The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Abstract
A primary goal of scale development is to create a valid measure of an underlying construct. We discuss theoretical principles, practical issues, and pragmatic decisions to help developers maximize the construct validity of scales and subscales. First, it is essential to begin with a clear conceptualization of the target construct. Moreover, the content of the initial item pool should be overinclusive and item wording needs careful attention. Next, the item pool should be tested, along with variables that assess closely related constructs, on a heterogeneous sample representing the entire range of the target population. Finally, in selecting scale items, the goal is unidimensionality rather than internal consistency ; this means that virtually all interitem correlations should be moderate in magnitude. Factor analysis can play a crucial role in ensuring the unidimensionality and discriminant validity of scales.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the intercorrelation between the two factors is .5, which also suggests that the two factors represent the same construct (Clark & Watson, 1995).”
From Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance (2011) · cites this paper as Clark & Watson, 1995
In the citing paper
“All items achieved values above the recommended 0.20, which makes it possible, despite the lower Cronbach’s alpha indices compared to the original version, to consider the MIS-PL a tool with acceptable reliability (Clark and Watson, 1995).”
From Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS-PL) (2024) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson, 1995
In the citing paper
“An additional analysis of the item-total correlation matrix showed that all items achieved values above the recommended 0.20 (Clark and Watson, 1995).”
From Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS-PL) (2024) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson, 1995
In the citing paper
“As the process of writing items for any self-report questionnaire requires authors to define or conceptualize the construct they are attempting to measure (Clark & Watson, 1995)”
From Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness (2006) · cites this paper as Clark & Watson, 1995
In the citing paper
“The average inter-item correlation (0.20) was acceptable according to Clark and Watson (1995)”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson (1995)
In the citing paper
“We chose these two tools, instead of traditional measures of internal consistency (i.e., Cronbach's Alpha [Cronbach, 1951] or KR-20 for dichotomous data [Kuder and Richardson, 1937]) because unlike traditional estimates which do not assess homogeneity (Cortina, 1993; Clark and Watson, 1995), omega and CFA, simultaneously provide estimates of both.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson, 1995
In the citing paper
“however the range of inter-item correlations (−0.07 to 0.36) still falls outside of their recommendations.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson (1995)
In the citing paper
“The average inter-item correlation, as well as the range of inter-item correlations, are outside the range recommended by Clark and Watson (1995) for sufficient internal consistency (recommended values range from 0.15 to 0.50).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson, 1995
In the citing paper
“however the range of inter-item correlations (-0.07 to 0.59) still falls outside of their recommendation.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson (1995)
In the citing paper
“The average inter-item correlation (0.18) is acceptable according to Clark and Watson (1995)”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Clark and Watson (1995)
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810
Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465 · Cited by 4,636
Self-citationHandbook of Personality : Theory and Research
Pervin, L. A. (1992) · Cited by 4,543
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Fundamentals of item response theory
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4185 · Cited by 3,420
Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 · Cited by 2,880
Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.238 · Cited by 2,387
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,054
The Reliability and Validity of Pain Interference Measures in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Raichle, K. A., Osborne, T. L., Jensen, M. P., & Cardenas, D. D. (2006) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.10.007 · Cited by 138
Vaughan, M. D., & Waehler, C. A. (2009) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9084-9 · Cited by 137
Aldana, A., Bañales, J., & Richards-Schuster, K. E. (2019) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-019-00113-1 · Cited by 141
Personality Traits in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Serapio‐García, G., Safdari, M., Crepy, C., Sun, L., Fitz, S., Abdulhai, M., Faust, A., & Matarić, M. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3296728/v1 · Cited by 137
Kraus, S. W., Potenza, M. N., Martino, S., & Grant, J. E. (2015) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.02.007 · Cited by 141
Reading Motivation: Multidimensional and Indeterminate.
Watkins, M. W., & Coffey, D. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.110 · Cited by 136
Interpersonal Mindfulness: Scale Development and Initial Construct Validation
Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1057-2 · Cited by 161
Family resilience and psychological distress in the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study.
Eales, L., Ferguson, G. M., Gillespie, S., Smoyer, S., & Carlson, S. M. (2021) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001221 · Cited by 154
Preschoolers’ Emotion Expression and Regulation: Relations with School Adjustment
Herndon, K. J., Bailey, C. S., Shewark, E. A., Denham, S. A., & Bassett, H. H. (2013) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.2012.759525 · Cited by 155
Howard, M. C., & Henderson, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113328 · Cited by 134
Cross-Validation of Levenson's Psychopathy Scale in a Sample of Federal Female Inmates
Brinkley, C. A., Diamond, P. M., Magaletta, P. R., & Heigel, C. P. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191108319043 · Cited by 134
Substance abuse and psychological flexibility: the development of a new measure
Luoma, J., Drake, C. E., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Hayes, S. C. (2011) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.3109/16066359.2010.524956 · Cited by 131
Sandstrom, G. M., & Russo, F. (2011) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735611422508 · Cited by 134
Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21457 · Cited by 157
Bearden, W. O., Money, R. B., & Nevins, J. L. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.008 · Cited by 133
Chmielewski, M. S., & Watson, D. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.117.2.364 · Cited by 132
Self-citationDevelopment and validation of the Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-VA
Clark, M. E., Gironda, R. J., & Young, R. W. (2003) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2003.09.0381 · Cited by 132
Chorpita, B. F., Reise, S. P., Weisz, J. R., Grubbs, K. M., Becker, K. D., & Krull, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019602 · Cited by 132
Psychometric and measurement properties of concussion assessment tools in youth sports.
McLeod, T. C. V., Barr, W., McCrea, M., & Guskiewicz, K. M. (2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 132
The Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale: Initial Validation Study
Chaudhuri, К. R., Schrag, A. E., Weintraub, D. A., Rizos, A., Rodríguez‐Blázquez, C., Mamikonyan, E., & Martínez‐Martín, P. (2019) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.27862 · Cited by 129
Sleep Health as Measured by RU SATED: A Psychometric Evaluation
Ravyts, S. G., Dzierzewski, J. M., Perez, E., Donovan, E. K., & Dautovich, N. D. (2019) · Behavioral Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1080/15402002.2019.1701474 · Cited by 145
Does age make a difference? Predicting physical activity of South Koreans.
Renner, B., Spivak, Y., Kwon, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2007) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.482 · Cited by 148
Initial Development and Validation of the School Belongingness Scale
Arslan, G., & Duru, E. (2016) · Child Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s12187-016-9414-y · Cited by 154
Refining the conceptualization of Brand Authenticity
Akbar, M. M., & Wymer, W. (2017) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-016-0023-3 · Cited by 138
Managing validity versus reliability trade-offs in scale-building decisions.
Clifton, J. D. W. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000236 · Cited by 147
The mentor-youth alliance: The role of mentoring relationships in promoting youth competence
Zand, D. H., Thomson, N., Cervantes, R., Espiritu, R., Klagholz, D., LaBlanc, L., & Taylor, A. (2009) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.12.006 · Cited by 130
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., Köller, M. M., & Klusmann, U. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892 · Cited by 216
Winter, S. J., Stylianou, A. C., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-004-1772-6 · Cited by 129
Korte, K. J., Capron, D. W., Zvolensky, M. J., & Schmidt, N. B. (2012) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.10.013 · Cited by 128
Building a Social and Motivational Framework for Understanding Satisfaction in Online Learning
Lin, Y., Lin, G.-Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.38.1.a · Cited by 128
Wirtz, J. G., & Zimbres, T. M. (2018) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2018.1455146 · Cited by 128
Watson, D., & Wu, K. D. (2005) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191104271483 · Cited by 131
Self-citationMeasuring Lay Conceptions of Well-Being: The Beliefs About Well-Being Scale
McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2010) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9194-x · Cited by 137
Petschnig, M., Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2014) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.001 · Cited by 126
Haugan, G., Drageset, J., André, B., Kukulu, K., Mugisha, J., & Utvær, B. K. S. (2020) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1245-3 · Cited by 130
Perry, S., Murphy, M. C., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.007 · Cited by 132
Lawrence, J., Fauerbach, J. A., Heinberg, L. J., Doctor, M. E., & Thombs, B. D. (2006) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.106 · Cited by 133
Job Functions and Knowledge Requirements of Certified Rehabilitation Counselors in the 21st Century
Leahy, M. J., Chan, F. H., & Saunders, J. L. (2003) · Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin · doi:10.1177/00343552030460020101 · Cited by 126
Pervan, S., Bove, L. L., & Johnson, L. W. (2008) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.11.001 · Cited by 130
van der Meulen, M. J., John, M. T., Naeije, M., & Lobbezoo, F. (2008) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-11 · Cited by 130
Construct, item, and method bias of cognitive and personality tests in South Africa
Meiring, D., van de Vijver, A. J. R., Rothmann, S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v31i1.182 · Cited by 126
Baker, T. B., Breslau, N., Covey, L. S., & Shiffman, S. S. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03657.x · Cited by 124
Top management credibility and employee cynicism: A comprehensive model
Kim, T.-Y., Bateman, T. S., Gilbreath, B., & Andersson, L. M. (2009) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726709340822 · Cited by 123
Avoiding Theoretical Stagnation: A Systematic Review and Framework for Measuring Public Value
Faulkner, N., & Kaufman, S. (2017) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12251 · Cited by 154
Betsch, C., Habersaat, K. B., Deshevoi, S., Heinemeier, D., Briko, N. I., Kostenko, N. A., Kocik, J., BOHM, R. M., Zettler, I., Wiysonge, C. S., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034869 · Cited by 123
The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale–Revised: An examination of a reduced-item version
Fergus, T. A., & Valentiner, D. P. (2009) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.02.009 · Cited by 123
Initial Validation of the Children’s Worry Management Scale
Zeman, J. L., Cassano, M. C., Suveg, C. M., & Shipman, K. (2009) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9308-4 · Cited by 135
The ‘Short Five’ (S5): Measuring Personality Traits Using Comprehensive Single Items
Konstabel, K., Lönnqvist, J., Walkowitz, G., Konstabel, K., & Verkasalo, M. (2012) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.813 · Cited by 121
Heidenreich, S., Spieth, P., & Petschnig, M. (2017) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12364 · Cited by 122
McKay, M. T., & Andretta, J. R. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.071 · Cited by 122
Walsh, J. L. (2018) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2371-3 · Cited by 126
The development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory-15
Zhang, X., Wang, M., He, L., Jie, L., & Deng, J. S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221621 · Cited by 133
Rendas‐Baum, R., Bloudek, L. M., Maglinte, G. A., & Varon, S. F. (2012) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0230-7 · Cited by 121
Luebbe, A. M., Mancini, K. J., Kiel, E. J., Spangler, B. R., Semlak, J. L., & Fussner, L. M. (2018) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191116665907 · Cited by 121
Psychometric properties of the Prolonged Grief Disorder-13 (PG-13) in bereaved Swedish parents
Pohlkamp, L., Kreicbergs, U., Prigerson, H. G., & Sveen, J. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.004 · Cited by 120
Clark, L. A., & Ro, E. (2014) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/per0000063 · Cited by 128
Self-citationBerger, R., & Hänze, M. (2014) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.985757 · Cited by 136
Goldman, Z. W., Goodboy, A. K., & Weber, K. (2016) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2016.1215338 · Cited by 162
A Five–Factor Theory Perspective on Causal Analysis
McCrae, R. R., & Sutin, A. R. (2018) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2134 · Cited by 139
What's to Fear from Immigrants? Creating an Assimilationist Threat Scale
Paxton, P. M., & Mughan, A. (2006) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00520.x · Cited by 119
The Janus face of Facebook: Positive and negative sides of social networking site use
Mäntymäki, M., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.078 · Cited by 119
Porter, C., Favara, M., Hittmeyer, A., Scott, D., Sánchez, A., Revathi, E., Woldehanna, T., Duc, L. T., Craske, M. G., & Stein, A. L. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049653 · Cited by 145
Development of a Poststroke Checklist to Standardize Follow-up Care for Stroke Survivors
Philp, I., Brainin, M., Walker, M. F., Ward, A. B., Gillard, P. J., Shields, A. L., & Norrving, B. G. (2012) · Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016 · Cited by 119
SHIFTING JOURNALISTIC CAPITAL?
Hellmueller, L., Vos, T. P., & Poepsel, M. A. (2012) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2012.697686 · Cited by 118
Khumalo, I. P., Temane, Q. M., & Wissing, M. P. (2011) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9777-2 · Cited by 139
The role of guilt in the development of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review
Pugh, L., Taylor, P. J., & Berry, K. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.026 · Cited by 119
Maindal, H. T., Sokolowski, I., & Vedsted, P. (2009) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-209 · Cited by 119
Migration and relationship power among mexican women
Parrado, E. A., Flippen, C. A., & McQuiston, C. M. (2005) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2005.0016 · Cited by 118
Pincus, A. L. (2011) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/a0021191 · Cited by 121
Edens, J. F., Skopp, N. A., & Cahill, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410801955938 · Cited by 117
Raineri, A. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1155163 · Cited by 134
A Survey of Emerging Concepts and Challenges for QoE Management of Multimedia Services
Skorin-Kapov, L., Varela, M., Hoßfeld, T., & Chen, K.-T. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications · doi:10.1145/3176648 · Cited by 116
Semerari, A., Cucchi, M., Dimaggio, G., Cavadini, D., Carcione, A., Battelli, V., Nicolò, G., Pedone, R., Siccardi, T., D′Angerio, S., et al. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.015 · Cited by 118
Psychometric properties of the Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey
Presson, A. P., Zhang, C., Abtahi, A. M., Kean, J. T., Hung, M., & Tyser, A. R. (2017) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0610-3 · Cited by 116
Humphris, G. M., Watson, E. K., Sharpe, M., & Özakinci, G. (2018) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0850-x · Cited by 124
Validation of a Brief Pornography Screen across multiple samples
Kraus, S. W., Gola, M. K., Grubbs, J. B., Kowalewska, E., Hoff, R. A., Lew‐Starowicz, M., Martino, S., Shirk, S. D., & Potenza, M. N. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00038 · Cited by 125
The use of concept mapping for scale development and validation in evaluation
Rosas, S. R., & Camphausen, L. C. (2007) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.003 · Cited by 117
Osman, A., Gutierrez, P. M., Smith, K. D., Fang, Q., Lozano, G., & Devine, A. (2010) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890903379332 · Cited by 139
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire
Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J. I., Li, Z., Morton, K., Keith, S. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105310364175 · Cited by 128
Herman, B. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21433 · Cited by 104
Developing and Validating the Communication Resilience Processes Scale
Wilson, S. R., Kuang, K., Hintz, E. A., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqab013 · Cited by 119
Human resource developments with the touch of artificial intelligence: a scale development study
Kambur, E., & Akar, C. (2021) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-04-2021-0216 · Cited by 163
Psychometric Characteristics of the Parenting Scale in a Head Start Population
Reitman, D. S., Currier, R. O., Hupp, S. D. A., Rhode, P. C., Murphy, M. A., & O’Callaghan, P. M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3004_08 · Cited by 115
The discriminant (and convergent) validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5.
Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Rojas, S. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2015) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/per0000118 · Cited by 114
Psychometrics of the Zarit Burden Interview in Caregivers of Patients With Heart Failure
Al-Rawashdeh, S. Y., Lennie, T. A., & Chung, M. L. (2016) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000348 · Cited by 114
Food as Ideology: Measurement and Validation of Locavorism
Reich, B. J., Beck, J. T., & Price, J. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy027 · Cited by 120
Bozionelos, N., Lin, C.-H. V., & Lee, K. Y. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103333 · Cited by 133
Ormhaug, S. M., Jensen, T. K., Wentzel-Larsen, T., & Shirk, S. R. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033884 · Cited by 113
Puckett, J. A., Newcomb, M. E., Ryan, D. T., Swann, G., Garofalo, R., & Mustanski, B. S. (2016) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0258-5 · Cited by 131
Dynamic marketing capabilities view on creating market change
Kachouie, R., Mavondo, F., & Sands, S. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2016-0588 · Cited by 113
Vlahović, S., Sužnjević, M., & Skorin‐Kapov, L. (2022) · Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces · doi:10.1007/s12193-022-00388-0 · Cited by 118
Rothmann, S., & Joubert, J. H. M. (2007) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v38i3.588 · Cited by 113
Creating an Instrument to Measure Leadership, Change, and Synthesis in Engineering Undergraduates
Ahn, B., Cox, M., London, J., Çekiç, O., & Zhu, J. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20036 · Cited by 112
The development and validation of the Contemporary Critical Consciousness Measure.
Shin, R. Q., Ezeofor, I., Smith, L. C., Welch, J. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2016) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000137 · Cited by 135
Girls' and boys' experience with teen sexting in early and late adolescence
Ševčíková, A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.06.007 · Cited by 122
Wilson, J., Ward, C. A., Fetvadjiev, V. H., & Bethel, A. (2017) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022117732721 · Cited by 112
Residents' attitude as determinant of tourism sustainability: The case of Trujillo
López, M. F. B., Virto, N. R., Manzano, J. A., & de Madariaga, J. G. (2018) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.02.002 · Cited by 125
El‐Den, S., Schneider, C. R., Mirzaei, A., & Carter, S. (2020) · International Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1111/ijpp.12600 · Cited by 125
A Viable Model and Self-Report Measure of Spiritual Intelligence
King, D. B., & DeCicco, T. L. (2009) · International Journal of Transpersonal Studies · doi:10.24972/ijts.2010.28.1.68 · Cited by 112
Guilt: Elaboration of a Multidimensional Model
Kubany, E. S., & Watson, S. B. (2012) · OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, L. A., & Watson, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2005364767
- Cited by
- 6,567
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 393 · 2025: 319 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 337 · 2021: 455 · 2020: 420 · 2019: 404 · 2018: 432 · 2017: 359 · 2016: 357 · 2015: 352 · 2014: 353 · 2013: 269 · 2012: 248
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- construct validity, scale development, item pool, item wording, unidimensionality, internal consistency, factor analysis, discriminant validity, subscales, construct conceptualization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
