The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Abstract
Ss overheard an epileptic seizure. They believed either that they alone heard the emergency, or that 1 or 4 unseen others were also present. As predicted the presence of other bystanders reduced the individual's feelings of personal responsibility and lowered his speed of reporting (p < .01). In groups of size 3, males reported no faster than females, and females reported no slower when the 1 other bystander was a male rather than a female. In general, personality and background measures were not predictive of helping. Bystander inaction in real-life emergencies is often explained by apathy, alienation, and anomie. This experiment suggests that the explanation may lie more in the bystander's response to other observers than in his indifference to the victim.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Darley and Latan e (1968) showed that people in larger groups feel less responsible and less personally addressed, which creates a bystander effect.”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Darley and Latan e (1968)
In the citing paper
“Despite macroinfluencers' sponsored posts being exposed to a larger number of users (De Veirman, Cauberghe, and Hudders 2017), people in larger groups feel less responsible and addressed and then stand by rather than act (Darley and Latan e 1968).”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Darley and Latan e 1968
Citations
Cites
Miller, N. E., & Dollar, D. (1944) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-194402000-00051 · Cited by 1,536
Child Training and Personality
Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1953) · Revista Mexicana de Sociología · doi:10.2307/3537788 · Cited by 643
Gallo, M. M. (2018) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801455902-005 · Cited by 110
Liking and Response to Dependency Relationships
Daniels, L. R., & Berkowitz, L. J. (1963) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872676301600203 · Cited by 86
Aronfreed, J. (1964) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047689 · Cited by 60
Child Training and Personality
Stevenson, H. W., Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1954) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418513 · Cited by 59
Berkowitz, L. J., Klanderman, S. B., & Harris, R. (1964) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2785622 · Cited by 57
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 3,085
Ethics and Network Organizations
Phillips, R. A. (2010) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq201020333 · Cited by 45
Nonreactive Measures in Racial Attitude Research: A Focus on “Liberals”
Gaertner, S. L. (1976) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-018316-9.50014-x · Cited by 45
Ubiquitous Watergate: An attributional analysis.
West, S. G., Gunn, S. P., & Chernicky, P. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076858 · Cited by 45
Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration?
Tang, L., Hu, G., Sui, Y., Yang, Y., & Cao, C. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00209-1 · Cited by 45
Lantz, B. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518786497 · Cited by 44
“…compared with when they were alone.2 These behavior changes in the presence of others are in part because individuals can free themselves from obligation (i.e., shift responsibility) in these scenarios (Darley & Latane, 1968; Myatt & Sherman, 1975; Vaillancourt, Stiell, & Wells, 2008; Whyte, 1991).”
BackgroundCultural determinants of media choice for deception
Furner, C. P., & George, J. F. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.005 · Cited by 45
Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2005) · Cited by 44
The Sanctioning Dilemma: A Quasi-Experiment on Social Norm Enforcement in the Train
Przepiorka, W., & Berger, J. L. (2016) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcw014 · Cited by 46
“U i ¼ U j and K i ¼ K j V i 6¼ j ), this diffusion of responsibility effect (Darley and Latane´, 1968; Diekmann, 1985) can be derived from the mixed strategy equilibrium (MSE).”
Responsive bystander behaviour in cyberbullying: a path through self-efficacy
Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. M. V., Paiva, A., & Ferreira, A. I. (2019) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1602671 · Cited by 44
“We tested the BIM (Darley and Latané 1968) with regards to adolescents’ Aggressive, Reporting and Direct Problem-solving Behaviour as bystanders of cyberbullying incidents.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of sound environment on the sleep of college students in China
Meng, Q., Zhang, J., Kang, J., & Wu, Y. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135794 · Cited by 44
Collins, J. C., Zhang, P., & Sisco, S. T. (2021) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843211040734 · Cited by 44
Estimating Achievement Performance: A Confirmation Bias
Murray, C. B. (1996) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984960221006 · Cited by 43
Thompson, M. M., & Jetly, R. (2014) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.3402/ejpt.v5.23668 · Cited by 54
“…not for citation purpose) (Festinger, 1954), social learning (Bandura, 1962), social influence (Kelman, 1958), and diffusion of responsibility and bystander effects (Darley & Latane, 1968) can profoundly affect a variety of attitudes and behavior, findings echoed by military ethicist Cossar (2008).”
Inhibition of helping behavior by a similar or dissimilar nonreactive fellow bystander.
Smith, R. E., Smythe, L., & Lien, D. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033136 · Cited by 43
Empathy, guilt proneness, and gender: Relative contributions to prosocial behaviour
Torstveit, L., Sütterlin, S., & Lugo, R. G. (2016) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1097 · Cited by 43
“Much of the earlier research has looked at the phenomena at a group-level (Darley & Batson, 1973; Darley & Latané, 1968; Markey, 2000).”
BackgroundPersonality Depends on The Medium
Taber, L., & Whittaker, S. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174181 · Cited by 51
Behavior during cyberbullying episodes: Initial validation of a new self‐report scale
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12517 · Cited by 49
Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S., & Wnek, D. (1972) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01260.x · Cited by 43
Moral Reasoning at Work: Rethinking Ethics in Organizations
Kvalnes, Ø. (2019) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15191-1 · Cited by 46
Are Nonparticipants in Prosocial Behavior Merely Innocent Bystanders?
Anker, A. E., & Feeley, T. H. (2011) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.527618 · Cited by 42
“Darley and Latané (1968) suggest that as more bystanders are present, the target bystander assumes that (1) diffusion of blame will occur for failing to take action, (2) diffusion of responsibility will occur for taking action, and (3) someone else will potentially intervene in the situation.”
BackgroundDual effects of implicit bystanders: Inhibiting vs. facilitating helping behavior
Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K. D., Darley, J. M., & Spence, B. T. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.013 · Cited by 48
Self-citationSong, J., & Oh, I. (2017) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034317699997 · Cited by 42
“From a social psychology perspective, ‘bystander effect’ refers to the reluctance to intervene in emergency situations, especially in the presence of witnesses other than oneself (Darley & Latané, 1968).”
BackgroundOn the Actual Risk of Bystander Intervention
Liebst, L. S., Heinskou, M. B., & Ejbye‐Ernst, P. (2018) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427817710776 · Cited by 43
The Spectrum of Hazing and Peer Sexual Abuse in Sports: A Current Perspective
Jeckell, A. S., Copenhaver, E. A., & Diamond, A. B. (2018) · Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach · doi:10.1177/1941738118797322 · Cited by 44
“Failure to act appropriately may empower the perpetrators and increase the psychological sequelae resulting from the abuse.(5,10) After 1 notable hazing incident, the district school board involved pursued an independent investigation into the environment that had allowed such an event to take place.”
BackgroundTranscending Organizational Compassion Paradoxes by Enacting Wise Compassion Courageously
Simpson, A. V., & Berti, M. (2019) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492618821188 · Cited by 45
“That compassion requires courage is demonstrated by the famous bystander effect, where the likelihood of an individual helping a person in an emergency decreases as the number of bystanders increases (Darley & Latane, 1968).”
BackgroundSharing responsibility with a machine
Kirchkamp, O., & Strobel, C. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.02.010 · Cited by 46
“Darley and Latané (1968) propose the concept of di usion of responsibility: sel sh decisions in groups are caused by the possibility to share the responsibility for the outcome among group members.”
BackgroundInfluentialBarhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., Grassetti, S. N., & Morrow, M. T. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1046180 · Cited by 47
Adaptive Group Coordination and Role Differentiation
Roberts, M. E., & Goldstone, R. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022377 · Cited by 42
“In this respect, the GBS game is a paradigmatic task where orderly diffusion of responsibility is a good thing in contrast to its often tragic consequences in situations of social helping [26].”
BackgroundShould Organizational Behavior Management Expand Its Content?
Geller, E. S. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1300/j075v22n02_03 · Cited by 42
“The bystander intervention paradigm (Darley & Latané, 1968) has been the most common (and rigorous) laboratory technique used to study variables related to actively caring.”
MethodStuck on Intergroup Attitudes: The Need to Shift Gears to Change Intergroup Behaviors
Bräuer, M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231185775 · Cited by 50
“One example that motivated this focus was bystander behavior during the rape and murder of Kitty Genovese (Darley & Latané, 1968).”
BackgroundSelf‐face recognition in social context
Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Jeong, H., Wakusawa, K., Horie, K., Sato, S., & Kawashima, R. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21290 · Cited by 44
“Mere exposure to others is classically known to affect human behavior presumably via a change in one’s recognition of themselves in the social context [Darley and Latane, 1968; Hunt and Hillery, 1973].”
BackgroundSoziologie und Ökonomie: Der Beitrag experimenteller Wirtschaftsforschung zur Sozialtheorie*
Diekmann, A. (2008) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-008-0026-5 · Cited by 41
Timmy’s in the well: Empathy and prosocial helping in dogs
Sanford, E. M., Burt, E. R., & Meyers-Manor, J. E. (2018) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-018-0332-3 · Cited by 41
Workplace cyberbullying and bystander helping behaviour
Madden, C., & Loh, J. M. I. (2018) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1449130 · Cited by 44
Hidden in plain sight: the bystander effect and the mobilisation of modern slavery whistleblowing
Stevenson, M. (2021) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-08-2020-0373 · Cited by 41
The Bystander Dilemma and Child Abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley Model to Domestic Violence1
Hoefnagels, C., & Zwikker, M. (2001) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02668.x · Cited by 41
“…to perceive an emergency (Latane & Darley, 1970), the effect of the number of other bystanders on feelings of responsibility (Bickman, 1971; Darley & Latane, 1968; Harari, Harari, & White, 1989, and the effects of personality characteristics on helping behavior (Latane & Darley, 1970;…”
BackgroundCrime reporting as a function of bystander encouragement, surveillance, and credibility.
Bickman, L., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.35.8.577 · Cited by 43
Lynch, J. G., & Cohen, J. L. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.36.10.1138 · Cited by 41
Quality Circles in the United States: A Conceptual Reevaluation
Ferris, G. R., & Wagner, J. A. (1985) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638502100208 · Cited by 41
Sex differences in bystander reactions to physical assault
Borofsky, G. L., Stollak, G. E., & Messé, L. A. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(71)90031-x · Cited by 41
Prosocial Norms as a Positive Youth Development Construct: A Conceptual Review
Siu, A. M. H., Shek, D. T. L., & Law, B. M. F. (2012) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/2012/832026 · Cited by 40
“It will also be interesting to examine how computer and information technology or video games may be used in e-learning of prosocial norms.”
BackgroundNew Approaches to Defender and Outsider Roles in School Bullying
Yun, H. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13312 · Cited by 49
Do You Care Who Flagged This Post? Effects of Moderator Visibility on Bystander Behavior
Bhandari, A., Ozanne, M., Bazarova, N. N., et al. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmab007 · Cited by 40
Hellmann, M., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08041 · Cited by 40
“Pandemic-specific context factors associated with prosocial behavior Other evidence, however, also demonstrates a high degree of context sensitivity of prosocial behavior (e.g., Cuadrado et al., 2016; Decety et al., 2016; Chen and Li, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Bystander Approach: Strengths-Based Sexual Assault Prevention With At-Risk Groups
McMahon, S., & Farmer, G. L. (2009) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911350902990304 · Cited by 40
“That incident motivated the work Latane and Darley to study how bystanders react to emergencies and why they do not intervene ( Darley & Latane, 1968 ; Latane & Darley, 1970 ).”
BackgroundSantamaria, J. P., & Rosenbaum, D. Α. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611406444 · Cited by 40
“Although cooperation and other forms of social behavior have been studied for decades (Darley & Latane, 1968; Fehr & Rockenbach, 2004; Wilson, 1975), little attention has been paid to social interactions that require or benefit from physical cooperation.”
BackgroundThe Case for Post‐Modern Management Accounting: Thinking Outside the Box
Birnberg, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar.2009.21.1.3 · Cited by 37
If the Noise Coming from Next Door were Loud Music, You'd Do Something About It
Cismaru, M., Jensen, G., & Lavack, A. M. (2010) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367390405 · Cited by 40
“Following Rosenthal’s (1964) landmark book detailing the tragic death of Kitty Genovese, Darley and Latané (1968) and Latané and Darley (1970) conducted several psychological experiments, considered seminal for later research on bystander intervention in emergencies in general (Carlson 2008).”
MethodOnline silence: why do people not challenge others when posting misinformation?
Gurgun, S., Arden-Close, E. J., Phalp, K. T., & Ali, R. (2022) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2022-0407 · Cited by 44
Fennis, B. M., & Aarts, H. (2012) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1887 · Cited by 38
Hust, S. J. T., Lei, M., Ren, C., Chang, H., McNab, A. L., Marett, E. G., & Willoughby, J. F. (2013) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.816737 · Cited by 39
Personal distress and the influence of bystanders on responding to an emergency
Hortensius, R., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & de Gelder, B. (2016) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-016-0423-6 · Cited by 41
“This phenomenon is known as the bystander effect (Darley & Latané, 1968).”
BackgroundMartini, M., & Piccoli, N. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326 · Cited by 45
Causes and consequences of coalitional cognition
Cikara, M. (2021) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.04.002 · Cited by 42
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?
Armstrong, J. S., & Hubbard, R. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00065699 · Cited by 37
Diffusion of responsibility and extreme behavior.
Mathes, E. W., & Kahn, A. S. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076695 · Cited by 39
Haran, U. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1745 · Cited by 36
“…of moral judgments (Gino et al. 2010, Haidt 2007, Sunstein 2005), perceptions of personal responsibility and their relation to moral judgments (Darley and Latane 1968, Higgins et al. 1984), and uncertainty and relational issues in contracts (Bernstein 1992, 2001; Feldman and Teichman 2011).”
BackgroundRafaeli, S., Dan-Gur, Y., & Barak, M. (2005) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/jdet.2005040103 · Cited by 39
Prosocial Consequences of Imitation
Müller, B. C. N., Maaskant, A. J., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/07.09.21.pr0.110.3.891-898 · Cited by 40
“For example, early research on helping demonstrated the strong influence of other people being present in an emergency (Darley & Latane, 1968; Latane & Darley, 1968).”
BackgroundHelping a motorist in distress: The effects of sex, race, and neighborhood.
West, S. G., Whitney, G., & Schnedler, R. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.31.4.691 · Cited by 39
The Bystander Intervention Model: Teacher Intervention in Traditional and Cyber Bullying
Eldridge, M. A., & Jenkins, L. N. (2019) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-019-00033-7 · Cited by 51
“In this step, bystanders often look to others to guide their interpretation (Latané and Darley 1968), although dangerous situations are associated with a lesser bystander effect (Fischer et al. 2011).”
BackgroundConflict and avoidance in the helping situation.
Pancer, S. M., McMullen, L. M., Kabatoff, R. A., et al. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.8.1406 · Cited by 38
Chui, C. W. S., & Dietz, J. (2014) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0367-7 · Cited by 38
“The third person’s inactivity might have led the participants to be affected by diffusion of responsibility (Darley and Latane 1968), potentially resulting in them not judging it necessary to intervene.”
BackgroundIndirect aggression, bullying and female teen victimization: a literature review
Catanzaro, M. F. (2011) · Pastoral Care in Education · doi:10.1080/02643944.2011.573495 · Cited by 38
“The ‘bystander effect’ (Darley & Latane, 1968) occurs in the presence of other people, and the willingness of people to step in decreases along with feelings of personal responsibility, when they see someone else being victimized (Simmons, 2002; McDougall, 2007).”
BackgroundBorsky, A. E., McDonnell, K. A., Turner, M. M., & Rimal, R. N. (2016) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260516635322 · Cited by 38
“These programs build on research related to diffusion of responsibility and the factors that contribute to a person intervening in a potentially negative situation (Darley, 1968; Latane & Darley, 1968).”
BackgroundGuilt in voting and public good games
Rothenhaüsler, D., Schweizer, N., & Szech, N. (2017) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.08.001 · Cited by 38
“Equating (9) and (10) for x = θk,n yields condition (3) as stated in the proposition.”
BackgroundYule, K., Hoxmeier, J. C., Petranu, K., & Grych, J. H. (2020) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520916277 · Cited by 39
Induced Competence and the Bystander Effect1
Pantin, H. M., & Carver, C. S. (1982) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00852.x · Cited by 38
An interventionist approach to psychological explanation
Rescorla, M. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1553-2 · Cited by 37
“…various “effects,” such as the McGurk effect (MacDonald and McGurk 1978), the Garcia effect (Garcia and Koelling 1966), the ventriloquism effect (Alais and Burr 2004), the spacing effect (Madigan 1969), the Stroop effect (Stroop 1935), the bystander effect (Darley and Latané 1968), and many others.”
Horowitz, M. C., Stewart, B., Tingley, D. H., Bishop, M., Samotin, L. R., Roberts, M. E., Chang, W., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/704437 · Cited by 40
“…how putting individuals into groups can lead to polarization of opinions (Myers and Lamm 1976) and social loafing and diffusion of responsibility (Darley and Latane 1968; Karau and Williams 1993), and how it can typically privilege public information over privately held information even when…”
BackgroundDo dogs (Canis familiaris) seek help in an emergency?
Macpherson, K., & Roberts, W. A. (2006) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.113 · Cited by 37
“This research revealed that human failure to help someone in an emergency arose more from mechanisms of social inhibition and diffusion of guilt than from an unwillingness to help another person (Darley & Latane, 1968; Latane & Darley, 1968, 1970).”
Cell Phone Usage and Social Interaction with Proximate Others: Ringing in a Theoretical Model
Banjo, O. O., Hu, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2008) · The Open Communication Journal · doi:10.2174/1874916x00802010127 · Cited by 37
“One of the important reasons is that helping behavior decreases as the number of bystanders increases – the bystander effect (Cialdini, 1993; Darley & Latané, 1968; Latané & Darley, 1969).”
BackgroundExamining retaliatory responses to justice violations and recovery attempts in teams.
Christian, J. S., Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029450 · Cited by 40
Information Sampling, Belief Synchronization, and Collective Illusions
Denrell, J. C., & Mens, G. L. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2354 · Cited by 39
“…assume that people use popularity as an indication of quality: if most others like alternative A better than alternative B, people infer that alternative A is likely superior (Banerjee 1992, Bikhchandani et al. 1992, Darley and Latané 1968, Deutsch and Gerard 1955, Prentice and Miller 1993).”
BackgroundRestoring Agency to the Human Actor
Swann, W. B., & Jetten, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616679464 · Cited by 43
“Similar issues arise when applying the power-of-thesituation narrative to the bystander intervention studies reported by Darley and Latane (1968).”
BackgroundResultDeterminants of Fast-Food Consumption in Romania: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior
Bîlbîie, A., Druică, E., Dumitrescu, R., Aducovschi, D., SAKIZLIAN, R., & Sakizlian, M. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10081877 · Cited by 40
“While some studies show that injunctive norms account for a larger variability in the behavioral intention and behavior than descriptive norms do [48,49], other contributions show the opposite [50].”
Knowledge Contribution in the Online Virtual Community: Capability and Motivation
Wang, C., & Lai, C.-Y. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11811220_37 · Cited by 37
“One possible explanation for the insignificant relationship between altruism and knowledge contribution is that there exists a bystander effect for the influence of altruism on helping behavior [ 24 ].”
BackgroundWhen prosocial behavior becomes altruistic: An attributional analysis
Swap, W. C. (1991) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02686780 · Cited by 37
Altruism and Consumer Purchase Behavior
Powers, T. L., & Hopkins, R. A. (2006) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1300/j046v19n01_06 · Cited by 37
“The level of responsibility individuals and bystanders in a group assume when they intervene in an emergency (Darley and Latane, 1968; Latane and Darley, 1968), and the role of empathy in motivating witnesses to relieve the distress of another in need also influence the temporary psychological…”
BackgroundHumans Would Do Better Without Groups
Buys, C. J. (1978) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616727800400126 · Cited by 37
Ruralness as a Psychological Construct
Melton, G. B. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3512-2_1 · Cited by 37
Samuels, S. M., & Casebeer, W. D. (2005) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240500049349 · Cited by 36
“Darley and Latane's ( 1968 ) bystander effect showed that subjects were less likely to intervene in an emergency if there was another subject present than if they were alone.”
BackgroundShi, R., Qi, W., Ding, Y., Liu, C., & Shen, W. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109828 · Cited by 40
Evaluation of a Bystander Education Program
Amar, A. F., Sutherland, M. A., & Kesler, E. (2012) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.3109/01612840.2012.709915 · Cited by 36
“The story of Kitty Genovese is often used as an example of a situation where bystanders did not act and to demonstrate research about bystander behavior (Darley & Latane, 1968).”
MethodVolunteer’s Dilemma. A Social Trap without a Dominant Strategy and some Empirical Results
Diekmann, A. (1986) · Physica-Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_13 · Cited by 36
Personal Responsibility for Tornado Preparedness: Commitment or Choice?1
Mulilis, J., Duval, T. S., & ROMBACH, D. (2001) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02745.x · Cited by 36
Diffusion of responsibility on social networking sites
Martin, K. K., & North, A. C. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.049 · Cited by 33
Wilke, S., Opdenakker, C., Kremers, S., & Gubbels, J. S. (2013) · Early Years Journal of International Research and Development · doi:10.1080/09575146.2013.810592 · Cited by 35
“…support, derived from social cognitive theory (Bandura 1986); habits (Verplanken, Aarts, and van Knippenberg 1997), perceived responsibility, i.e. ‘diffusion of responsibility’ (Darley and Latane 1968) and motivation, emphasised by self-determination theory (Amorose and Anderson-Butcher 2007).”
BackgroundQu, C., Ling, Y., Heynderickx, I. E. J., & Brinkman, W. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125279 · Cited by 35
“The probability that a person actually provides help is inversely related to the number of other bystanders [18].”
Vink, M. J., Benson, D., Boezeman, D., et al. (2014) · Journal of Water and Climate Change · doi:10.2166/wcc.2014.119 · Cited by 35
Patterns of cooperation during collective emergencies in the help-or-escape social dilemma
Moussaïd, M., & Trauernicht, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep33417 · Cited by 40
The role of other customers during self-service technology failure
Yi, Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2016) · Service Business · doi:10.1007/s11628-016-0325-2 · Cited by 35
The assessment of bystander intervention in bullying: Examining measurement invariance across gender
Jenkins, L. N., Fredrick, S. S., & Nickerson, A. B. (2018) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.008 · Cited by 35
Bystanders’ affect toward bully and victim as predictors of helping and non‐helping behaviour
Trach, J., & Hymel, S. C. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12516 · Cited by 58
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Foot and Mouth Disease Control in Large Ruminants in Cambodia
Young, J. R., Suon, S., Rast, L., et al. (2014) · Transboundary and Emerging Diseases · doi:10.1111/tbed.12292 · Cited by 35
Nishina, A., & Bellmore, A. D. (2009) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431609350928 · Cited by 35
“Finally, given the social liabilities of being victimized (e.g., unpopularity), as well as research about bystander effects (e.g., Darley & Latané, 1968), we predicted that students would report rarely receiving help but that sixth graders would be more likely to receive help from adults than ninth…”
BackgroundEndrejat, P. C., Klonek, F. E., & Kauffeld, S. (2015) · Indoor and Built Environment · doi:10.1177/1420326x15598820 · Cited by 34
“In the context of nonresidential buildings, employees tend to argue that their energy-saving behaviours would not lead to the desired consequences(44) and thus do not ascribe responsibility to their action, ultimately leading to a diffusion of responsibility.(45) In offices, for instance, employees might not turn off…”
BackgroundLouis, W. R., & Taylor, D. M. (2002) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00029.x · Cited by 35
“Specifically, urban norms for social behavior may lead bystanders to avoid excessive scrutiny of strangers, and urban norms regarding responsibility permit the bystanders to overlook what is happening in front of their eyes ( Darley & Latane, 1968 ).”
BackgroundCausal Thinking in Judgment under Uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. J. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0837-1_11 · Cited by 35
Krosnick, J. A., & Sedikides, C. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.718 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Darley, J. M., & Latane, B.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1968
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4, Pt.1
- Pages
- 377-383
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2171602877
- Semantic Scholar
- a17d8ee9f157ebeb2f520406c1d79346ceb532c8
- Cited by
- 3,083
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 175 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 138 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 113.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Keywords
- bystander intervention, diffusion of responsibility, emergency situations, helping behavior, personal responsibility, group size, gender differences, apathy, anomie, alienation
- MeSH terms
- Character, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Emergencies, Female, Group Processes, Group Structure, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Perception, Psychology, Social, Reaction Time, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review