Cited by 544Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

A Meta-analysis of Executive Components of Working Memory

Open access
Nee, Derek Evan, Brown, Joshua W., Askren, Mary K., Berman, Marc G., Demiralp, Emre, Krawitz, Adam, Jonides, John·2013·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Working memory (WM) enables the online maintenance and manipulation of information and is central to intelligent cognitive functioning. Much research has investigated executive processes of WM in order to understand the operations that make WM "work." However, there is yet little consensus regarding how executive processes of WM are organized. Here, we used quantitative meta-analysis to summarize data from 36 experiments that examined executive processes of WM. Experiments were categorized into 4 component functions central to WM: protecting WM from external distraction (distractor resistance), preventing irrelevant memories from intruding into WM (intrusion resistance), shifting attention within WM (shifting), and updating the contents of WM (updating). Data were also sorted by content (verbal, spatial, object). Meta-analytic results suggested that rather than dissociating into distinct functions, 2 separate frontal regions were recruited across diverse executive demands. One region was located dorsally in the caudal superior frontal sulcus and was especially sensitive to spatial content. The other was located laterally in the midlateral prefrontal cortex and showed sensitivity to nonspatial content. We propose that dorsal-"where"/ventral-"what" frameworks that have been applied to WM maintenance also apply to executive processes of WM. Hence, WM can largely be simplified to a dual selection model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhs007

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across meta-analyses using traditional neuropsychological executive function tests for children with ADHD, 33%-50% of cases exhibited executive function deficits, including 30%-37% with impaired working memory and 21%-46% with impaired inhibitory control.

    “across meta-analyses using traditional neuropsychological executive function tests for children with ADHD, 33%-50% of cases exhibited executive function deficits (30%-37% impaired working memory, 21%-46% impaired inhibitory control).90,144–149”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [149]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Conjunction maps of activation during different tasks suggest that both children and adults recruit a common set of regions within the FPN and CON during diverse EF tasks.

    “Conjunction maps of activation during different tasks (e.g., during inhibiting, updating, and shifting tasks), either with data estimated within one study [135, 138, 139] or with meta-analytic techniques [137, 140, 141], suggest that both children and adults recruit a common set of regions within the FPN and CON during diverse EF tasks.”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [141]

    The ALE Analyses by Function report overlapping activations across several working-memory executive tasks, including shifting and updating. However, Experiment Selection restricts the included studies to healthy young adults, so this paper does not support the claim about children. It also does not establish a common set of regions specifically within both the FPN and CON across these tasks. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Working memory is not a unitary construct.

    “working memory is not a unitary construct (Nee et al., 2013; Wager & Smith, 2003)”
  • Nee et al. (2013) reported widespread bilateral fronto-parietal network activation during various types of working memory tasks.

    “Nee et al. (2013) reported that there was widespread bilateral fronto-parietal network activation during various types of working memory tasks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nee, D. E., Brown, J. W., Askren, M. K., Berman, M. G., Demiralp, E., Krawitz, A., & Jonides, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Rotman Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
264-282
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2157840419
Cited by
544
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0822748)
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (D10PC20023)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-60655, R01MH060655)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA026457, R03DA023462)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory, executive function, intrusion resistance, attentional shift, working memory updating, spatial working memory, verbal working memory, object working memory
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Memory, Short-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review