The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school.
Open accessAbstract
=3,676). Although the intervention could still be improved even further, the current research provides a model for how to improve and scale interventions that begin to address pressing educational problems. It also provides insight into how to teach a growth mindset more effectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In preparing the intervention to be scalable, we revised past growth mindset interventions to focus on the perspectives, concerns and reading levels of ninth-grade students in the United States, through an intensive research and development process that involved interviews, focus groups and randomized pilot experiments with thousands of adolescents13.”
From A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The observation that mindset is a more important predictor of success for low-income students than for their high-income peers is novel, although it is consistent with prior research, which has found that a fixed mindset is more debilitating (and a growth mindset is more protective) when individuals must overcome significant barriers to succeed (13, 14).”
From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, a number of field experiments have now shown that growth mindset plays a causal role in achievement.”
From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The specific intervention evaluated here—a growth mindset of intelligence intervention—addresses the beliefs of adolescents about the nature of intelligence, leading students to see intellectual abilities not as fixed but as capable of growth in response to dedicated effort, trying new strategies and seeking help when appropriate12–16.”
From A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Nonetheless, previous randomized evaluations, including a pre-registered replication, found that online growth mindset interventions improved grades for the targeted group of students in secondary education who previously showed lower achievement13,16,18.”
From A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, it is also a belief that is potentially amenable to change (10–14).”
From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These field experiments, including two blinded, randomized, controlled studies conducted with over 1,500 participants each, have shown that targeted interventions can help students start to develop a growth mindset and that such interventions can lead to higher achievement for students facing greater adversity (10–14).”
From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“We chose fixed mindset items rather than growth mindset items because growth items sometimes create an acquiescence bias.”
From Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,136
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Self-citationEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 · Cited by 8,515
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor‐network‐theory
Turnbull, J. (2008) · New Zealand Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7939.2008.00151_4.x · Cited by 7,646
Motivational beliefs, values, and goals
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · Cited by 7,587
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
(1999) · Cited by 6,308
Self-citationImplementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kohavi R Longbotham R 2015 Online controlled experiments and A/B tests Sammut C Webb G Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining NY, NY Springer
- McCannon CJ Schall MW Perla RJ 2008 Planning for Scale: A Guide for Designing Large-Scale Improvement Initiatives IHI Innovation Series white paper Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y · Cited by 1,513
“Neither the self-reported mindsets, reported below, nor self-reported challenge-seeking, which is a single item reported in Yeager et al., 2016 and not discussed here for parsimony), showed significant variability.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMindsets: A View From Two Eras
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618804166 · Cited by 1,259
Self-citationWhat can be learned from growth mindset controversies?
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000794 · Cited by 868
Self-citationGrowth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement
Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1608207113 · Cited by 831
Self-citationInterest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732216655542 · Cited by 695
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O'Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- ICF International (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 374-391
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- PMC
- PMC4981081
- OpenAlex
- W2508466548
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 13
- FWCI
- 93.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Spencer Foundation
- William T. Grant Foundation
- Bezos Foundation
- Houston Endowment
- Character Lab
- Stanford University
- Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- design thinking, growth mindset, psychological intervention, transition to high school, scaling up interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review