Cited by 156Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Controllable versus uncontrollable stressors bi-directionally modulate conditioned but not innate fear

Open access
Baratta, M.V., Christianson, J.P., Gomez, D.M., Zarza, C.M., Amat, J., Masini, C.V., Watkins, L.R., Maier, S.F.·2007·Neuroscience

Abstract

Fear conditioning and fear extinction play key roles in the development and treatment of anxiety-related disorders, yet there is little information concerning experiential variables that modulate these processes. Here we examined the impact of exposure to a stressor in a different environment on subsequent fear conditioning and extinction, and whether the degree of behavioral control that the subject has over the stressor is of importance. Rats received a session of either escapable (controllable) tail shock (ES), yoked inescapable (uncontrollable) tail shock (IS), or control treatment (home cage, HC) 7 days before fear conditioning in which a tone and foot shock were paired. Conditioning was measured 24 h later. In a second experiment rats received ES, IS or HC 24 h after contextual fear conditioning. Extinction then occurred every day beginning 7 days later until a criterion was reached. Spontaneous recovery of fear was assessed 14 days after extinction. IS potentiated fear conditioning when given before fear conditioning, and potentiated fear responding during extinction when given after conditioning. Importantly, ES potently interfered with later fear conditioning, decreased fear responding during fear extinction, and prevented spontaneous recovery of fear. Additionally, we examined if the activation of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFCv) by ES is critical for the protective effects of ES on later fear conditioning. Inactivation of the mPFCv with muscimol at the time of the initial experience with control prevented ES-induced reductions in later contextual and auditory fear conditioning. Finally, we explored if the protective effects of ES extended to an unconditioned fear stimulus, ferret odor. Unlike conditioned fear, prior ES increased the fear response to ferret odor to the same degree as did IS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.042

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior rodent research has demonstrated that behavioral control over an aversive stimulus reduces Pavlovian threat responses, even when control is no longer possible, and involves the vmPFC and striatum.

    “Prior rodent research has demonstrated that behavioral control over an aversive stimulus reduces Pavlovian threat responses, even when control is no longer possible, and involves the vmPFC and striatum (Baratta et al., 2007; Cain and LeDoux, 2007; Moscarello and LeDoux, 2013; Ramirez et al., 2015).”
  • Our finding of a between-group difference in vmPFC BOLD signal during cue presentation in late Avoidance/Extinction and Retrieval (at an uncorrected threshold) is consistent with the rodent literature suggesting a key role for the vmPFC in avoidance learning and its subsequent behavioral consequences.

    “Our finding of a between-group difference in vmPFC BOLD signal during cue presentation in late Avoidance/Extinction and Retrieval (at an uncorrected threshold) is also consistent with the rodent literature suggesting a key role for the vmPFC in avoidance learning and its subsequent behavioral consequences (Baratta et al., 2007; Moscarello and LeDoux, 2013).”
  • Research in rats has suggested that vmPFC activity may mediate the persistent effects of behavioral control on reduction of Pavlovian responses.

    “Research in rats has suggested that vmPFC activity may mediate the persistent effects of behavioral control on reduction of Pavlovian responses (Baratta et al., 2007; Moscarello and LeDoux, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baratta, M. V., Christianson, J. P., Gomez, D. M., Zarza, C. M., Amat, J., Masini, C. V., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
146
Issue
4
Pages
1495-1503
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078066808
Cited by
156
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH050479, R37MH050479, MH 075213, F31MH075213, R01MH050479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
fear conditioning, fear extinction, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, muscimol inactivation, contextual fear, auditory fear, innate fear, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Association Learning, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Electroshock, Escape Reaction, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Helplessness, Learned, Male, Muscimol, Stress, Physiological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, GABA Agonists, Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review