The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory and self-report assessments of impulsive behavior in adolescent daily smokers and nonsmokers.
Abstract
This research compared adolescent daily smokers (n=25) and nonsmokers (n=26) on different measures of impulsivity. Assessments included question-based measures of delay (DDQ) and probability (PDQ) discounting, a measure of behavioral disinhibition (go-stop task), and a self-report measure of impulsivity (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Adolescent). Adolescent smokers were more impulsive on the DDQ and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale--Adolescent but not on the PDQ or the go-stop task. However, there was a significant interaction between smoking status and gender on the go-stop task, with male smokers performing less impulsively on this measure than male nonsmokers--an effect not observed with the female adolescents. These findings indicate that adolescents who smoke cigarettes are more impulsive with respect to some, but not all, types of impulsivity than are adolescents who do not smoke.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Extensive evidence links smoking with greater delay discounting in adolescents150,151 and adults.152–158”
From Early life adversity and health-risk behaviors: Proposed psychological and neural mechanisms (2018) · cites this paper as [150]
Citations
Cites
Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
Commons, M. L., Mazur, J., Nevin, J. A., & Rachlin, H. C. (1987) · doi:10.4324/9781315825502-11 · Cited by 1,842
A Discounting Framework for Choice With Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769 · Cited by 1,676
AREA UNDER THE CURVE AS A MEASURE OF DISCOUNTING
Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235 · Cited by 1,545
Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control
Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00545.x · Cited by 1,471
Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison
Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x · Cited by 1,165
Rubia, K., Overmeyer, S., Taylor, E., Brammer, M., Williams, S. C. R., Simmons, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.891 · Cited by 1,010
Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures
Reynolds, B. A., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.024 · Cited by 947
Self-citationMeasures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers
Mitchell, S. H. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/pl00005491 · Cited by 911
DELAY OR PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING IN A MODEL OF IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR: EFFECT OF ALCOHOL
Richards, J. B., Zhang, L., Mitchell, S. H., & de Wit, H. (1999) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis.
Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021591 · Cited by 866
The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse
Perry, J. L., & Carroll, M. E. (2008) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1173-0 · Cited by 805
Sharma, L., Markon, K. E., & Clark, L. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0034418 · Cited by 630
Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Koffarnus, M. N., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.004 · Cited by 604
de Ruiter, M. B., Veltman, D. J., Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Sjoerds, Z., & van den Brink, W. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2008.175 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, B., Patak, M., Shroff, P., Penfold, R. B., Melanko, S., & Duhig, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Abigail Wexner Research Institute (US)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- ORCID
- Penfold, Robert B.
- Venue
- Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264-271
- ISSN
- 1064-1297 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2293
- OpenAlex
- W2005325346
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21 DA020423)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- adolescent smoking, impulsivity, delay discounting, probability discounting, behavioral disinhibition, gender differences, tobacco use
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Personality Tests, Probability, Self-Assessment, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
