Cited by 174Emotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Turn down the volume or change the channel? Emotional effects of detached versus positive reappraisal

Open access
Shiota, Michelle N., Levenson, Robert W.·2012·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal, or changing one's interpretation of an event in order to alter the emotional response to it, is thought to be a healthy and an effective emotion regulation strategy. Although researchers recognize several distinct varieties of reappraisal, few studies have explicitly compared the effects of multiple reappraisal strategies on emotional responding. The present study compares the effects of detached and positive reappraisal on thought content, subjective emotional experience, physiological reactivity, and facial expressions of emotion while viewing film clips evoking sadness and disgust. Although both forms of reappraisal reduced overall emotional responding to unpleasant stimuli, the effects of detached reappraisal were stronger in this regard, and positive reappraisal was more likely to maintain subjective experience and facial expression of stimulus-appropriate positive emotions. The two reappraisal strategies also produced somewhat different profiles of physiological responding. Differences between detached and positive reappraisal with respect to subjective experience and facial expression were more pronounced among men than women; the reverse was true for differences with respect to physiological responding. Beyond these effects on individual emotion response systems, detached and positive reappraisal also had somewhat different effects on coherence in change across response systems. Implications for our understanding of emotion regulation processes, and for emotion theory more broadly, are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029208

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reappraisal decreases the experience of negative emotion and the associated sympathetic response.

    “Reappraisal was shown to decrease the experience of negative emotion (e.g., [23,24,25,26,27]) and of the associated sympathetic response (e.g., [24,25,27]).”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that detached reappraisal reduced subjective emotional experience and physiological signs of distress. But the Results > Physiological Reactivity (page unavailable) found no significant overall effect on physiological reactivity: both strategies generally reduced it among men, while positive reappraisal tended to increase cardiac reactivity among women. The unqualified claim that reappraisal decreases the associated sympathetic response overstates these findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Experimental evidence indicates that positively reappraising negative events enhances positive affectivity and psychological well-being.

    “experimental evidence indicates that positively reappraising negative events enhances positive affectivity and psychological well-being [21,54,55]”

    From Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data (2017) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Discussion reports that positive reappraisal tended to produce a more positive balance of affect, and the Conclusion says it maintained positive emotions during distressing stimuli. But the study does not demonstrate enhanced psychological well-being; the Conclusion presents that as a possible longer-term benefit, while the well-being associations described in “Detached Versus Positive Reappraisal” come from self-report studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ekman P Friesen WV Facial action coding system 1978 Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, California
  2. Eschenbeck H Kohlmann C-W Lohaus A Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents Journal of Individual Differences 2007 28 1 18 26
  3. Richards JM Gross JJ Composure at any cost? The cognitive consequences of emotion suppression Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1999 25 8 1033 1044
  4. Richards JM Gross JJ Personality and emotional memory: How regulating emotion impairs memory for emotional events Journal of Research in Personality 2006 40 5 631 651
  5. Scherer KR The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997 73 5 902 922

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2012-09
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
416-429
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2067744094
Cited by
174
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Aging (AG17766)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive reappraisal, positive reappraisal, emotion regulation, sadness, disgust, emotional facial expressions, physiological reactivity, subjective emotional experience, gender differences, thought content, emotion theory
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Electrocardiography, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Sex Factors, Thinking, Young Adult, Arterial Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review