Cited by 58Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Self-reported acceptance of social anxiety symptoms: Development and validation of the Social Anxiety—Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.

Open access
MacKenzie, Meagan B., Kocovski, Nancy L.·2010·International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized as a persistent fear of negative evaluation in social situations. This chronic condition is the fourth most common psychiatric disorder (Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, & Walters, 2005), and is most often treated using cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Although CBT has been widely demonstrated as efficacious for treating social anxiety, many individuals with social anxiety do not benefit from this treatment modality or only experience minimal improvement (Hofmann & Bogels, 2006). Therefore, clinicians and researchers have been drawn to other approaches to treatment, including mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions. Briefly, mindfulness can be described as intentional present moment awareness and a sense of nonjudgmental acceptance towards life's events (Kabat-Zinn, 1994). Mindfulness is a concept derived from eastern spiritual traditions, and has increasingly been incorporated by clinical researchers into interventions that are applied in medical and mental health settings. The acceptance component is of particular importance to the current study, and is often conceptualized along a continuum. The scope of acceptance ranges from experiential avoidance (or a lack of acceptance), where an individual is unwilling to remain in contact with internal experiences (such as thoughts and feelings), to acceptance, where an individual actively experiences his/her internal events (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999). Mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments, including acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT; Hayes et al., 1999), have emerged as efficacious for a wide spectrum of clinical disorders (Baer, 2003). ACT evolved from CBT and has retained some of its fundamentals, such as exposure (albeit following a different rationale), and builds upon them. Specifically, ACT aims to help clients increase acceptance of thoughts and feelings, choose valued directions for their lives, and commit to actions which are consistent with those values (Hayes et al., 1999). Within the ACT model, mindfulness and acceptance are related and distinct strategies used to increase psychological flexibility, or the ability to be aware of the present moment, in the pursuit of valued goals (Lillis, Hayes, Bunting, & Masuda, 2009). The goal of acceptance may be particularly significant for psychologists because disruptions in the acceptance component appear to be relevant in psychopathology (Hayes, Wilson, Gifford, Follette, & Stosahl, 1996). A growing body of research has provided evidence for the usefulness of mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions specifically in the context of social anxiety (Bogels, Sijbers, & Voncken, 2006; Dalrymple & Herbert, 2007; Herbert & Cardaciotto, 2005; Kocovski, Fleming, & Rector, 2009; Koszycki, Benger, Shlik, & Bradwejn, 2007; Ossman, Wilson, Storaasli, & McNeill, 2006). These findings in support of mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments for social anxiety are encouraging; however, further examinations of such interventions are necessary to build support for their use and also to address how these treatments work. Valid and reliable indices assessing mindfulness and/or acceptance are integral for understanding the mechanisms by which mindfulness and acceptance-based therapies result in beneficial changes. In recent years, a number of general self-report measures of mindfulness and acceptance have been developed and validated (Baer, Smith, & Allen, 2004; Brown & Ryan, 2003; Buchheld, Grossman, & Walach, 2001; Feldman, Hayes, Kumar, & Greeson, 2004). One such instrument is the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ; Hayes et al., 2004). The AAQ is a measure commonly used by ACT researchers to assess experiential avoidance, or a lack of acceptance of negative private events (e.g., thoughts, feelings, physical sensations). The AAQ has been validated across a wide variety of populations and shown to be relatively psychometrically sound, and several complaint-specific measures have been adapted from this scale. …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0100909

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacKenzie, M. B., & Kocovski, N. L.
Affiliations
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy
Published
2010
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
214-232
ISSN
1555-7855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051723857
Cited by
58
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, mindfulness, acceptance-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy, experiential avoidance, psychological flexibility, self-report questionnaire development, questionnaire validation, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment-resistant anxiety, acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review