films without additional instructions; the other half was asked to suppress and amplify their behavioral expression during the 2nd and 3rd films. Except for heart rate, suppression and amplification produced similar patterns of autonomic activation. Neither suppression nor amplification had effects on self-reported emotion. There were no age differences in the ability to suppress or amplify emotional expression or in their physiological or subjective consequences. Considering that older people's unregulated reactivity was lower than that of young adults, suppression may have been easier and amplification more difficult for older adults. Voluntary emotion regulation might be one domain of human performance that is spared from age-related losses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.144

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of emotion suppression on increased sympathetic activation of the cardiovascular system has been replicated across age, gender, and type of emotion elicited.

    “This effect has been replicated across age, gender, and type of emotion elicited (Gross & Levenson, 1997; Kunzmann, Kupperbusch, & Levenson, 2005; Robinson & Demaree, 2007).”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Kunzmann, Kupperbusch, & Levenson, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunzmann, U., Kupperbusch, C. S., & Levenson, R. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2005-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
144-158
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2019893194
Cited by
221
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R37AG017766, AG17766)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
behavioral inhibition, emotional suppression, age differences, emotional arousal, autonomic reactivity, heart rate, subjective emotional experience, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arousal, Body Temperature, Fingers, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review