Cited by 29Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and BehaviorsGender Roles and Identity Studies

Social networking sites and men’s drive for muscularity: Testing a revised objectification model.

Open access
Seekis, Veya, Bradley, Graham L., Duffy, Amanda L.·2021·Psychology of Men & Masculinities

Abstract

The contribution of social media to men’s drive for muscularity (DM) has received limited research attention. This study drew on a revised objectification theory to predict attitudes and behaviors pertaining to DM that arise from using social networking sites (SNSs). A sample of 303 undergraduate men, aged 17–25 years, completed online questionnaire measures of engagement in three SNS activities (browsing or following celebrity, fashion, and grooming sites, browsing or following fitspiration sites, and placing importance on online “likes” and comments). Also assessed were body surveillance, social appearance anxiety, and two indices of DM (attitudes and behavior). Structural equation modeling was used to test an objectification theory-based model of the antecedents of DM. Results supported a serial mediation process comprising paths from two of the SNS activities (browsing or following celebrity, fashion, and grooming sites and placing importance on online “likes” and comments) through, in turn, body surveillance and social appearance anxiety, to DM attitudes but not to DM behaviors. Viewing fitspiration sites predicted DM behaviors and attitudes directly, rather than indirectly. Findings extend objectification theory as a useful framework for identifying the influence of some SNS uses on young men’s DM and suggest strategies through which the negative effects of SNS use on excessive DM may be curtailed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/men0000265

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work has highlighted the need to further understand the pervasiveness of presentations of male lean and muscular appearance ideals on social media, and potential effects on internalization of the muscular ideal, appearance anxiety, and body dissatisfaction.

    “Recent work has highlighted the need to further understand the pervasiveness of presentations of male lean and muscular appearance ideals on SM (Gültzow et al., 2020), and potential effects on internalization of the muscular ideal, appearance anxiety, and body dissatisfaction (Fatt et al., 2019; Seekis et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Seekis, V., Bradley, G. L., & Duffy, A. L.
Venue
Psychology of Men & Masculinities
Published
2021-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
189-200
ISSN
  • 1524-9220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-151X
OpenAlex
W3016083948
Cited by
29
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology of Men & Masculinity (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
drive for muscularity, objectification theory, social networking sites, men's body image, body surveillance, social appearance anxiety, fitspiration, young men, serial mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review