The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Abstract
Ss overheard an epileptic seizure. They believed either that they alone heard the emergency, or that 1 or 4 unseen others were also present. As predicted the presence of other bystanders reduced the individual's feelings of personal responsibility and lowered his speed of reporting (p < .01). In groups of size 3, males reported no faster than females, and females reported no slower when the 1 other bystander was a male rather than a female. In general, personality and background measures were not predictive of helping. Bystander inaction in real-life emergencies is often explained by apathy, alienation, and anomie. This experiment suggests that the explanation may lie more in the bystander's response to other observers than in his indifference to the victim.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Darley and Latan e (1968) showed that people in larger groups feel less responsible and less personally addressed, which creates a bystander effect.”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Darley and Latan e (1968)
In the citing paper
“Despite macroinfluencers' sponsored posts being exposed to a larger number of users (De Veirman, Cauberghe, and Hudders 2017), people in larger groups feel less responsible and addressed and then stand by rather than act (Darley and Latan e 1968).”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Darley and Latan e 1968
Citations
Cites
Miller, N. E., & Dollar, D. (1944) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-194402000-00051 · Cited by 1,536
Child Training and Personality
Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1953) · Revista Mexicana de Sociología · doi:10.2307/3537788 · Cited by 643
Gallo, M. M. (2018) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801455902-005 · Cited by 110
Liking and Response to Dependency Relationships
Daniels, L. R., & Berkowitz, L. J. (1963) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872676301600203 · Cited by 86
Aronfreed, J. (1964) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047689 · Cited by 60
Child Training and Personality
Stevenson, H. W., Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1954) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418513 · Cited by 59
Berkowitz, L. J., Klanderman, S. B., & Harris, R. (1964) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2785622 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 3,085
Gao, J., Greenberg, R., & Wong‐On‐Wing, B. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-2008-4 · Cited by 153
“The bystander effect, documented by Latané and Darley (1968), suggests that the presence of other people will inhibit one’s intention to help.”
BackgroundShared interest and honesty in budget reporting
Church, B. K., Hannan, R. L., & Kuang, X. (2012) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.002 · Cited by 152
“…arrangement, in which the manager has full authority for budget reporting, because it precludes potential confounding effects of ‘‘diffusion of responsibility’’ (Darley & Latane, 1968; Mynatt & Sherman, 1975) or the assistant’s specific input (if allowed) on the manager’s reporting behavior.”
BackgroundBullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention
Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2016) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21688 · Cited by 153
Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93
Quinn, R. W., & Worline, M. C. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0331 · Cited by 155
What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments?
Gillath, O., McCall, C., Shaver, P. R., & Blascovich, J. (2008) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260801906489 · Cited by 159
“As expected, people’s reactions to a virtual needy person were similar to reactions in real-world environments (e.g., Darley & Latane, 1968; Gueguen & De Gail, 2003).”
ResultBenjamin, L. T., & Simpson, J. A. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014077 · Cited by 155
“…under which strong emotions are perceived (Schachter & Singer, 1962), the conditions under which bystanders intervene during emergencies (e.g., Darley & Latané, 1968; I. M. Piliavin, Rodin, & Piliavin, 1969), and how quickly and completely individuals assume assigned " roles " in a simulated…”
BackgroundThe illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.
Gilovich, T. D., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.332 · Cited by 602
Thinking about the Past: Early Knowledge about Links between Prior Experience, Thinking, and Emotion
Lagattuta, K. H., & Wellman, H. M. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00267 · Cited by 149
The self-protective altruist: Terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior
Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Almakias, S. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207313933 · Cited by 148
Together We Rise: How Social Movements Succeed
Nardini, G., Rank‐Christman, T., Bublitz, M. G., Cross, S. N. N., & Peracchio, L. A. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1201 · Cited by 166
Theories of human altruism: a systematic review
Feigin, S., Owens, G. R., & Goodyear‐Smith, F. (2014) · Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Functions · doi:10.7243/2055-3447-1-5 · Cited by 165
“For example, when the bystander is one among several others, diffusion of responsibility may occur [45,77,78].”
BackgroundKettrey, H. H., & Marx, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0927-1 · Cited by 160
Development of moral thought, feeling, and behavior.
Hoffman, M. L. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.958 · Cited by 142
Social Psychology and the Study of Sexual Behavior
Byrne, D. (1976) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616727600300102 · Cited by 144
The Indeterminacy Paradox: Character Evaluations and Human Psychology
Vranas, P. B. M. (2005) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00492.x · Cited by 144
Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations
Song, J., & Oh, I. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008 · Cited by 158
The Many Ways to Be Marginal in a Group
Ellemers, N., & Jetten, J. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312453086 · Cited by 139
“…will only exert effort on behalf of the group when this is likely to be personally beneficial, and this might lead to freeriding and social loafing (Darley & Latane, 1968; Jackson & Williams, 1985; Olson, 1965) whereby the individual’s awareness that the group wants them more than they want the…”
BackgroundCharacter and Environment: The Status of Virtues in Organizations
Alzola, M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9335-7 · Cited by 138
Garcia, S. M., & Tor, A. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02385.x · Cited by 141
“…decades of research on a similar behavioral phenomenon—bystander apathy—have shown it to be multiply determined (e.g., diffusion of responsibility: Darley & Latane, 1968; social influence: Darley, Teger, & Lewis, 1973; confusion of responsibility: Cacioppo, Petty, & Losch, 1986; pluralistic…”
Private incentives in social dilemmas
Palfrey, T. R., & Rosenthal, H. L. (1988) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(88)90035-7 · Cited by 140
Group Social Context and Children's Aggressive Behavior
DeRosier, M. E., Cillessen, A. H. N., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00803.x · Cited by 137
Stress leads to prosocial action in immediate need situations
Buchanan, T. W., & Preston, S. D. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00005 · Cited by 136
Manis, M. (1977) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616727700300402 · Cited by 137
“In one part of this experiment the subjects read about a study by Darley and Latane (1968) that was concerned with people’s readiness to help someone who appeared to be having an epileptic seizure.”
BackgroundGoldenberg, A., Saguy, T., & Halperin, E. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037462 · Cited by 136
Challenge and Opportunity in Evaluating a Diffusion-Based Active Bystanding Prevention Program
Cook-Craig, P. G., Coker, A. L., Clear, E. R., Garcia, L. S., Bush, H., Brancato, C. J., Williams, C. M., & Fisher, B. S. (2014) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801214551288 · Cited by 139
“…built on a synthesis of literature examining what inhibited bystanders from intervening (Bryan & Test, 1967; Chekroun & Brauer, 2002; Clark & Word, 1974; Darley & Latané, 1968; Goldman & Harlow, 1993; Latané & Darley, 1970; Rushton & Campbell, 1977) and contextual factors in college communities.”
BackgroundBe aware to care: Public self-awareness leads to a reversal of the bystander effect
van Bommel, M., van Prooijen, J., Elffers, H., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.011 · Cited by 153
“This so-called bystander effect has become wellestablished in a longstanding tradition of research since the classic work of Darley and Latané (1968), and it became widely known through anecdotal evidence.”
BackgroundGoethals, G. R., & Allison, S. T. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00004-0 · Cited by 144
Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication
Markey, P. M. (2000) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(99)00056-4 · Cited by 137
“However, an analysis of the case of Amanda suggests that, similar to the Kitty Genovese case, ‘‘factors other than apathy and indiAerence were involved’’ ( Latane & Darley, 1968a, p. 377 ).”
ResultBjärehed, M., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Gini, G. (2019) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431618824745 · Cited by 145
“Diffusion of responsibility is a well-known process that inhibits adult bystanders from intervening in emergency situations (e.g., Darley & Latané, 1968; Latané & Darley, 1970) and has also been found to inhibit defender behavior among children in school bullying situations (Thornberg & Jungert,…”
BackgroundThe multiple facets of empathy: a survey of theory and evidence
Leiberg, S., & Anders, S. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56023-6 · Cited by 134
Campos‐Castillo, C., & Hitlin, S. (2013) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275113489811 · Cited by 145
“Finally, witnesses to an emergency are less likely to assist the person who needs help when others are present (Darley and Latané 1968).”
BackgroundSchool reform proposals : the research evidence
Molnar, A., Barnett, W. S., Finn, J. D., et al. (2002) · Information Age Pub. eBooks · Cited by 130
THE USE OF ROLE PLAYING AND INDUCTION IN CHILDREN'S LEARNING OF HELPING AND SHARING BEHAVIOR
Staub, E. (1971) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1971.tb03701.x · Cited by 130
Lilienfeld, S. O., Sauvigné, K. C., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., Latzman, R. D., & Waldman, I. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100 · Cited by 140
“The classic work of (e.g., Darley and Latane, 1968; Latane and Rodin, 1969) underscored the counterintuitive point that when it comes to emergencies, there is rarely “safety in numbers.””
BackgroundGroup-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysis
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.02.001 · Cited by 130
Toward an Integrative Model of Affect Regulation: Applications to Social‐Psychological Research
Westen, D. (1994) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00312.x · Cited by 137
Psychological and Biological Perspectives on Altruism
Hoffman, M. L. (1978) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/016502547800100403 · Cited by 132
Carruthers, P. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.009 · Cited by 133
Chapter 1 The Introspection Illusion
Pronin, E. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00401-2 · Cited by 139
Interrelated and interdependent
Diamond, A. D. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00578.x · Cited by 137
Self‐Serving Attributions for Performance in Naturalistic Settings: A Meta‐Analytic Review1
Mullen, B. R., & Riordan, C. A. (1988) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00001.x · Cited by 127
When fellow customers behave badly: Witness reactions to employee mistreatment by customers.
Hershcovis, M. S., & Bhatnagar, N. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000249 · Cited by 129
The Psychology of Charitable Donations to Disaster Victims and Beyond
Zagefka, H., & James, T. K. (2015) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12013 · Cited by 136
“The seminal work on the bystander effect (Darley & Latane, 1968) describes a situation where a group of onlookers remains passive, unwilling or unable to help a victim.”
BackgroundSelf-compassion, empathy, and helping intentions
Welp, L. R., & Brown, C. M. (2013) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.831465 · Cited by 148
“Research on the bystander effect (e.g. Darley & Latane, 1968) has long shown that the situation is the most powerful determinant of helping.”
BackgroundThe Evolutionary Basis of Rigidity: Locks in Cells, Minds, and Society
Scheffer, M., & Westley, F. R. (2007) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02275-120236 · Cited by 123
“For instance, early studies in experimental psychology have shown that people’s response to calls for help in emergency situations depends very much on how they read the response of those around them (Darley and Latane 1968).”
BackgroundAn online bystander intervention program for the prevention of sexual violence.
Kleinsasser, A. L., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., & Rosenfield, D. (2014) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/a0037393 · Cited by 123
Shared responsibility in collective decisions
Zein, M. E., Bahrami, B., & Hertwig, R. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0596-4 · Cited by 137
Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2019) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000469 · Cited by 137
Berry, D. R., Hoerr, J. P., Cesko, S., Alayoubi, A., Carpio, K., Zirzow, H., Walters, W., Scram, G., Rodriguez, K., & Beaver, V. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219900418 · Cited by 137
“More importantly, in this real-world simulation, two bystanders did nothing to help—a common social occurrence that typically suppresses helping (Darley & Latané, 1968).”
BackgroundBaumeister, R. F., Ainsworth, S. E., & Vohs, K. D. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000618 · Cited by 131
Santarius, T., & Soland, M. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.009 · Cited by 142
Sagan, S. D. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00495.x · Cited by 121
Consensus information, prediction, and causal attribution: A review of the literature and issues.
Kassin, S. M. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.1966 · Cited by 123
The Structure of Online Activism
Lewis, K., Gray, K., & Meierhenrich, J. (2014) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v1.a1 · Cited by 121
Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D. J., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012) · Canadian Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1177/0829573512450567 · Cited by 120
“In the case of bullying among children, bystanders may feel that the presence of others absolves them from being responsible for intervening (i.e., “diffusion of responsibility” effect; Darley and Latané, 1968) or they may view the lack of action from others as a sign that intervention is unnecessary (Salmivalli, 2010…”
BackgroundChugunova, M., & Sele, D. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101897 · Cited by 118
Moral disengagement and cyberbullying involvement: A systematic review
Cricchio, M. G. L., García‐Poole, C., Brinke, L. T., Bianchi, D., & Menesini, E. (2020) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405629.2020.1782186 · Cited by 117
Cooperation in an asymmetric Volunteer's dilemma game theory and experimental evidence
Diekmann, A. (1993) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/bf01245571 · Cited by 117
Steffensmeier, D. J., & Terry, R. M. (1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012083170-8/50011-0 · Cited by 117
Gervais, W. M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613489836 · Cited by 127
“Classic research reveals, for example, that people are less likely to offer help when there are other potential helpers nearby (Darley & Latane, 1968) and tend to exert less individual effort when working on group tasks than when working alone (Ingrahm, Levinger, Graves, & Peckham, 1974; Jackson &…”
BackgroundPeng, L., Jia, S., Feng, T., Liu, Q., Suo, T., & Li, H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.275 · Cited by 119
“”(1) The diffusion of responsibility is a wellknown social phenomenon by which the sense of personal responsibility and individual accountability are sharply deemphasized when people work with others compared with when they work individually (Latane and Darley, 1968; Latane and Darley, 1969; Forsyth et al., 2002).”
Gunarathne, P., Rui, H., & Seidmann, A. A. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14290 · Cited by 121
“As noted above, social psychologists Darley and Latané (1968) proposed a diffusion of responsibility explanation for the bystander effect, asserting that individuals are less obligated to help in the presence of bystanders, as the responsibility to intervene is not directed to any one of the…”
BackgroundSyvertsen, A. K., Flanagan, C. A., & Stout, M. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013246 · Cited by 115
“Darley and Latané (1968), for instance, found that the bystander effect (i.e., seeing or knowing of an emergency and failing to respond) remained stable within groups of strangers but not within cohesive groups (Rutkowski, Gruder, & Romer, 1983).”
BackgroundDo your friends make you smarter?: An analysis of social strategies in online information seeking
Evans, B. M., Kairam, S., & Pirolli, P. L. T. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.12.001 · Cited by 114
“This combined social strategy may increase the likelihood of a relevant response by (1) reducing noise (well-matched targets will provide wellmatched answers) and (2) reducing the bystander effect ( Darley & Latane, 1968 ) (where people become less likely to help as more bystanders are present).”
BackgroundHuman Decision Making with Machine Assistance: An Experiment on Bailing and Jailing
Grgić-Hlača, N., Engel, C., & Gummadi, K. P. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359280 · Cited by 113
“Finally, the properties of the task affect advice taking through the risk [42, 71] and responsibility [7, 8, 21, 44, 71] associated with the decision making process and outcomes.”
BackgroundThe Disappearance of the Social in American Social Psychology
Greenwood, J. D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511512162 · Cited by 115
Small, D. A., & Cryder, C. E. (2016) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.001 · Cited by 125
Aiding Peace, Abetting Violence: Third Parties and the Management of Conflict
Phillips, S., & Cooney, M. (2005) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240507000207 · Cited by 113
Individual Orientations to Prosocial Behavior1
Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M., & Meter, K. (1972) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00035.x · Cited by 111
Masculinity inhibits helping in emergencies: Personality does predict the bystander effect.
Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.420 · Cited by 110
Cain, D. M., Dana, J. D., & Newman, G. E. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.911576 · Cited by 112
“Our review confirms that both direct requests, such as DellaVigna et al.’s (2012) charity solicitations, and indirect requests, such as economic games that “suggest” that altruism is appropriate, can powerfully influence behavior.”
BackgroundThe Bystander Effect: A Lens for Understanding Patterns of Participation
Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. S. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1302_2 · Cited by 117
“Through these and other studies (e.g., Darley & Latané, 1968; Latané & Darley, 1969), Latané and Darley (1970) built a model of the stages of decisions that must be made before bystanders will intervene in an emergency.”
MethodDiffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency.
Whyte, G. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.408 · Cited by 110
Espin, S. (2006) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.017475 · Cited by 110
Group induced shift toward risk: A critical appraisal.
Clark, R. D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031567 · Cited by 109
Prosocial Bystander Behavior in Bullying Dynamics: Assessing the Impact of Social Capital
Evans, C. B. R., & Smokowski, P. R. (2015) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0338-5 · Cited by 109
“Other situational factors such as victim appearance, severity of victim need, cost of helping, and the number of bystanders present also impact prosocial behavior (see Batson and Powell 2003 for a review; Darley and Latane 1968).”
Mainwaring, C., Gabbert, F., & Scott, A. J. (2022) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380221079660 · Cited by 109
“Despite the pervasive idea in the bystander literature that the presence of other bystanders inhibits bystander action through a diffusion of responsibility – the well-known ‘bystander effect’ (Darley & Latané, 1968) – this is not consistently supported by the literature.”
ResultMarket Design and Moral Behavior
Kirchler, M., Huber, J., Stefan, M., & Sutter, M. (2016) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2246 · Cited by 93
“This difference between regimes can likely be attributed to the diffusion of responsibility (Darley and Latane, 1968; Ciccarelli andWhite, 2009).”
BackgroundGeller, E. S. (2001) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1017/s0962-1849(02)01002-8 · Cited by 113
Sociology: A Lost Connection in Social Psychology
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Snyder, B. H. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309347835 · Cited by 114
“Most celebrated laboratory experiments in social psychology were produced around this period (e.g., Aronson & Mills, 1959; Darley & Latané, 1968; Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959; Milgram, 1963; Schachter & Singer, 1962), using a highly staged, emotion-provoking situation created in a research…”
MethodHall, D., Whyte, J. K., & Lessing, J. (2019) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2019.1656814 · Cited by 108
Mynatt, C. R., & Sherman, S. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1111 · Cited by 112
Social identity, group processes, and helping in emergencies
Levine, M., & Manning, R. (2013) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.892318 · Cited by 114
“…such as the presence or absence of others and the group size of bystanders, produced what came to be known as the “bystander effect”—the idea that individuals would be more likely to intervene when alone, than when in the presence of others (e.g., Darley & Latane, 1968; Latane & Darley, 1968).”
Background‘I Wasn't Alone’: Collective Behaviour and Violent Delinquency
McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2009) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1375/acri.42.3.336 · Cited by 105
“Indeed, in one of the first empirical investigations on the topic, Darley and Latane (1968) found that subjects were more prone to diffuse responsibility as the size of the group increased.”
BackgroundFreedom, Responsibility and the Challenge of Situationism
Nelkin, D. K. (2005) · Midwest Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2005.00112.x · Cited by 105
Bystander Intervention in Bullying: Role of Social Skills and Gender
Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2017) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431617735652 · Cited by 105
Wright, J. C., Warren, M. T., & Snow, N. E. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190655136.001.0001 · Cited by 109
Bystander reactions to a violent theft: Crime in Jerusalem.
Schwartz, S. H., & Gottlieb, A. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.6.1188 · Cited by 105
The Social Psychology of Small Groups: Cooperative and Mixed-Motive Interaction
Davis, J. H., Laughlin, P. R., & Komorita, S. S. (1976) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.27.020176.002441 · Cited by 104
Sargent, R. H., & Newman, L. S. (2021) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/1089268021995168 · Cited by 104
“When introducing pluralistic ignorance—frequently in the context of describing bystander nonintervention in emergency situations (Darley & Latane, 1968)—researchers and instructors often provide two prototypical examples: the classroom and alcohol examples.”
BackgroundThree dimensions of naturalness: An expanded definition of field research.
Tunnell, G. B. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.84.3.426 · Cited by 108
Landrum, R. E. (2005) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top3204_8 · Cited by 104
“Sources of Graphs Most Frequently Used in Introductory Psychology Textbooks Graph Frequency % Forgetting As a Function of Time (Ebbinghaus, 1885/1964) 22 76 Familial Relationships and Schizophrenia (Gottesman, 1991) 21 72 Latent Learning (Tolman & Honzik, 1930) 15 52 Sibling Relatedness and IQ Score (Bouchard, Lykken,…”
A child in distress: The influence of age and number of witnesses on children's attempts to help.
Staub, E. (1970) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0028752 · Cited by 104
OPTIMISM BIAS ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION: THE ROLE OF THE RANGE OF IMPACT OF PRECAUTIONS
Hatfield, J., & Job, R. F. S. (2001) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0190 · Cited by 103
The Involvement/Exclusion Paradox of Spontaneous Volunteering
Harris, M., Shaw, D., Scully, J. W., Smith, C., & Hieke, G. (2016) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764016654222 · Cited by 107
“It is also conceptually distinct from interventions by “bystanders” who respond to an immediate situation because they happen to be there and who are involved only briefly (Darley & Latane, 1968).”
BackgroundWine for the Table: Self-Construal, Group Size, and Choice for Self and Others
Wu, E. C., Moore, S. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy082 · Cited by 102
Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing.
Hans, V. P., & Ermann, M. D. (1989) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01055921 · Cited by 102
“Individual members of a group should benefit from diffusion of responsibility within the group ( Darley & Latane, 1968 ) and should receive fewer dispositional attributions (Wilder, 1987).”
BackgroundDwyer, P. C., Maki, A., & Rothman, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.002 · Cited by 100
“Although the hypothesized influence of descriptive norms provides a plausible account for the observed pattern of behavior, it could also reflect a sense of personal responsibility, which has been shown to influence other instances of prosocial behavior (Berkowitz, 1972; Darley & Latane, 1968).”
BackgroundWhat Drives Whom? A Cultural Perspective on Human Agency
Hernández, M., & Iyengar, S. S. (2001) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.19.3.269.21468 · Cited by 107
An Empirical Exploration Into the Measurement of Rape Culture
Johnson, N. L., & Johnson, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517732347 · Cited by 101
“A long history of research (e.g., Brown, Banyard, & Moynihan, 2014; Brown & Messman-Moore, 2010; Darley & Latane, 1968; Gidycz, Orchowski, & Berkowitz, 2011; Leone, Parrott, & Swartout, 2017) demonstrates individual endorsement of willingness to engage in bystander behavior; however, limited…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Darley, J. M., & Latane, B.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1968
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4, Pt.1
- Pages
- 377-383
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2171602877
- Semantic Scholar
- a17d8ee9f157ebeb2f520406c1d79346ceb532c8
- Cited by
- 3,083
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 175 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 138 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 113.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Keywords
- bystander intervention, diffusion of responsibility, emergency situations, helping behavior, personal responsibility, group size, gender differences, apathy, anomie, alienation
- MeSH terms
- Character, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Emergencies, Female, Group Processes, Group Structure, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Perception, Psychology, Social, Reaction Time, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review