Cited by 105Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace recognition and analysis

Generalization of affective learning about faces to perceptually similar faces

Verosky, Sara C., Todorov, Alexander·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

Different individuals have different (and different-looking) significant others, friends, and foes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether these social face environments can shape individual face preferences. First, participants learned to associate faces with positive, neutral, or negative behaviors. Then, they evaluated morphs combining novel faces with the learned faces. The morphs (65% and 80% novel faces) were within the categorical boundary of the novel faces: They were perceived as those faces in a preliminary study. Moreover, a second preliminary study showed that following the learning, the morphs' categorization as similar to the learned faces was indistinguishable from the categorization of actual novel faces. Nevertheless, in the main experiment, participants evaluated morphs of "positive" faces more positively than morphs of "negative" faces. This learning generalization effect increased as a function of the similarity of the novel faces to the learned faces. The findings suggest that general learning mechanisms based on similarity can account for idiosyncratic face preferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610371965

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluative conditioning has been shown to extend to social stimuli; individuals rapidly and unintentionally generalize affective processing to individuals who look physically similar.

    “This process of evaluative conditioning has been shown to extend to social stimuli; individuals rapidly and unintentionally generalize affective processing to individuals who look physically similar [41,42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verosky, S. C., & Todorov, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-05-18
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
779-785
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2123234965
Cited by
105
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face preference, face morphing, face classification
MeSH terms
Emotions, Face, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Learning, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review