Cited by 221Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Believing what we do not believe: acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions

Risen, Jane L.·2016·Psychological Review

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Traditionally, research on superstition and magical thinking has focused on people's cognitive shortcomings, but superstitions are not limited to individuals with mental deficits. Even smart, educated, emotionally stable adults have superstitions that are not rational. Dual process models--such as the corrective model advocated by Kahneman and Frederick (2002, 2005), which suggests that System 1 generates intuitive answers that may or may not be corrected by System 2--are useful for illustrating why superstitious thinking is widespread, why particular beliefs arise, and why they are maintained even though they are not true. However, to understand why superstitious beliefs are maintained even when people know they are not true requires that the model be refined. It must allow for the possibility that people can recognize--in the moment--that their belief does not make sense, but act on it nevertheless. People can detect an error, but choose not to correct it, a process I refer to as acquiescence. The first part of the article will use a dual process model to understand the psychology underlying magical thinking, highlighting features of System 1 that generate magical intuitions and features of the person or situation that prompt System 2 to correct them. The second part of the article will suggest that we can improve the model by decoupling the detection of errors from their correction and recognizing acquiescence as a possible System 2 response. I suggest that refining the theory will prove useful for understanding phenomena outside of the context of magical thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rev0000017

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Untitled work
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Bad Is Stronger Than Good
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202 · cited 1×
“The psychology underlying these magical intuitions is explained by people substituting a simpler similarity computation for a much more difficult assessment of causality (Kahneman & Tversky, 1973).”
Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 165 references

Sorted by citations

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620939054 · Cited by 1,715
Human- versus Artificial Intelligence
Korteling, J. E. (., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A. M., Boonekamp, R. C., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.622364 · Cited by 619
“These tendencies are largely implicit and unconscious and feel quite naturally and self/evident when we are aware of these cognitive inclinations (Pronin et al., 2002; Risen, 2015; Korteling et al., 2018b).”
Background
Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uhbk9 · Cited by 390
Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware
Stanovich, K. E. (2018) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314 · Cited by 279
Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework
van Elk, M., & Aleman, A. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.031 · Cited by 191
Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases
Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221148147 · Cited by 200
A Neural Network Framework for Cognitive Bias
Korteling, J. E., Brouwer, A.-M., & Toet, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01561 · Cited by 158
On Dual- and Single-Process Models of Thinking
Neys, W. D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620964172 · Cited by 142
Seeking the supernatural: the Interactive Religious Experience Model
Leeuwen, N. V., & van Elk, M. (2018) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2018.1453529 · Cited by 99
Belief formation – A driving force for brain evolution
Seitz, R. J., & Angel, H. (2020) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105548 · Cited by 100
Supernatural norm enforcement: Thinking about karma and God reduces selfishness among believers
White, C., Kelly, J., Shariff, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.008 · Cited by 92
Cognitive Biases
(Hans) Korteling, J. E., & Toet, A. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.24105-9 · Cited by 65
The Cultural Evolution of Epistemic Practices: The Case of Divination
Hong, Z., & Henrich, J. (2021) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-021-09408-6 · Cited by 64
Take It or Leave It: How Choosing versus Rejecting Alternatives Affects Information Processing
Sokolova, T., & Krishna, A. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw049 · Cited by 52
Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: the role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases
Šrol, J. (2021) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2021.1938220 · Cited by 71
Viruses, vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and improving risky decision-making.
Reyna, V. F., Broniatowski, D. A., & Edelson, S. M. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004 · Cited by 59
Breaking magic: Foreign language suppresses superstition
Hadjichristidis, C., Geipel, J., & Surian, L. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1371780 · Cited by 55
Retention and Transfer of Cognitive Bias Mitigation Interventions: A Systematic Literature Study
Korteling, J. E., Gerritsma, J. Y. J., & Toet, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629354 · Cited by 58
Enabling a learning healthcare system with automated computer protocols that produce replicable and personalized clinician actions
Morris, A. H., Stagg, B. C., Lanspa, M. J., Orme, J. F., Clemmer, T. P., Weaver, L. K., Thomas, F., Grissom, C. K., Hirshberg, E. L., East, T. D., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa294 · Cited by 42
The Motivational Underpinnings of Belief in God
Laurin, K., & Kay, A. C. (2017) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.004 · Cited by 38
The formation and revision of intuitions
Meyer, A., & Frederick, S. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105380 · Cited by 38
People recognize and condone their own morally motivated reasoning
Cusimano, C., & Lombrozo, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105379 · Cited by 37
Does Choice Cause an Illusion of Control?
Klusowski, J., Small, D. A., & Simmons, J. P. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620958009 · Cited by 41
Cognitive Predictors of Precautionary Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Thoma, V., Weiss‐Cohen, L., Filkuková, P., & Ayton, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589800 · Cited by 38
Leadership and the Logic of Absurdity
Newark, D. A. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0186 · Cited by 38
Arbitrary Rituals Mute the Neural Response to Performance Failure
Hobson, N. M., Bonk, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3363 · Cited by 37
Willingness to transmit and the spread of pseudoscientific beliefs
Mercier, H., Majima, Y., & Miton, H. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3413 · Cited by 31
The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition
Walco, D. K., & Risen, J. L. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617723377 · Cited by 32
Dream Interpretation from a Cognitive and Cultural Evolutionary Perspective: The Case of Oneiromancy in Traditional China
Hong, Z. (2022) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13088 · Cited by 34
Shooting the messenger.
John, L. K., Blunden, H., & Liu, H. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000586 · Cited by 32
Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking-Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs
Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., & Browne, M. (2020) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-019-09927-z · Cited by 33
Examining the roles of intuition and gender in magical beliefs
Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103956 · Cited by 36
Do superstitious beliefs affect influenza vaccine uptake through shaping health beliefs?
Lu, J., Luo, M., Yee, A. Z. H., Sheldenkar, A., Lau, J., & Lwin, M. O. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.017 · Cited by 28
Beyond the Surface: A New Perspective on Dual-System Theories in Decision-Making
Hochman, G. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14111028 · Cited by 38
A cognitive category-learning model of rule abstraction, attention learning, and contextual modulation.
Schlegelmilch, R., Wills, A. J., & von Helversen, B. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000321 · Cited by 26
Superstitious Confabulations
Ichino, A. (2018) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-018-9620-y · Cited by 26
Culture as a Moderator of Epistemically Suspect Beliefs
Majima, Y., Walker, A. C., Turpin, M., & Fugelsang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745580 · Cited by 15
Individual differences in paranormal beliefs: The differential role of personality aspects
Chauvin, B., & Mullet, É. (2018) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0047-9 · Cited by 22
Superstition and stock price crash risk
Bai, M., Xu, L., Yu, C., & Zurbruegg, R. (2020) · Pacific-Basin Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101287 · Cited by 18
The Role of Intuition in Evaluative Judgment and Decision
Hurteau, M., Rahmanian, J., Houle, S., & Marchand, M.-P. (2020) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214020908211 · Cited by 24
Seeking blessings by doing good: Top executive superstitions and corporate philanthropy
Cai, X., Liao, L., Pan, Y., & Wang, K. T. (2025) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102775 · Cited by 20
Second-guess: Testing the specificity of error detection in the bat-and-ball problem
Bagó, B., Raoelison, M., & Neys, W. D. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.008 · Cited by 20
Encouraging Gamblers to Think Critically Using Generalised Analytical Priming is Ineffective at Reducing Gambling Biases
Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2019) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-019-09910-8 · Cited by 20
Plausibility matters: A challenge to Gilbert's “Spinozan” account of belief formation
Vorms, M., Harris, A. J. L., Topf, S., & Hahn, U. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104990 · Cited by 19
Unsticking the rationality stalemate: Motivated reasoning, reality, and irrationality
Kurdoglu, R. S., Lerner, D., & Ateş, N. Y. (2022) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00336 · Cited by 20
The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs
van Elk, M. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.001 · Cited by 19
Numerical Nudging: Using an Accelerating Score to Enhance Performance
Shen, L., & Hsee, C. K. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617700497 · Cited by 19
Does training analytical thinking decrease superstitious beliefs? Relationship between analytical thinking, intrinsic religiosity, and superstitious beliefs
Tosyalı, F., & Aktas, B. E. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111122 · Cited by 21
Beliefs in inevitable justice curb revenge behaviours: Cultural perspectives on karma
Goyal, N., & Miller, J. G. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2933 · Cited by 18
Superstitious beliefs and the associative mind
Daprati, E., Sirigu, A., Desmurget, M., & Nico, D. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102822 · Cited by 20
Religious belief and cognitive conflict sensitivity: A preregistered fMRI study
Hoogeveen, S., Snoek, L., & van Elk, M. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.011 · Cited by 19
Why do slot machine gamblers use stopping devices? Findings from a ‘Casino Lab’ experiment
Chu, S., Limbrick‐Oldfield, E. H., Murch, W. S., & Clark, L. (2017) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2017.1413125 · Cited by 16
The role of cognitive biases in shaping irrational beliefs: a multi-Study Investigation
Teovanović, P., Purić, D., Živanović, M. M., Lukić, P., Branković, M., Stanković, S., Knežević, G., Lazarević, B., & Žeželj, I. (2024) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2024.2421367 · Cited by 18
Overlapping Mental Magisteria: Implications of Experimental Psychology for a Theory of Religious Belief as Misattribution
Galen, L. W. (2017) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/15700682-12341393 · Cited by 15
Similarity as a Double-Edged Sword: The Positive and Negative Effects of Showcasing Similar Previous Winners on Perceived Likelihood of Winning in Sweepstakes
Laporte, S., & Briers, B. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy041 · Cited by 15
Introducing conspiracy intuitions to better understand conspiracy beliefs.
Roberts, R., & Risen, J. L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101395 · Cited by 15
Magic Performances – When Explained in Psychic Terms by University Students
Lesaffre, L., Kuhn, G., Abu-Akel, A. M., Rochat, D., & Möhr, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02129 · Cited by 15
“Dysrationalia” among university students: The role of cognitive abilities, different aspects of rational thought and self-control in explaining epistemically suspect beliefs
Erceg, N., Galić, Z., & Bubić, A. (2019) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1696 · Cited by 15
Defining deliberation for dual-process models of reasoning
Neys, W. D. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00466-6 · Cited by 14
“The Secret” to Success? The Psychology of Belief in Manifestation
Dixon, L. J., Hornsey, M. J., & Hartley, N. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231181162 · Cited by 14
Development and validation of the Protective Gambling Beliefs Scale (PGBS)
Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2018) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2018.1500624 · Cited by 14
The Superstitious Heuristic in Strategic Decision Making
Liu, J., Tsang, E. W. K., & Shi, W. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063231198191 · Cited by 16
Superstition, Ethics, and Transformative Consumer Research
Vyse, S. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/698869 · Cited by 13
Tra i Leoni: Revealing the preferences behind a superstition
Invernizzi, G. M., Miller, J. B., Coen, T., Dufwenberg, M. A., & Oliveira, L. E. R. (2020) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2020.102324 · Cited by 13
On the Adaptive Value of Paranormal Beliefs - a Qualitative Study
Betsch, T., Jäckel, P., Hammes, M., & Brinkmann, B. J. (2021) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-020-09594-5 · Cited by 13
Task‐related neural mechanisms of persecutory ideation in schizophrenia and community monozygotic twin‐pairs
Wisner, K., Johnson, M. K., Porter, J. N., Krueger, R. F., & MacDonald, A. W. (2021) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25613 · Cited by 12
The best option illusion in self and social assessment
Dunning, D. A. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1465460 · Cited by 14
“God Spoke to Me”: Subjective Paranormal Experience and the Homeostatic Response to Early Trauma
Marks, D. F. (2020) · Imagination Cognition and Personality · doi:10.1177/0276236620934003 · Cited by 12
Gender role orientation, thinking style preference and facets of adult paranormality: A mediation analysis
Rogers, P., Hattersley, M., & French, C. C. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102821 · Cited by 16
Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns
Kurdoglu, R. S., & Ateş, N. Y. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04659-2 · Cited by 15
Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement
Jin, Y., Jensen, G., Gottlieb, J. P., & Ferrera, V. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2202789119 · Cited by 12
The myth of regaining control: Ostracism increases superstitious tendencies
Poon, K., Wong, N. H., Lai, H., & Jiang, Y. (2022) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12606 · Cited by 12
In God We Trust: Effects of spirituality and religion on economic decision making
Rosmarin, D. H., Chowdhury, A., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Sacchet, M. D. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112350 · Cited by 15
People Are More Moral in Uncertain Environments
Chen, Y., & Zhong, S. (2025) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta20574 · Cited by 11
The Flushtration Count Illusion: Attribute substitution tricks our interpretation of a simple visual event sequence
Thomas, C., Didierjean, A., & Kuhn, G. (2018) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12306 · Cited by 11
Analytic Thinking and Political Orientation in the Corona Crisis
Maglić, M., Pavlovic, T. M., & Franc, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631800 · Cited by 10
A Bayesian perspective on delusions: Suggestions for modifying two reasoning tasks
Pfuhl, G. (2016) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.006 · Cited by 10
Group differences in Internet superstition: Negative relationship with neuroticism
Liu, J., Li, S., Li, B., & Luo, J. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111089 · Cited by 13
Conflict between Science and Superstition in Medical Practices
Uwayezu, D., Ntigura, E., Gatarayiha, A., Erem, A. S., Haque, M., Majumder, M. A. A., & Razzaque, M. S. (2022) · International Medical Education · doi:10.3390/ime1020007 · Cited by 10
Sudden-death aversion: Avoiding superior options because they feel riskier.
Walker, J., Risen, J. L., Gilovich, T. D., & Thaler, R. H. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000106 · Cited by 10
Paradoxical Knowing
Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2019) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000368 · Cited by 10
Modeling Cultural Transmission of Rituals in Silico: The Advantages and Pitfalls of Agent-Based vs. System Dynamics Models
Kaše, V., Hampejs, T., & Pospı́šil, Z. (2018) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340041 · Cited by 10
Business norm versus norm-nudge as a contract-enforcing mechanism: Evidence from a real marketplace
Bhattacharya, H., & Dugar, S. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104078 · Cited by 10
Can the experimental study of religion be advanced using a Bayesian predictive framework?
van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2016.1249915 · Cited by 10
Evolved priors for agent detection
Maij, D. L. R., & van Elk, M. (2017) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2017.1387591 · Cited by 10
Numerological superstitions and market-wide herding: Evidence from China
Cui, Y., Gavriilidis, K., Gębka, B., & Kallinterakis, V. (2024) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103199 · Cited by 9
Good fortune and its influence on B2B relationships: The case of the Mae Manee money solution campaign in Thailand
Chandrasapth, K., Yannopoulou, N., & Bian, X. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.12.005 · Cited by 9
Acquiescing to intuition: Believing what we know isn't so
Risen, J. L. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12358 · Cited by 12
A Functional Motivation Framework for Examining Superstitious Behavior
Vaidyanathan, R., Aggarwal, P., & Bakpayev, M. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/698492 · Cited by 9
When do keepsakes keep us together? The effect of separation from a partner on directing attachment to inanimate objects
Niemyjska, A. (2019) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12274 · Cited by 9
Karmic forecasts: The role of justice in forecasts about self and others.
Mata, A., & Simão, C. (2019) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000162 · Cited by 9
Eristic reasoning: Adaptation to extreme uncertainty
Kurdoglu, R. S., Jekel, M., & Ateş, N. Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1004031 · Cited by 12
A Quantitative Examination of Half-Belief in Superstition
Caspi, A., Shmuel, E., & Chajut, E. (2023) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000401 · Cited by 8
Magical thinking and superstitious beliefs in Iranian culture
Afhami, R., Danesh, N., & Mohammadi-Zarghan, S. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00026-4 · Cited by 8
The Effect of Superstition on Health: Evidence from the Taiwanese Ghost Month
Halla, M., Liu, C., & Liu, J. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25474 · Cited by 8
Stressful Life Events and Problem Gambling Among Chinese Lottery Gamblers: The Mediating Effects of Coping Strategies and Magical Thinking
Jin, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, B., Wang, J., & Tian, Y. (2023) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-023-10270-7 · Cited by 7
“When something like a ladybug lands on you”: Origins and development of the concept of luck.
Woolley, J. D., & Kelley, K. A. (2020) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001104 · Cited by 7
Simultaneous Preferences for Hedging and Doubling Down: Focal Prospects, Background Positions, and Nonconsequentialist Conceptualizations of Uncertainty
Markle, A. B., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2918 · Cited by 7
A neural network framework for cognitive biasPreprint
Korteling, J. E., Brouwer, A.-M., & Toet, A. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qsy98 · Cited by 9
Wraths of Fire
Kohonen, S. (2020) · Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion · doi:10.1558/jcsr.41026 · Cited by 6

Authors: Risen, J. L.
Affiliations: University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author: Risen, Jane L.
ORCID: Risen, Jane L.
Venue: Psychological Review
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 2016-03
Volume: 123
Issue: 2
Pages: 182-207
ISSN: 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
1939-1471
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000017
OpenAlex: W1774007993
Cited by: 221
References: 165
Citations by year: 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 6
FWCI: 27.81
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: superstition, magical thinking, acquiescence, dual-process models, System 1, System 2, intuitive thinking, error detection, belief maintenance, cognitive biases
MeSH terms: Humans, Magic, Models, Psychological, Superstitions, Thinking, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Believing what we do not believe: acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks