Cited by 253Family and Disability Support ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Daily Stress, Coping, and Well-Being in Parents of Children with Autism: A Multilevel Modeling Approach

Pottie, Colin G., Ingram, Kathleen M.·2008·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

This study used a repeated daily measurement design to examine the direct and moderating effects of coping on daily psychological distress and well-being in parents of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Twice weekly over a 12-week period, 93 parents provided reports of their daily stress, coping responses, and end-of-day mood. Multilevel modeling analyses identified 5 coping responses (e.g., seeking support, positive reframing) that predicted increased daily positive mood and 4 (e.g., escape, withdrawal) that were associated with decreased positive mood. Similarly, 2 coping responses were associated with decreased daily negative mood and 5 predicted increased negative mood. The moderating effects of gender and the 11 coping responses were also examined. Gender did not moderate the daily coping?mood relationship, however 3 coping responses (emotional regulation, social support, and worrying) were found to moderate the daily stress?mood relationship. Additionally, ASD symptomatology, and time since an ASD diagnosis were not found to predict daily parental mood. This study is perhaps the first to identify coping responses that enhance daily well-being and mitigate daily distress in parents of children with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013604

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pottie, C. G., & Ingram, K. M.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2008-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
855-864
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2155737447
Cited by
253
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (752-2004-0434)
  • Organization for Autism Research
  • Society of the Psychological Study of Social Issues
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Graduate School
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parents of autistic children, daily stress, coping responses, parental well-being, parental mood, positive and negative mood, gender differences, emotion regulation, social support, worry, support seeking, positive reframing, time since diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Personality Inventory, Stress, Psychological, Cost of Illness, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review