The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Abstract
The 3 most often-used performance measures in the cognitive and decision sciences are choice, response or decision time, and confidence. We develop a random walk/diffusion theory-2-stage dynamic signal detection (2DSD) theory-that accounts for all 3 measures using a common underlying process. The model uses a drift diffusion process to account for choice and decision time. To estimate confidence, we assume that evidence continues to accumulate after the choice. Judges then interrupt the process to categorize the accumulated evidence into a confidence rating. The model explains all known interrelationships between the 3 indices of performance. Furthermore, the model also accounts for the distributions of each variable in both a perceptual and general knowledge task. The dynamic nature of the model also reveals the moderating effects of time pressure on the accuracy of choice and confidence. Finally, the model specifies the optimal solution for giving the fastest choice and confidence rating for a given level of choice and confidence accuracy. Judges are found to act in a manner consistent with the optimal solution when making confidence judgments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pleskac & Busemeyer (2010) additionally proposed that this evidence accumulation process may continue after a decision has been made, informing estimates of decision confidence and potentially leading to changes of mind (Resulaj et al. 2009, van den Berg et al. 2016a).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010
In the citing paper
“In turn, constraints on postdecisional evidence accumulation may affect the extent to which confidence estimates faithfully track performance (Desender et al. 2022, Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010
In the citing paper
“This assumption is supported by the finding that longer latencies of CJ are related to lower confidence ratings (Kälin & Roebers, 2020;Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010).”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the field of perceptual decision-making has highlighted the fact that confidence can be measured independently of the choice process itself9,10, where it is conceptualized as reflecting a “second-order” metacognitive evaluation.”
From Confidence in value-based choice (2013) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Pleskac and collaborators have shown that a single process can explain confidence in choices made in perceptual (line discrimination and random dot motion) and cognitive (city size inference) tasks (Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010;Yu, Pleskac, & Zeigenfuse, 2015).”
From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
In the citing paper
“Moreover, they show that a model based on a single process to compute confidence in different domains can explain what factors control the degree of correlation between tasks.”
From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Anderson, N. H. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410600004-24 · Cited by 6,939
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 723
Preference accumulation as a process model of desirability ratings
Bhatia, S., & Pleskac, T. J. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.12.003 · Cited by 10
Self-citationStevens, C. A., & Carlson, R. A. (2019) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.132.3.0293 · Cited by 9
Revealing multisensory benefit with diffusion modeling
Murray, C. A., de Larrea-Mancera, E. S. L., Glicksohn, A., Shams, L. B., & Seitz, A. R. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102449 · Cited by 9
The similarity-updating model of probability judgment and belief revision.
Albrecht, R., Jenny, M. A., Nilsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000299 · Cited by 9
Context-Aware Streaming Perception in Dynamic Environments
Sela, G.-E., Gog, I., Wong, J., Agrawal, K. K., Mo, X., Kalra, S., Schafhalter, P., Leong, E., Wang, X., Balaji, B., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19839-7_36 · Cited by 9
Metric error monitoring as a component of metacognitive processing
Öztel, T., & Balcı, F. (2023) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.16182 · Cited by 9
Self-selection bias in hypothesis comparison
Whitman, J. C., & Woodward, T. S. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.02.002 · Cited by 9
Scoring Situational Judgment Tests Using Profile Similarity Metrics
Legree, P. J., Kilcullen, R. N., Psotka, J., Putka, D. J., & Ginter, R. N. (2010) · doi:10.21236/ada530091 · Cited by 9
A post-decisional neural marker of confidence predicts information-seeking in decision-makingPreprint
Desender, K., Murphy, P., Boldt, A., Verguts, T., & Yeung, N. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/433276 · Cited by 10
A unified theory of discrete and continuous respondingPreprint
Kvam, P. D., Marley, A. A. J., & Heathcote, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dkybt · Cited by 9
Double Responding: A New Constraint for Models of Speeded Decision MakingPreprint
Evans, N. J., Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nf2q9 · Cited by 10
Hands of confidence: When gestures increase confidence in spatial problem-solving
Çapan, D., Furman, R., Göksun, T., & Eskenazi, T. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231164270 · Cited by 9
Unconscious Perception of Vernier Offsets
Amerio, P., Michel, M., Goerttler, S., Peters, M. A. K., & Axel Cleeremans, B. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00145 · Cited by 10
Goueytes, D., Stockart, F., Robin, A., Gyger, L., Rouy, M., Hoffmann, D., Minotti, L., Kahane, P., Pereira, M., & Faivre, N. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61744-8 · Cited by 12
Metacognitive Domains Are Not Aligned along a Dimension of Internal-External Information Source
Arbuzova, P., Maurer, L. K., & Filevich, E. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02201-1 · Cited by 8
Computational Models of Decision Making
Johnson, J. G., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108755610.020 · Cited by 10
Self-citationConfidence response times: Challenging postdecisional models of confidence
Chen, S., & Rahnev, D. (2023) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.23.7.11 · Cited by 11
Beyond choice: investigating the sensitivity and validity of measures of strength of preference
Butler, D., Isoni, A., Loomes, G., & Tsutsui, K. (2013) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-013-9383-7 · Cited by 8
Metacognitive asymmetries in visual perception
Mazor, M., Moran, R., & Fleming, S. M. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab005 · Cited by 8
Bang, D., Mahmoodi, A., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G. E., Frith, C., & Bahrami, B. (2014) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_9
Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imagingPreprint
Pereira, M., Faivre, N., Iturrate, I., Wirthlin, M., Serafini, L., Martin, S. L., Desvachez, A., Blanke, O., Ville, D. V. D., & Millán, J. D. R. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/496877 · Cited by 8
Task-related motor response inflates confidencePreprint
Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B., & Koculak, M. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.26.010306 · Cited by 11
Neural Signatures of Evidence Accumulation Encode Subjective Perceptual ConfidencePreprint
Dou, W., Arango, L. J. M., Castaneda, O. G., Arellano, L., Mcintyre, E., Yballa, C., & Samaha, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.28.538782 · Cited by 8
Open System Model of Choice and Response TimePreprint
Epping, G. P., Kvam, P. D., Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2022) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100453 · Cited by 8
Self-citationWhy advertisers should embrace event typicality and maximize leveraging of major events
Carrillat, F. A., Mazodier, M., & Eckert, C. (2024) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-024-01012-1 · Cited by 7
Scaltritti, M., Giacomoni, F., Job, R., & Sulpizio, S. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0001113 · Cited by 7
Stone, C., Mattingley, J. B., Bode, S., & Rangelov, D. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae179 · Cited by 10
A low-dimensional approximation of optimal confidence
Denmat, P. L., Verguts, T., & Desender, K. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012273 · Cited by 7
Adult age differences in the integration of values for self and other
Pollerhoff, L., Saulin, A., Kurtz, M., Stietz, J., Peng, X.-R., Hein, G., Tusche, A., Kanske, P., Li, S., & Reiter, A. M. F. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-96656-6 · Cited by 8
Single-Neuron Correlates of Decision Confidence in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe
Unruh-Pinheiro, A., Hill, M. R., Weber, B., Boström, J. P., Elger, C. E., & Mormann, F. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.021 · Cited by 8
Self-motion perception and sequential decision-making: where are we heading?
Jerjian, S. J., Harsch, D. R., & Fetsch, C. R. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0333 · Cited by 6
Dynamics of visibility, confidence, and choice during eye movements.
Navajas, J., Sigman, M., & Kamienkowski, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0036321 · Cited by 7
Hsu, Y., & Doble, C. W. (2014) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12040 · Cited by 8
Epistemic feelings, metacognition, and the Lima problem
Greely, N. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03094-8 · Cited by 7
Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
Stephens, R., Dunn, J. C., & Hayes, B. K. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000587 · Cited by 7
Evidence accumulation determines conscious accessPreprint
Pereira, M., Mégevand, P., Tan, M. X., Chang, W., Wang, S., Rezai, A. R., Seeck, M., Corniola, M. V., Momjian, S., Bernasconi, F., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.10.196659 · Cited by 8
Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in dynamic stimuli tasksPreprint
Calder-Travis, J. M., Bogacz, R., & Yeung, N. (2020) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/tk3vp · Cited by 8
Sánchez-Fuenzalida, N., van Gaal, S., Fleming, S. M., Haaf, J. M., & Fahrenfort, J. J. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xa4fj · Cited by 9
Cortical evidence accumulation for perceptual experience occurs irrespective of reportsPreprint
Stockart, F., Msheik, R., Robin, A., Jurkovičová, L., Goueytes, D., Rouy, M., Mareček, R., Hoffmann, D., Mudrik, L., Román, R., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.20.585198 · Cited by 7
Nozari, N. (2025) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2025.101247 · Cited by 7
When Virtual Meets Authenticity: How Virtual Streamers Shape Consumer Decision‐Making Confidence
Xie, Y., Gao, L., Cui, F., & Zhang, W. (2025) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70152 · Cited by 6
The presence of irrelevant alternatives paradoxically increases confidence in perceptual decisions
Comay, N. A., Bella, G. A. D., Lamberti, P. W., Sigman, M., Solovey, G., & Barttfeld, P. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105377 · Cited by 8
Accounting for endogenous effects in decision-making with a non-linear diffusion decision model
Hoxha, I., Chevallier, S., Ciarchi, M., Glasauer, S., Arnaud Delorme, A., & Amorim, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32841-9 · Cited by 6
How Sure is the Driver? Modelling Drivers’ Confidence in Left-Turn Gap Acceptance Decisions
Bontje, F., & Zgonnikov, A. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-024-00207-7 · Cited by 9
Gavenas, J., Schurger, A., & Maoz, U. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00465 · Cited by 4
Studying Metacognitive Processes at the Single Neuron Level
Middlebrooks, P. G., Abzug, Z. M., & Sommer, M. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_10 · Cited by 6
Simulating human decision making for testing soft and hard/soft fusion algorithms
Bucci, D. J., Acharya, S., & Kam, M. (2013) · Conference on Information Sciences and Systems · doi:10.1109/ciss.2013.6552278 · Cited by 6
Two-Year-Olds’ Eye Movements Reflect Confidence in Their Understanding of Words
Dautriche, I., Goupil, L., Smith, K., & Rabagliati, H. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221105208 · Cited by 6
Evaluating false positive rates of standard and hierarchical measures of metacognitive accuracy
Rausch, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2023) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-023-09353-y · Cited by 9
A confidence framing effect: Flexible use of evidence in metacognitive monitoring
Sakamoto, Y., & Miyoshi, K. (2024) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103636 · Cited by 7
Kvam, P. D. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02587-0 · Cited by 6
Subjective confidence and source reliability in soft data fusion
Bucci, D. J., Acharya, S., Pleskac, T. J., & Kam, M. (2014) · Conference on Information Sciences and Systems · doi:10.1109/ciss.2014.6814173 · Cited by 6
Self-citationRetrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection
Papesh, M. H., Hicks, J. L., & Pinto, J. D. G. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819836753 · Cited by 6
Berlemont, K., Martin, J., Sackur, J., & Nadal, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63582-8 · Cited by 7
Prosody facilitates learning the word order in a new language
Saksida, A., Fló, A., Guedes, B., Nespor, M., & Garay, M. P. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104686 · Cited by 6
Dummel, S., & Rummel, J. (2015) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1117642 · Cited by 6
Metacognition and Confidence in Value-Based Choice
Fleming, S. M., & Martino, B. D. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_8 · Cited by 6
Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Solovey, G., Kühn, S., & Blanke, O. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/095950 · Cited by 7
Value Certainty in Drift-Diffusion Models of Preferential ChoicePreprint
Lee, D. G., & Usher, M. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.22.262725 · Cited by 5
The timing of confidence computations in human prefrontal cortexPreprint
Xue, K., Zheng, Y., Rafiei, F., & Rahnev, D. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.21.533662 · Cited by 7
COMPONENT NUMERACY SKILLS AND DECISION MAKING
Ghazal, S. (2014) · Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/964 · Cited by 7
Sánchez-Fuenzalida, N., van Gaal, S., Fleming, S. M., Haaf, J. M., & Fahrenfort, J. J. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00257-y · Cited by 6
“Sentio ergo est”: Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception
Tsikandilakis, M., Bali, P., Karlis, A., Morfi, P., Mével, P.-A., Madan, C. R., & Milbank, A. G. (2024) · Perception · doi:10.1177/03010066241302996 · Cited by 6
Prior memory responses modulate behavior and brain state engagement
Wheelock, J. R., & Long, N. M. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00165-7 · Cited by 5
Metacognitive confidence and affect – two sides of the same coin?
Voodla, A., Uusberg, A., & Desender, K. (2025) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2025.2451795 · Cited by 5
Pournaghdali, A., Schwartz, B. L., & Soto, F. A. (2025) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.442 · Cited by 5
Guo, M., Ikink, I., Roelofs, K., & Figner, B. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02709-2 · Cited by 6
Cloude, E. B., Kumar, P., Baker, R. S., & Fouh, E. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636848 · Cited by 5
Action-based confidence sharing and collective decision making
Coucke, N., Heinrich, M. K., Dorigo, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111006 · Cited by 5
On the limitations of fixed‐step‐size adaptive methods with response confidence
Hsu, Y., & Chin, C.-L. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12018 · Cited by 5
The Encoding of Decision Difficulty and Movement Time in the Primate Premotor Cortex
Martínez-Garcia, M., Insabato, A., Pannunzi, M., Pardo‐Vázquez, J. L., Acuña, C., & Deco, G. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004502 · Cited by 5
Are you sure the library is that way? Metacognitive monitoring of spatial judgments.
Stevens, C. A., & Carlson, R. A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000229 · Cited by 5
Multiple Choice Neurodynamical Model of the Uncertain Option Task
Insabato, A., Pannunzi, M., & Deco, G. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005250 · Cited by 5
Beyond Dichotomy: Dynamics of Choice in Compositional Space
Jensen, G. (2014) · doi:10.7916/d8nc5zc4 · Cited by 5
Kang, I., Molenaar, D., & Ratcliff, R. (2023) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-023-09902-z · Cited by 6
Probabilistic causal reasoning under time pressure
Kolvoort, I. R., Fisher, E. L., van Rooij, R., Schulz, K., & van Maanen, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297011 · Cited by 7
A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 2. Confidence analysis
Yi, Y., Wang, W., & Merfeld, D. M. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00400.2016 · Cited by 5
The distorting effects of deciding to stop sampling informationPreprint
Coenen, A., & Gureckis, T. M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tbrea · Cited by 5
Avoiding costly mistakes in groups: The evolution of error management in collective decision makingPreprint
Tump, A. N., Wolf, M., Romańczuk, P., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r4kd7 · Cited by 5
Overcoming indecision by changing the decision boundaryPreprint
Malhotra, G., Leslie, D., Ludwig, C. J. H., & Bogacz, R. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2rdrw · Cited by 5
How the “Wisdom of the Inner Crowd” Can Boost Accuracy of Confidence JudgmentsPreprint
Litvinova, A., Herzog, S. M., Kall, A. A., Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ngweh · Cited by 5
Self-citationCommon computations for metacognition and meta-metacognitionPreprint
Zheng, Y., Recht, S., & Rahnev, D. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g4h65 · Cited by 5
Kopčanová, M., Ince, R. A. A., & Benwell, C. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.21.537831 · Cited by 6
Miyoshi, K., Webb, T. W., Rahnev, D., & Lau, H. C. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820480-1.00049-8 · Cited by 10
How disconfirmatory evidence shapes confidence in decision-making
Boldt, A., Sun, Y., & Desender, K. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00325-3 · Cited by 5
Ding, S. Z., Pan, X., Hu, L., & Qu, Q. (2026) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2026.103932 · Cited by 4
Affective valence does not reflect progress prediction errors in perceptual decisions
Voodla, A., Uusberg, A., & Desender, K. (2024) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-023-01147-8 · Cited by 3
Gender and anxiety reveal distinct computational sources of underconfidence
Katyal, S., & Fleming, S. M. (2026) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291725102808 · Cited by 5
RT-MPTs: Process models for response-time distributions with diffusion-model kernels
Klauer, K. C., Hartmann, R., & Meyer-Grant, C. G. (2024) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2024.102857 · Cited by 5
Frazer, R., & Grizzard, M. (2024) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtae007 · Cited by 4
Behavioral and neural measures of confidence using a novel auditory pitch identification task
Tang, T., Samaha, J., & Peters, M. A. K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299784 · Cited by 4
Asadpour, A., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2025) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00441 · Cited by 4
Priors for natural image statistics inform confidence in perceptual decisions
West, R. K., A-Izzeddin, E. J., Sewell, D. K., & Harrison, W. J. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103818 · Cited by 4
The dynamics of decision making when probabilities are vaguely specified
Pothos, E. M., Shiffrin, R. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.09.001 · Cited by 4
Self-citationDissociation between the impact of evidence on eye movement target choice and confidence judgements
McSorley, E., Lyne, C., & McCloy, R. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3884-2 · Cited by 5
Performance Of Probability Transformations Using Simulated Human Opinions
Bucci, D. J., Acharya, S., Pleskac, T. J., & Kam, M. (2015) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.22870 · Cited by 4
Self-citationModeling Responses and Response Times in Rating Scales With the Linear Ballistic Accumulator
Ranger, J., & Kuhn, J. (2018) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000152 · Cited by 4
Chen, B., Mundy, M. E., & Tsuchiya, N. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01712 · Cited by 6
The Role of Subjective Experiences in Conflict Tasks: A Review
Questienne, L., van Dijck, J., & Gevers, W. (2021) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.508 · Cited by 4
Santángelo, A. P., Ludwig, C. J. H., Navajas, J., Sigman, M., & Leone, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001189 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 864-901
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2158389550
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2011-01-17)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH019879)
- National Science Foundation (0817965)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- drift-diffusion model, confidence judgments, decision time, choice, random walks, evidence accumulation, time pressure, perceptual decision making, knowledge-based decision making, optimal decision strategies
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Signal Detection, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
