The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Abstract
The 3 most often-used performance measures in the cognitive and decision sciences are choice, response or decision time, and confidence. We develop a random walk/diffusion theory-2-stage dynamic signal detection (2DSD) theory-that accounts for all 3 measures using a common underlying process. The model uses a drift diffusion process to account for choice and decision time. To estimate confidence, we assume that evidence continues to accumulate after the choice. Judges then interrupt the process to categorize the accumulated evidence into a confidence rating. The model explains all known interrelationships between the 3 indices of performance. Furthermore, the model also accounts for the distributions of each variable in both a perceptual and general knowledge task. The dynamic nature of the model also reveals the moderating effects of time pressure on the accuracy of choice and confidence. Finally, the model specifies the optimal solution for giving the fastest choice and confidence rating for a given level of choice and confidence accuracy. Judges are found to act in a manner consistent with the optimal solution when making confidence judgments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pleskac & Busemeyer (2010) additionally proposed that this evidence accumulation process may continue after a decision has been made, informing estimates of decision confidence and potentially leading to changes of mind (Resulaj et al. 2009, van den Berg et al. 2016a).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010
In the citing paper
“In turn, constraints on postdecisional evidence accumulation may affect the extent to which confidence estimates faithfully track performance (Desender et al. 2022, Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010
In the citing paper
“This assumption is supported by the finding that longer latencies of CJ are related to lower confidence ratings (Kälin & Roebers, 2020;Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010).”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the field of perceptual decision-making has highlighted the fact that confidence can be measured independently of the choice process itself9,10, where it is conceptualized as reflecting a “second-order” metacognitive evaluation.”
From Confidence in value-based choice (2013) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Pleskac and collaborators have shown that a single process can explain confidence in choices made in perceptual (line discrimination and random dot motion) and cognitive (city size inference) tasks (Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010;Yu, Pleskac, & Zeigenfuse, 2015).”
From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
In the citing paper
“Moreover, they show that a model based on a single process to compute confidence in different domains can explain what factors control the degree of correlation between tasks.”
From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Anderson, N. H. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410600004-24 · Cited by 6,939
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 723
Response latencies and eye gaze provide insight on how toddlers gather evidence under uncertainty
Leckey, S., Selmeczy, D., Kazemi, A., Johnson, E. G., Hembacher, E., & Ghetti, S. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0913-y · Cited by 36
Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
Grogan, J. P., Rys, W., Kelly, S. P., & O’Connell, R. G. (2023) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00005 · Cited by 40
Towards a common conceptual space for metacognition in perception and memory
Mazancieux, A., Pereira, M., Faivre, N., Mamassian, P., Moulin, C. J. A., & Souchay, C. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00245-1 · Cited by 44
Cesario, J., & Jonas, K. J. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.124 · Cited by 35
Verdonck, S., Loossens, T., & Philiastides, M. G. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000258 · Cited by 38
Computational and Process Models of Decision Making in Psychology and Behavioral Economics
Johnson, E. J., & Ratcliff, R. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00003-6 · Cited by 40
Manipulating Prior Beliefs Causally Induces Under- and Overconfidence
Marcke, H. V., Denmat, P. L., Verguts, T., & Desender, K. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976241231572 · Cited by 44
Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition
Hilbig, B. E., & Glöckner, A. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.005 · Cited by 34
On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: The case of recognition memory.
Kellen, D., Klauer, K. C., & Singmann, H. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0027727 · Cited by 35
Changes-of-mind in the absence of new post-decision evidence
Atiya, N. A. A., Zgonnikov, A., Schoemann, M., Scherbaum, S., O’Hora, D. P., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007149 · Cited by 32
Confidence estimation as a stochastic process in a neurodynamical system of decision making
Wei, Z., & Wang, X. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00793.2014 · Cited by 32
An entropy model for artificial grammar learning
Pothos, E. M. (2010) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00016 · Cited by 34
Altering movement parameters disrupts metacognitive accuracy
Palser, E. R., Fotopoulou, A., & Kilner, J. M. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.11.005 · Cited by 33
Dissociable components of the reward circuit are involved in appraisal versus choice
Shenhav, A., & Karmarkar, U. R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38927-7 · Cited by 34
Metacognitive Effort Regulation across Cultures
Ackerman, R., Binah-Pollak, A., & Lauterman, T. (2023) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence11090171 · Cited by 34
Dynamic sources of evidence supporting confidence judgments and error detection.
Charles, L., & Yeung, N. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000583 · Cited by 38
Separable neural signatures of confidence during perceptual decisions
Balsdon, T., Mamassian, P., & Wyart, V. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.68491 · Cited by 44
Metacognitive improvement: Disentangling adaptive training from experimental confounds.
Rouy, M., de Gardelle, V., Gabriel Reyes, M., Sackur, J., Vergnaud, J., Filevich, E., & Faivre, N. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001185 · Cited by 33
A task-independent neural representation of subjective certainty in visual perception
Heereman, J., Walter, H., & Heekeren, H. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00551 · Cited by 36
Miyoshi, K., & Lau, H. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000184 · Cited by 33
Post-decision wagering after perceptual judgments reveals bi-directional certainty readouts
Moreira, C. M., Rollwage, M., Kaduk, K., Wilke, M., & Kagan, I. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.026 · Cited by 37
Drescher, L. H., den Bussche, E. V., & Desender, K. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191639 · Cited by 36
Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop204024 · Cited by 32
Self-citationThe folded X-pattern is not necessarily a statistical signature of decision confidence
Rausch, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007456 · Cited by 38
Value certainty in drift-diffusion models of preferential choice.
Lee, D. G., & Usher, M. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000329 · Cited by 31
Computational mate choice: Theory and empirical evidence
Castellano, S., Cadeddu, G., & Cermelli, P. (2012) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.010 · Cited by 31
Jiang, S., Wang, S., & Wan, X. (2022) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001301 · Cited by 30
Multi-stage sequential sampling models with finite or infinite time horizon and variable boundaries
Diederich, A., & Oswald, P. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.02.010 · Cited by 31
Osth, A. F., Shabahang, K. D., Mewhort, D. J. K., & Heathcote, A. (2019) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104071 · Cited by 31
Response-Related Signals Increase Confidence But Not Metacognitive Performance
Filevich, E., Koß, C., & Faivre, N. (2020) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0326-19.2020 · Cited by 29
Dual strategies in human confidence judgments
Bertana, A., Четвериков, А. А., van Bergen, R. S., Ling, S., & Jehee, J. F. M. (2021) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.21.5.21 · Cited by 27
Human VMPFC encodes early signatures of confidence in perceptual decisionsPreprint
Gherman, S., & Philiastides, M. G. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/224337 · Cited by 30
Kwok, S. C., Cai, Y., & Buckley, M. J. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0330-19.2019 · Cited by 28
Measuring metacognition of direct and indirect parameters of voluntary movement.
Arbuzova, P., Peters, C., Röd, L., Koß, C., Maurer, H., Maurer, L. K., Müller, H., Verrel, J., & Filevich, E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000892 · Cited by 28
Intrachoice Dynamics Shape Social Decisions
Chen, F., Zhu, Z., Shen, Q., Krajbich, I. M., & Hare, T. A. (2023) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.4732 · Cited by 28
Metacognition of visuomotor decisions in conversion disorder
Bègue, I., Blakemore, R. L., Klug, J., Cojan, Y., Galli, S., Berney, A., Aybek, S., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.018 · Cited by 32
Boundedly rational expected utility theory
Navarro‐Martinez, D., Loomes, G., Isoni, A., Butler, D., & Alaoui, L. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-018-9293-3 · Cited by 27
Metacognition and confidence: A review and synthesisPreprint
Fleming, S. M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ge7tz · Cited by 27
Kälin, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09306-x · Cited by 27
Judgment: a cognitive processing perspective
Pachur, T., & Bröder, A. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1259 · Cited by 25
Should metacognition be measured by logistic regression?
Rausch, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.007 · Cited by 26
Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
Siedlecka, M., Skóra, Z., Paulewicz, B., Fijałkowska, S., Timmermans, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000608 · Cited by 29
Modeling accuracy, response time, and bias in continuous orientation judgments.
Kvam, P. D. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000606 · Cited by 27
Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making
Evans, N. J., Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2020) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101292 · Cited by 28
Bègue, I., Vaessen, M. J., Hofmeister, J., Pereira, M., Schwartz, S., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy102 · Cited by 25
Markov versus quantum dynamic models of belief change during evidence monitoring
Busemeyer, J., Kvam, P. D., & Pleskac, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54383-9 · Cited by 21
Self-citationPerceptual decision confidence is sensitive to forgone physical effort expenditure
Turner, W., Angdias, R., Feuerriegel, D., Chong, T. T. ‐., Hester, R., & Bode, S. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104525 · Cited by 25
Metacognitive Confidence Can Increase but Also Decrease Performance in Academic Settings
Moreno, L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2021) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-021-09270-y · Cited by 26
Suprathreshold perceptual decisions constrain models of confidence
Locke, S. M., Landy, M. S., & Mamassian, P. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010318 · Cited by 25
Prior information differentially affects discrimination decisions and subjective confidence reports
Constant, M., Pereira, M., Faivre, N., & Filevich, E. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41112-0 · Cited by 27
Modeling the adaptation of search termination in human decision making.
Lee, M. D., Newell, B. R., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2014) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000019 · Cited by 25
Multimodal learning with audio description
Krejtz, K., Krejtz, I., Duchowski, A. T., Szarkowska, A., & Walczak, A. (2012) · ACM Symposium on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/2338676.2338694 · Cited by 25
Confidence in Dyadic Decision Making: The Role of Individual Differences
Schuldt, J. P., Chabris, C. F., Woolley, A. W., & Hackman, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1927 · Cited by 25
The Influence of Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention on Decision Confidence
Kurtz, P., Shapcott, K. A., Kaiser, J., Schmiedt, J. T., & Schmid, M. C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06715-w · Cited by 24
Parsing the neural signatures of reduced error detection in older age
Harty, S., Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., & O’Connell, R. G. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.032 · Cited by 26
Categorical evidence, confidence, and urgency during probabilistic categorization
Braunlich, K., & Seger, C. A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.011 · Cited by 24
Certainty in numerical judgments develops independently of the approximate number system
Baer, C., & Odic, D. (2019) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100817 · Cited by 26
Kim, J., Kwon, J. H., Kim, E. J., Kim, E. J., Kim, H. E., Kyeong, S.-H., & Kim, J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94328-9 · Cited by 41
Towards characterizing the canonical computations generating phenomenal experience
Peters, M. A. K. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104903 · Cited by 25
Introspection during visual search
Gabriel Reyes, M., & Sackur, J. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.009 · Cited by 24
A Generative View of Rationality and Growing Awareness†
Felin, T., & Koenderink, J. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807261 · Cited by 24
The positive evidence bias in perceptual confidence is unlikely post-decisional
Samaha, J., & Denison, R. N. (2022) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niac010 · Cited by 32
The online metacognitive control of decisions
Bénon, J., Lee, D. G., Hopper, W., Verdeil, M., Pessiglione, M., Vinckier, F., Bouret, S., Rouault, M., Bouc, R. L., Pezzulo, G., et al. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00071-y · Cited by 34
Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion. Collected Works, Volume 5
Smarandache, F., Dezert, J., & Tchamova, A. (2009) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · Cited by 23
Proctor, R. W., Nof, S. Y., Yih, Y., Balasubramanian, P. R., Busemeyer, J. R., Carayon, P., Chiu, C., Farahmand, F., González, C., Gore, J. P., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.537175 · Cited by 24
Self-citationItem response models of probability judgments: Application to a geopolitical forecasting tournament.
Merkle, E. C., Steyvers, M., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000032 · Cited by 23
Fechner, H. B., Pachur, T., Schooler, L. J., Mehlhorn, K., Battal, C., Volz, K. G., & Borst, J. P. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.011 · Cited by 23
Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm
Konishi, M., Compain, C., Berberian, B., Sackur, J., & de Gardelle, V. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01779-8 · Cited by 27
Confidence in visual motion discrimination is preserved in individuals with schizophrenia
Faivre, N., Roger, M., Pereira, M., de Gardelle, V., Vergnaud, J., Passerieux, C., & Roux, P. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.200022 · Cited by 28
Hierarchical models of simple mechanisms underlying confidence in decision making
Merkle, E. C., Smithson, M. J., & Verkuilen, J. (2010) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.011 · Cited by 23
Trueblood, J. S., Brown, S. D., Heathcote, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e519682015-026 · Cited by 23
Self-citationOptimal metacognitive decision strategies in signal detection theory
Maniscalco, B., Charles, L., & Peters, M. A. K. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02510-7 · Cited by 25
Confidence through consensus: a neural mechanism for uncertainty monitoring
Paz, L., Insabato, A., Zylberberg, A., Deco, G., & Sigman, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21830 · Cited by 26
A quantum information architecture for cue-based heuristics.
Kvam, P. D., & Pleskac, T. J. (2016) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000070 · Cited by 23
Self-citationSubjective confidence acts as an internal cost-benefit factor when choosing between tasks.
Carlebach, N., & Yeung, N. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000747 · Cited by 25
Esser, S., Lustig, C., & Haider, H. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01594-3 · Cited by 27
Zhu, J.-Q., Sundh, J., Spicer, J., Chater, N., & Sanborn, A. N. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000427 · Cited by 31
The timing of confidence computations in human prefrontal cortex
Xue, K., Zheng, Y., Rafiei, F., & Rahnev, D. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.009 · Cited by 28
How to tell a wife from a hat: Affective feedback in perceptual categorization
Четвериков, А. А., & Filippova, M. (2014) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.012 · Cited by 25
Neural Correlates of Perceived Confidence in a Partial Report Paradigm
Graziano, M., Parra, L. C., & Sigman, M. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00759 · Cited by 23
Goal- and retrieval-dependent activity in the striatum during memory recognition
Clos, M., Schwarze, U., Gluth, S., Bunzeck, N., & Sommer, T. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.011 · Cited by 21
Gluth, S., & Meiran, N. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.42607 · Cited by 21
Metric error monitoring: Another generalized mechanism for magnitude representations?
Yallak, E., & Balcı, F. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104532 · Cited by 25
Modelling visibility judgments using models of decision confidence
Rausch, M., Hellmann, S., & Zehetleitner, M. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02284-3 · Cited by 21
Feuerriegel, D., Murphy, M., Konski, A., Mepani, V., Sun, J., Hester, R., & Bode, S. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119447 · Cited by 24
Ackerman, R., Yom‐Tov, E., & Torgovitsky, I. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104248 · Cited by 22
Lei, W. I., Chen, J., Yang, C., Guo, Y., Feng, P., Feng, T., & Li, H. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107502 · Cited by 24
Delay, C., & Wixted, J. T. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01831-7 · Cited by 21
Enachescu, V., Schrater, P., Schaal, S., & Christopoulos, V. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009429 · Cited by 21
Stage 2 Registered Report: Metacognitive asymmetries in visual perception
Mazor, M., Moran, R., & Fleming, S. M. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab025 · Cited by 21
Partitioning the sources of recognition confidence: The role of individual differences
Kantner, J., & Dobbins, I. G. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01586-w · Cited by 21
Narrative Retribution and Cognitive Processing
Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K. S., Francemone, C. J., Ahn, C., Huang, J., Walton, J., McAllister, C., & Lewis, R. J. (2019) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219886512 · Cited by 24
Establishing the laws of preferential choice behavior
Bhatia, S., Loomes, G., & Read, D. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008457 · Cited by 20
Confidence at the limits of human nested cognition
Recht, S., Jovanović, L., Mamassian, P., & Balsdon, T. (2022) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niac014 · Cited by 20
Measures of metacognitive efficiency across cognitive models of decision confidence.
Rausch, M., Hellmann, S., & Zehetleitner, M. (2023) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000634 · Cited by 20
The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior
Riemer, M., Kubik, V., & Wolbers, T. (2019) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929 · Cited by 23
Metric error monitoring in the numerical estimates
Duyan, Y. A., & Balcı, F. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.011 · Cited by 22
Confidence control for efficient behaviour in dynamic environments
Balsdon, T., & Philiastides, M. G. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53312-3 · Cited by 25
Motor response influences perceptual awareness judgements
Siedlecka, M., Hobot, J., Skóra, Z., Paulewicz, B., Timmermans, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102804 · Cited by 21
Avoiding costly mistakes in groups: The evolution of error management in collective decision making
Tump, A., Wolf, M., Romanczuk, P., & Kurvers, R. (2021) · PLoS Comput. Biol. · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010442 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 864-901
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2158389550
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2011-01-17)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH019879)
- National Science Foundation (0817965)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- drift-diffusion model, confidence judgments, decision time, choice, random walks, evidence accumulation, time pressure, perceptual decision making, knowledge-based decision making, optimal decision strategies
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Signal Detection, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review