The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Abstract
The 3 most often-used performance measures in the cognitive and decision sciences are choice, response or decision time, and confidence. We develop a random walk/diffusion theory-2-stage dynamic signal detection (2DSD) theory-that accounts for all 3 measures using a common underlying process. The model uses a drift diffusion process to account for choice and decision time. To estimate confidence, we assume that evidence continues to accumulate after the choice. Judges then interrupt the process to categorize the accumulated evidence into a confidence rating. The model explains all known interrelationships between the 3 indices of performance. Furthermore, the model also accounts for the distributions of each variable in both a perceptual and general knowledge task. The dynamic nature of the model also reveals the moderating effects of time pressure on the accuracy of choice and confidence. Finally, the model specifies the optimal solution for giving the fastest choice and confidence rating for a given level of choice and confidence accuracy. Judges are found to act in a manner consistent with the optimal solution when making confidence judgments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pleskac & Busemeyer (2010) additionally proposed that this evidence accumulation process may continue after a decision has been made, informing estimates of decision confidence and potentially leading to changes of mind (Resulaj et al. 2009, van den Berg et al. 2016a).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010
In the citing paper
“In turn, constraints on postdecisional evidence accumulation may affect the extent to which confidence estimates faithfully track performance (Desender et al. 2022, Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010).”
From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer 2010
In the citing paper
“This assumption is supported by the finding that longer latencies of CJ are related to lower confidence ratings (Kälin & Roebers, 2020;Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010).”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the field of perceptual decision-making has highlighted the fact that confidence can be measured independently of the choice process itself9,10, where it is conceptualized as reflecting a “second-order” metacognitive evaluation.”
From Confidence in value-based choice (2013) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Pleskac and collaborators have shown that a single process can explain confidence in choices made in perceptual (line discrimination and random dot motion) and cognitive (city size inference) tasks (Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010;Yu, Pleskac, & Zeigenfuse, 2015).”
From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
In the citing paper
“Moreover, they show that a model based on a single process to compute confidence in different domains can explain what factors control the degree of correlation between tasks.”
From Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments (2016) · cites this paper as Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Anderson, N. H. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410600004-24 · Cited by 6,939
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009 · Cited by 869
Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.021 · Cited by 883
The neural basis of metacognitive ability
Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0417 · Cited by 747
“Recent models have been couched in an ‘evidence accumulation’ framework, in which samples of data are accumulated over time in order to model the temporal evolution of a decision [18, 72, 73].”
MethodMetacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 · Cited by 667
Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions
Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645 · Cited by 665
Self-Evaluation of Decision-Making: A General Bayesian Framework for Metacognitive Computation
Fleming, S. M., & Daw, N. D. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000045 · Cited by 584
Confidence in value-based choice
De Martino, B., Fleming, S. M., Garrett, N., & Dolan, R. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3279 · Cited by 534
Confidence and certainty: Distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals
Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J., & Kepecs, A. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4240 · Cited by 528
Choice Certainty Is Informed by Both Evidence and Decision Time
Kiani, R., Corthell, L., & Shadlen, M. N. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.015 · Cited by 470
Confidence as Bayesian probability: From neural origins to behavior
Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., & Mainen, Z. F. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.039 · Cited by 349
Prefrontal Contributions to Metacognition in Perceptual Decision Making
Fleming, S. M., Huijgen, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6489-11.2012 · Cited by 391
Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition
Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006 · Cited by 368
Suboptimality in perceptual decision making
Rahnev, D., & Denison, R. N. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18000936 · Cited by 342
A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory
Reyna, V. F. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002291 · Cited by 333
Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making
Crockett, M. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., Siegel, J. Z., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1408988111 · Cited by 326
Regenwetter, M., Dana, J. D., & Davis‐Stober, C. P. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0021150 · Cited by 316
The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision
Zylberberg, A., Barttfeld, P., & Sigman, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00079 · Cited by 297
The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.
Trueblood, J. S., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0036137 · Cited by 273
A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence
van den Berg, R., Anandalingam, K., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12192 · Cited by 270
Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal
Lebreton, M., Abitbol, R., Daunizeau, J., & Pessiglione, M. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4064 · Cited by 265
Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis
Fleming, S. M. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425 · Cited by 256
“Pleskac & Busemeyer (2010) additionally proposed that this evidence accumulation process may continue after a decision has been made, to inform estimates of decision confidence and potentially leading to changes of mind (van den Berg et al., 2016a, Resulaj et al., 2009).”
Signatures of a Statistical Computation in the Human Sense of Confidence
Sanders, J. I., Hangya, B., & Kepecs, A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.025 · Cited by 253
Perceptual confidence neglects decision-incongruent evidence in the brain
Peters, M. A. K., Thesen, T., Ko, Y., Maniscalco, B., Carlson, C., Davidson, M., Doyle, W., Kuzniecky, R., Devinsky, O., Halgren, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0139 · Cited by 265
Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection
Charles, L., Van Opstal, F., Marti, S., & Dehaene, S. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.054 · Cited by 208
Brain mechanisms for perceptual and reward-related decision-making
Deco, G., Rolls, E. T., Albantakis, L., & Romo, R. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.010 · Cited by 196
Confidence drives a neural confirmation bias
Rollwage, M., Loosen, A. M., Hauser, T. U., Moran, R., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16278-6 · Cited by 213
Hierarchical reasoning by neural circuits in the frontal cortex
Sarafyazd, M., & Jazayeri, M. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav8911 · Cited by 191
Moran, R., Teodorescu, A. R., & Usher, M. (2015) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.002 · Cited by 201
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking
Neys, W. D. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x2200142x · Cited by 214
Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence
Allen, M., Frank, D., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Fardo, F., Winston, J. S., Hauser, T. U., & Rees, G. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18103 · Cited by 182
Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
Ais, J., Zylberberg, A., Barttfeld, P., & Sigman, M. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.006 · Cited by 174
Human Metacognition Across Domains: Insights from Individual Differences and Neuroimaging
Rouault, M., McWilliams, A., Allen, M. G., & Fleming, S. M. (2018) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2018.16 · Cited by 176
The radical plasticity thesis: How the brain learns to be conscious.
Cleeremans, A. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00086 · Cited by 170
Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Harty, S., & O'Connell, R. G. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.11946 · Cited by 170
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition
Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & García‐Retamero, R. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004952 · Cited by 173
Action-Specific Disruption of Perceptual Confidence
Fleming, S. M., Maniscalco, B., Ko, Y., Amendi, N., Ro, T., & Lau, H. C. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614557697 · Cited by 169
Summerfield, C., & Tsetsos, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00070 · Cited by 167
Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0033152 · Cited by 173
The Relationship between Perceptual Decision Variables and Confidence in the Human Brain
Hebart, M. N., Schriever, Y., Donner, T. H., & Haynes, J. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu181 · Cited by 156
Direct injection of noise to the visual cortex decreases accuracy but increases decision confidence
Rahnev, D. A., Maniscalco, B., Luber, B., Lau, H., & Lisanby, S. H. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00985.2011 · Cited by 156
Neural mediators of changes of mind about perceptual decisions
Fleming, S. M., van der Putten, E. J., & Daw, N. D. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0104-6 · Cited by 155
The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.
Ackerman, R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0035098 · Cited by 152
Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports
Adler, W. T., & Ma, W. J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006572 · Cited by 118
Rahnev, D., Desender, K., Lee, A. L. F., Adler, W. T., Aguilar-Lleyda, D., Akdoğan, B., Arbuzova, P., Atlas, L. Y., Balcı, F., Bang, J. W., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0813-1 · Cited by 151
Gherman, S., & Philiastides, M. G. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.036 · Cited by 149
A generalized, likelihood-free method for posterior estimation
Turner, B. M., & Sederberg, P. B. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0530-0 · Cited by 151
Mamassian, P. (2016) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630 · Cited by 154
Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation
Balsdon, T., Wyart, V., & Mamassian, P. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15561-w · Cited by 137
Zylberberg, A., Fetsch, C. R., & Shadlen, M. N. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.17688 · Cited by 152
The signal processing architecture underlying subjective reports of sensory awareness
Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2016) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niw002 · Cited by 133
Does Confidence Use a Common Currency Across Two Visual Tasks?
de Gardelle, V., & Mamassian, P. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614528956 · Cited by 131
Doubly Bayesian Analysis of Confidence in Perceptual Decision-Making
Aitchison, L., Bang, D., Bahrami, B., & Latham, P. E. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004519 · Cited by 131
Behavioral, Modeling, and Electrophysiological Evidence for Supramodality in Human Metacognition
Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Solovey, G., Kühn, S., & Blanke, O. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0322-17.2017 · Cited by 129
Maniscalco, B., Peters, M. A. K., & Lau, H. (2016) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1059-x · Cited by 129
The development of adaptive conformity in young children: effects of uncertainty and consensus
Morgan, T. J. H., Laland, K. N., & Harris, P. L. (2014) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12231 · Cited by 138
Grimaldi, P., Lau, H. C., & Basso, M. A. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.006 · Cited by 138
Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions
van den Berg, R., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.021 · Cited by 125
The neural system of metacognition accompanying decision-making in the prefrontal cortex
Qiu, L., Su, J., Ni, Y., Bai, Y., Zhang, X., Li, X., & Wan, X. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004037 · Cited by 125
Tuning alpha rhythms to shape conscious visual perception
Gregorio, F. D., Trajkovic, J., Roperti, C., Marcantoni, E., Luzio, P. D., Avenanti, A., Thut, G., & Romei, V. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.003 · Cited by 125
Hysteresis affects approximate number discrimination in young children.
Odic, D., Hock, H. S., & Halberda, J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0030825 · Cited by 121
Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency
Shekhar, M., & Rahnev, D. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.007 · Cited by 129
Confidence modulates exploration and exploitation in value-based learning
Boldt, A., Blundell, C., & Martino, B. D. (2019) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niz004 · Cited by 120
The idiosyncratic nature of confidence
Navajas, J., Hindocha, C., Foda, H., Keramati, M., Latham, P. E., & Bahrami, B. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0215-1 · Cited by 135
Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants
Goupil, L., & Kouider, S. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.004 · Cited by 116
Interference effects of choice on confidence: Quantum characteristics of evidence accumulation
Kvam, P. D., Pleskac, T. J., Yu, S., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1500688112 · Cited by 115
Self-citationStarns, J. J., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.002 · Cited by 116
What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition
Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Bang, D., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., & Frith, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0420 · Cited by 118
A Mathematical Framework for Statistical Decision Confidence
Hangya, B., Sanders, J. I., & Kepecs, Á. (2016) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00864 · Cited by 107
Evidence Accumulation Models: Current Limitations and Future Directions
Evans, N. J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p073 · Cited by 127
Why neuroscience does not disprove free will.
Brass, M., Furstenberg, A., & Mele, A. (2019) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.024 · Cited by 56
The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.
Shekhar, M., & Rahnev, D. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000249 · Cited by 124
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.
Boldt, A., de Gardelle, V., & Yeung, N. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000404 · Cited by 110
Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00218 · Cited by 109
Models, movements, and minds: bridging the gap between decision making and action
Wispinski, N. J., Gallivan, J. P., & Chapman, C. S. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13973 · Cited by 112
Human VMPFC encodes early signatures of confidence in perceptual decisions
Gherman, S., & Philiastides, M. G. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.38293 · Cited by 107
Bang, D., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Lau, J. Y. F., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G. E., Frith, C., & Bahrami, B. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.002 · Cited by 108
Purcell, B. A., & Kiani, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524685113 · Cited by 106
Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading
Boldt, A., & Gilbert, S. J. (2019) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-019-0195-y · Cited by 105
Fleming, S. M., Massoni, S., Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J. (2016) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niw018 · Cited by 119
A postdecisional neural marker of confidence predicts information-seeking in decision-making
Desender, K., Murphy, P., Boldt, A., Verguts, T., & Yeung, N. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2620-18.2019 · Cited by 88
Assessing recognition memory using confidence ratings and response times
Weidemann, C. T., & Kahana, M. J. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150670 · Cited by 111
Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience
Collins, A. G. E., & Shenhav, A. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01126-y · Cited by 113
Wise or mad crowds? The cognitive mechanisms underlying information cascades
Tump, A. N., Pleskac, T. J., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0266 · Cited by 99
Self-citationKausel, E. E., Culbertson, S. S., & Madrid, H. P. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.07.005 · Cited by 109
Confidence predicts speed-accuracy tradeoff for subsequent decisions
Desender, K., Boldt, A., Verguts, T., & Donner, T. H. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.43499 · Cited by 107
Visual Decision-Making in an Uncertain and Dynamic World
Gold, J. I., & Stocker, A. A. (2017) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114511 · Cited by 106
Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions
Patel, D., Fleming, S. M., & Kilner, J. M. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1847 · Cited by 102
Post-decisional accounts of biases in confidence
Navajas, J., Bahrami, B., & Latham, P. E. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.005 · Cited by 97
On-line confidence monitoring during decision making
Dotan, D., Meyniel, F., & Dehaene, S. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.001 · Cited by 104
Relating Pupil Dilation and Metacognitive Confidence during Auditory Decision-Making
Lempert, K. M., Chen, Y. L., & Fleming, S. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126588 · Cited by 94
When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias
Trippas, D., Thompson, V. A., & Handley, S. J. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0680-1 · Cited by 95
What is adaptive about adaptive decision making? A parallel constraint satisfaction account
Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., & Jekel, M. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.017 · Cited by 100
Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.
Ratcliff, R. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030775 · Cited by 92
Curiosity as a Metacognitive Feeling
Goupil, L., & Proust, J. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105325 · Cited by 89
The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies
Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2011) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004149 · Cited by 89
Higher order thoughts in action: consciousness as an unconscious re-description process
Timmermans, B., Schilbach, L., Pasquali, A., & Axel Cleeremans, B. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0421 · Cited by 91
Noradrenaline blockade specifically enhances metacognitive performance
Hauser, T. U., Allen, M., Purg, N., Moutoussis, M., Rees, G., & Dolan, R. J. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.24901 · Cited by 87
Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty
Wu, C. M., Schulz, E., Pleskac, T. J., & Speekenbrink, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07901-1 · Cited by 103
Self-citationConfidence in consciousness research
Michel, M. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1628 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 864-901
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2158389550
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2011-01-17)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH019879)
- National Science Foundation (0817965)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- drift-diffusion model, confidence judgments, decision time, choice, random walks, evidence accumulation, time pressure, perceptual decision making, knowledge-based decision making, optimal decision strategies
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Signal Detection, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
