Cited by 1,341Ethics in Business and EducationLeadership and Management in OrganizationsCorporate Identity and Reputation

Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for Ethical Leadership

Treviño, Linda Klebe, Hartman, Laura Pincus, Brown, Michael·2000·California Management Review

Abstract

Executives should not take a reputation for ethical leadership for granted. Based on interviews with senior executives and corporate ethics officers, this article reveals that a reputation for executive ethical leadership rests on two essential pillars: the executive's visibility as a moral person (based upon perceived traits, behaviors, and decision-making processes) and visibility as a moral manager (based upon role modeling, use of the reward system, and communication). Developing a reputation for ethical leadership pays dividends in reduced legal problems and increased employee commitment, satisfaction, and employee ethical conduct. The alternatives are the unethical leader, the hypocritical leader (who talks the talk, but doesn't walk the walk), and the ethically neutral leader (who may be an ethical person, but employees don't know it because the leader has not made ethics and values an explicit part of the leadership agenda). The article also offers guidelines for cultivating a reputation for ethical leadership.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/41166057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike the other approaches to moral leadership, ethical leaders use transactional discipline to reinforce norm-based expectations.

    “Unlike the other approaches to moral leadership, ethical leaders use transactional discipline to reinforce norm-based expectations (Brown et al., 2005;Treviño et al., 2000).”
  • The ethical leader seeks to make duties and norms a salient part of the day-to-day mindset of followers through active attempts to institutionalize those norms as part of team cultures.

    “The ethical leader seeks to make these duties and norms a salient part of the day-to-day mindset of followers (Treviño et al., 2000) through active attempts to institutionalize those norms as part of team cultures (Treviño et al., 2003).”
  • Concern for stakeholders and interest in the greater good were mentioned in the development of ethical leadership but were not included in the formal ethical leadership construct.

    “Some executives in Treviño et al's (2000) qualitative development of ethical leadership did mention concern for stakeholders (critical to servant leadership theory), and the authors themselves propose that ethical leaders should be interested in the greater good (Treviño et al., 2003), but these emphases were not included in the formal ethical leadership construct (Brown et al., 2005).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M.
Venue
California Management Review
Published
2000-07
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
128-142
ISSN
  • 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-8564
OpenAlex
W2071010852
Cited by
1,341
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 55
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
California Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
Keywords
ethical leadership, executive reputation, role modeling, reward systems, organizational communication, employee commitment, legal risk reduction, leadership development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review