Cited by 522Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: A meta-analysis of decision-making

Krain, Amy L., Wilson, Amanda M., Arbuckle, Robert, Castellanos, F. Xavier, Milham, Michael P.·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

Converging evidence from human and animal studies suggests that decision-making relies upon a distributed neural network based in the frontal lobes. In particular, models of decision-making emphasize the involvement of orbitofrontal cortices (OFC) and the medial wall. While decision-making has been studied broadly as a class of executive function, recent models have suggested the differentiation between risky and ambiguous decision-making. Given recent emphasis on the role of OFC in affectively laden "hot" executive function and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in more purely cognitive "cool" executive function, we hypothesize that the neural substrates of decision-making may differ depending on the nature of the decision required. To test this hypothesis, we used recently developed meta-analytic techniques to examine the existent functional neuroimaging literature. An initial meta-analysis of decision-making, both risky and ambiguous, found significantly elevated probabilities of activation in frontal and parietal regions, thalamus, and caudate. Ambiguous decision-making was associated with activity in DLPFC, regions of dorsal and subcallosal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and parietal cortex. Risky decision-making was associated with activity in OFC, rostral portions of the ACC, and parietal cortex. Direct statistical comparisons revealed significant differences between risky and ambiguous decision-making in frontal regions, including OFC, DLPFC, and ACC, that were…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.047

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some regions reported in this review also appear in meta-analyses of other task domains, so they are not specific to emotion and also help constitute other cognitive and perceptual events.

    “means that these regions are not specific to emotion per se, and are also involved in constituting other cognitive and perceptual events”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Krain et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krain, A. L., Wilson, A. M., Arbuckle, R., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Krain, Amy L.
  • Milham, Michael P.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
477-484
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062485818
Cited by
522
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH074821)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
risky decision making, orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, executive function, frontal lobe, parietal cortex, caudate nucleus, thalamus
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Risk-Taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review