Cited by 112Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Helping the self help others: self-affirmation increases self-compassion and pro-social behaviors

Open access
Lindsay, Emily K., Creswell, J. David·2014·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Reflecting on an important personal value in a self-affirmation activity has been shown to improve psychological functioning in a broad range of studies, but the underlying mechanisms for these self-affirmation effects are unknown. Here we provide an initial test of a novel self-compassion account of self-affirmation in two experimental studies. Study 1 shows that an experimental manipulation of self-affirmation (3-min of writing about an important personal value vs. writing about an unimportant value) increases feelings of self-compassion, and these feelings in turn mobilize more pro-social behaviors to a laboratory shelf-collapse incident. Study 2 tests and extends these effects by evaluating whether self-affirmation increases feelings of compassion toward the self (consistent with the self-compassion account) or increases feelings of compassion toward others (an alternative other-directed compassion account), using a validated storytelling behavioral task. Consistent with a self-compassion account, Study 2 demonstrates the predicted self-affirmation by video condition interaction, indicating that self-affirmation participants had greater feelings of self-compassion in response to watching their own storytelling performance (self-compassion) compared to watching a peer's storytelling performance (other-directed compassion). Further, pre-existing levels of trait self-compassion moderated this effect, such that self-affirmation increased self-compassionate responses the most in participants low in trait self-compassion. This work suggests that self-compassion may be a promising mechanism for self-affirmation effects, and that self-compassionate feelings can mobilize pro-social behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00421

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social relational emotions including compassion, gratitude and awe support an individual's capacity to connect with others and are powerful determinants of prosocial behavior.

    “For example, social relational emotions including compassion, gratitude and awe support an individual's capacity to connect with others and are powerful determinants of prosocial behavior (Bartlett and DeSteno, 2005; Grant and Gino, 2010; Lindsay and Creswell, 2014; Stellar et al., 2017).”

    From The Complex Construct of Wellbeing and the Role of Vagal Function (2022) · cites this paper as Lindsay and Creswell, 2014

    The Introduction says feelings of love and compassion may foster helping behavior, and the General Discussion reports that compassion boosted prosocial behavior in Study 1. The paper does not establish the same claim for awe or gratitude as distinct emotions; gratitude appears only as an item in a self-compassion measure. Its Study 1 Results also did not support feelings of connection as the mechanism for helping behavior. The indexed copy provides section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sherman D. K. Hartson K. A. (2011). “Reconciling self-protection with self-improvement,” in Self-Affirmation Theory eds Alicke M. Sedikides C. (New York, NY: Guilford Press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Creswell, J. David
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2014-05-12
Volume
5
Pages
421-421
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162890598
Cited by
112
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KiltHub Repository (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0924387)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM081760)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-affirmation, self-compassion, prosocial behavior, personal values, storytelling, trait self-compassion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review