Cited by 7,678Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 269 of the 269 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bad is Stronger than Good

Abstract

The greater power of bad events over good ones is found in everyday events, major life events (e.g., trauma), close relationship outcomes, social network patterns, interpersonal interactions, and learning processes. Bad emotions, bad parents, and bad feedback have more impact than good ones, and bad information is processed more thoroughly than good. The self is more motivated to avoid bad self-definitions than to pursue good ones. Bad impressions and bad stereotypes are quicker to form and more resistant to disconfirmation than good ones. Various explanations such as diagnosticity and salience help explain some findings, but the greater power of bad events is still found when such variables are controlled. Hardly any exceptions (indicating greater power of good) can be found. Taken together, these findings suggest that bad is stronger than good, as a general principle across a broad range of psychological phenomena.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

Cites

269 of 269 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 257 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bradley M. M., 1997, Affective norms for English words
  3. BrownJ. S. (1940). Generalized approach and avoidance responses in relation to conflict behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
  4. Czapinski J., 1986, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 17, 155
  5. 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Fiske S. T., 1980, Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 22, 889
  7. Fiske S. T., 1991, Social cognition
  8. Gilovich T., 1991, How we know what isn't so
  9. Gottman J. M., 1979, Marital interaction
  10. Gottman J. M., 1986, Behavioral Assessment, 8, 31
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.639 · DOI
  12. Matlin M. W., 1978, The pollyanna principle
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.793 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.528 · DOI
  15. Penney R. K., 1968, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 140
  16. Reyes G. M., 1999, Just (don't) talk: Comparing the impact of interaction style on sexual desire and social attraction
  17. Shah J., 1999, The regulatory focus and goal organization: Implications for self-regulation
  18. Skowronski J. J., 1989, Psychological Review, 105, 131
  19. 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Thompson L. A., 1999, Differences in the heritability of general intelligence across levels of father's occupation
  21. 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7,678

Metadata

Authors
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Baumeister, Roy F.
  • Bratslavsky, Ellen
  • Vohs, Kathleen D.
Venue
Review of General Psychology
Published
2001-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
323-370
ISSN
  • 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1552
OpenAlex
W2158810025
Cited by
7,678
References
257
Citations by year
2026: 527 · 2025: 532 · 2024: 486 · 2023: 458 · 2022: 461 · 2021: 564 · 2020: 516 · 2019: 480 · 2018: 443 · 2017: 415 · 2016: 395 · 2015: 395 · 2014: 366 · 2013: 318 · 2012: 277
FWCI
33.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
negativity bias, emotional valence, negative emotions, self-avoidance, impression formation, stereotype formation, diagnosticity, salience, major life events, trauma, close relationships, social networks, learning process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review