CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 461Leadership and Management in OrganizationsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 211 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research

Open access
Lord, Robert G., Day, David V., Zaccaro, Stephen J., Avolio, Bruce J., Eagly, Alice H.·2017·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037/apl0000089
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Although in the early years of the Journal leadership research was rare and focused primarily on traits differentiating leaders from nonleaders, subsequent to World War II the research area developed in 3 major waves of conceptual, empirical, and methodological advances: (a) behavioral and attitude research; (b) behavioral, social-cognitive, and contingency research; and (c) transformational, social exchange, team, and gender-related research. Our review of this work shows dramatic increases in sophistication from early research focusing on personnel issues associated with World War I to contemporary multilevel models and meta-analyses on teams, shared leadership, leader-member exchange, gender, ethical, abusive, charismatic, and transformational leadership. Yet, many of the themes that characterize contemporary leadership research were also present in earlier research. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000089

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 211 references

1 of the 211 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 461

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Claremont McKenna College (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Lord, Robert G.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2017
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
434-451
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
DOI
10.1037/apl0000089
OpenAlex
W2582495316
Cited by
461
References
211
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12
FWCI
91.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
leadership, history of leadership research, transformational leadership, social exchange theory, team leadership, shared leadership, leader-member exchange, gender and leadership, abusive leadership, charismatic leadership, ethical leadership, contingency theory, multilevel models, meta-analysis
MeSH terms
Humans, Leadership, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Applied, Research, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review