Cited by 56Values and Moral EducationPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Arousing “gentle passions” in young adolescents: Sustained experimental effects of value affirmations on prosocial feelings and behaviors.

Open access
Thomaes, Sander, Bushman, Brad J., de Castro, Bram Orobio, Reijntjes, Albert·2012·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

When people reflect on their important values, they may become more attuned to the needs of others. Two longitudinal field experiments examined whether a subtle value-affirmation manipulation can initiate relatively enduring increases in young adolescents' prosocial feelings (Study 1; Mage = 12.9) and prosocial behaviors (Study 2; Mage = 12.9). Participants completed a brief writing exercise that affirmed the values they deemed either most important (value-affirmation group) or unimportant (control group). As predicted, the value affirmation, coupled with a booster affirmation 6 weeks later, caused increases in prosocial feelings and behaviors over the 3-month study period. Antisocial students who were value-affirmed showed especially strong increases in prosocial behavior. These results suggest that "gentle passions" can be aroused in youth by cost- and time-efficient means. The practical utility of value affirmations will need to be evaluated in future work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025677

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In another field experiment, self-affirmation increased prosocial behavior among students with a history of antisocial behavior, as assessed by their teachers.

    “In another field experiment, self-affirmation increased prosocial behavior among students with a history of antisocial behavior, as assessed by their teachers (Thomaes et al. 2012).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Thomaes et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomaes, S., Bushman, B. J., de Castro, B. O., & Reijntjes, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
103-110
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2032402879
Cited by
55
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
values affirmation, prosocial behavior, early adolescents, antisocial behavior, self-affirmation, moral emotions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Analysis of Variance, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Netherlands, Psychometrics, Social Behavior, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review