Cited by 221Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Believing what we do not believe: acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions

Risen, Jane L.·2016·Psychological Review

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Traditionally, research on superstition and magical thinking has focused on people's cognitive shortcomings, but superstitions are not limited to individuals with mental deficits. Even smart, educated, emotionally stable adults have superstitions that are not rational. Dual process models--such as the corrective model advocated by Kahneman and Frederick (2002, 2005), which suggests that System 1 generates intuitive answers that may or may not be corrected by System 2--are useful for illustrating why superstitious thinking is widespread, why particular beliefs arise, and why they are maintained even though they are not true. However, to understand why superstitious beliefs are maintained even when people know they are not true requires that the model be refined. It must allow for the possibility that people can recognize--in the moment--that their belief does not make sense, but act on it nevertheless. People can detect an error, but choose not to correct it, a process I refer to as acquiescence. The first part of the article will use a dual process model to understand the psychology underlying magical thinking, highlighting features of System 1 that generate magical intuitions and features of the person or situation that prompt System 2 to correct them. The second part of the article will suggest that we can improve the model by decoupling the detection of errors from their correction and recognizing acquiescence as a possible System 2 response. I suggest that refining the theory will prove useful for understanding phenomena outside of the context of magical thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rev0000017

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Untitled work
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Bad Is Stronger Than Good
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202 · cited 1×
“The psychology underlying these magical intuitions is explained by people substituting a simpler similarity computation for a much more difficult assessment of causality (Kahneman & Tversky, 1973).”
Background
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
Marquart, F., & Naderer, B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20 · Cited by 5,011
Unrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2 · Cited by 4,342
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 · Cited by 4,271
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
The illusion of control.
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60317-2 · Cited by 3,367
A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.3 · Cited by 2,931
The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 · Cited by 2,913
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · Cited by 2,620
Accounting for the effects of accountability.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 · Cited by 2,383
How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.
Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.4.684 · Cited by 2,190
A model of dual attitudes.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101 · Cited by 2,112
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_01 · Cited by 1,776
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441 · Cited by 1,692
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · Cited by 1,649
The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.
Bargh, J. A. (1994) · Cited by 1,587
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
Camerer, C. F., Hogarth, R. M., Budescu, D. V., & Eckel, C. C. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_2 · Cited by 1,545
Judged frequency of lethal events.
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551 · Cited by 1,539
Automaticity: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.
Moors, A., & Houwer, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297 · Cited by 1,535
How mental systems believe.
Gilbert, D. T. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.2.107 · Cited by 1,526
Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x · Cited by 1,487
'Superstition' in the pigeon
Skinner, B. F. (1948) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055873 · Cited by 1,456
Social perception and phenomenal causality.
Heider, F. (1944) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0055425 · Cited by 1,346
The Perception of Causality
Michotte, A. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315519050 · Cited by 1,323
Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking
Kahneman, D. J., & Lovallo, D. P. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475.023 · Cited by 1,304
Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty
Cosmides, L. (1996) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8 · Cited by 1,293
The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.
Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. J. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972 · Cited by 1,258
Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains.
Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. J. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.703 · Cited by 1,216
New Horizons in Psychology 1
Foss, B. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,157
Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy.
Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.51.2.215 · Cited by 1,155
Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159845 · Cited by 1,119
Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D. W., & Ross, M. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366 · Cited by 1,105
On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733 · Cited by 1,088
Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question.
Thompson, S. C. G. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89 · Cited by 1,083
Motivated inference: Self‐serving generation and evaluation of causal theories
Kunda, Z. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636 · Cited by 1,059
Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays.
Rawls, J., Malinowski, B., & Redfield, R. R. (1948) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2181808 · Cited by 1,034
How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
Gilovich, T. D. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,005
Moral tribes: emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-4949 · Cited by 978
Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1202 · Cited by 937
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569 · Cited by 844
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342 · Cited by 767
On the study of statistical intuitions
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90022-1 · Cited by 728
Intuition, reason, and metacognition
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001 · Cited by 709
Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00760.x · Cited by 703
Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory
Cooper, J. (2007) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446214282 · Cited by 700
The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193858 · Cited by 682
Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice
Shafir, E. B., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90015-t · Cited by 660
Alief and Belief
Gendler, T. S. (2008) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.5840/jphil20081051025 · Cited by 621
Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment.
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. J. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819 · Cited by 620
Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk.
Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.710 · Cited by 611
Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment.
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. J. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.819 · Cited by 593
Separating Multiple Processes in Implicit Social Cognition: The Quad Model of Implicit Task Performance.
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469 · Cited by 560
Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects
Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813 · Cited by 547
A model of heuristic judgment
Kahneman, D. J., & Frederick, S. (2005) · Cited by 497
Associative processes in intuitive judgment
Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004 · Cited by 492
The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60017-9 · Cited by 471
Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon.
Gur, R. C., & Sackeïm, H. A. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.147 · Cited by 429
Bias and Conflict
Neys, W. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611429354 · Cited by 418
Two Systems of Reasoning
Sloman, S. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.024 · Cited by 412
Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains
Greene, J. D. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 · Cited by 394
The laws of sympathetic magic
Rozin, P. N., & Nemeroff, C. J. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173728.006 · Cited by 386
Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition
Vyse, S. (1999) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e412892005-003 · Cited by 377
Why are Gambling Markets Organised so Differently from Financial Markets?
Levitt, S. D. (2004) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00207.x · Cited by 377
How natives think
Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1926) · Cited by 365
Moral dumbfounding: when intuition finds no reason
Björklund, F., Haidt, J., & Murphy, S. (2000) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 334
Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Epstein, S. J. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.63.4.534 · Cited by 334
The Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations Across Cultures and Development
Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., & Harris, P. L. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x · Cited by 332
Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods.
Windschitl, P. D., & Wells, G. L. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.2.4.343 · Cited by 326
Likeness and Likelihood in Everyday Thought: Magical Thinking in Judgments About Personality [and Comments and Reply]
Shweder, R. A., Casagrande, J. B., Fiske, D. W., Greenstone, J. D., Heelas, P., & Lancy, D. F. (1977) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/201974 · Cited by 320
When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors
Nicholas Epley, A., & Gilovich, T. D. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.495 · Cited by 302
Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles
Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.009 · Cited by 279
Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective
Thompson, V. A. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008 · Cited by 274
Keep Your Fingers Crossed!: How Superstition Improves Performance
Damisch, L., Stoberock, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610372631 · Cited by 251
Deep thoughts and shallow frames: on the susceptibility to framing effects
LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. B. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.433 · Cited by 242
Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications
Neys, W. D. (2013) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.854725 · Cited by 242
Craps and Magic
Henslin, J. M. (1967) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/224479 · Cited by 237
Effects of stress and tolerance of ambiguity on magical thinking.
Keinan, G. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.48 · Cited by 237
Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the was on Selection Task
Dawson, E. C., Gilovich, T. D., & Regan, D. T. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702236869 · Cited by 235
Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives.
Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.409 · Cited by 228
Rituals alleviate grieving for loved ones, lovers, and lotteries.
Norton, M. I., & Gino, F. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0031772 · Cited by 221
The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., Pennycook, G., Ball, L. J., Brack, H., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012 · Cited by 218
Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools
Neys, W. D., Rossi, S., & Houdé, O. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0384-5 · Cited by 200
Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.
Lieberman, M. D. (2003) · Cited by 200
The psychology of superstition
Jahoda, G. (1969) · Cited by 193
Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments.
Krosnick, J. A., Li, F., & Lehman, D. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1140 · Cited by 192
Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence.
Pronin, E., Wegner, D. M., McCarthy, K., & Rodríguez, S. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.218 · Cited by 185
Conscious and Nonconscious Components of Superstitious Beliefs in Judgment and Decision Making
Krämer, T., & Block, L. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/523288 · Cited by 178
People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
Inbar, Y., Cone, J., & Gilovich, T. D. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020215 · Cited by 165
Cultural Superstitions and the Price Endings Used in Chinese Advertising
Simmons, L. C., & Schindler, R. M. (2003) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jimk.11.2.101.20161 · Cited by 151
What's in a Term? Paranormal, Superstitious, Magical and Supernatural Beliefs by Any Other Name Would Mean the Same
Lindeman, M., & Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M. (2012) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027158 · Cited by 147
The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions
Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2012) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02118.x · Cited by 146
Intuitive Biases in Choice versus Estimation: Implications for the Wisdom of Crowds
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., Galak, J., & Frederick, S. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/658070 · Cited by 145
Healthier by Precommitment
Schwartz, J. A., Daniel Mochon, B., Wyper, L., Maroba, J., Patel, D. N., & Dan Ariely, C. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613510950 · Cited by 141
Factors Affecting Extraordinary Belief
Otis, L. P., & Alcock, J. E. (1982) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1982.9924420 · Cited by 139
EXPERIMENTAL CONTROL OF SUPERSTITIOUS RESPONDING IN HUMANS 1
Catania, A. C., & Cutts, D. (1963) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-203 · Cited by 139
Paranormal beliefs: their dimensionality and correlates
Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2006) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.608 · Cited by 138
Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.
Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.293 · Cited by 138
The voodoo doll task: Introducing and validating a novel method for studying aggressive inclinations
DeWall, C. N., Finkel, E. J., Lambert, N. M., Slotter, E. B., Bodenhausen, G. V., Pond, R. S., Renzetti, C. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2013) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21496 · Cited by 134
Visceral fit: While in a visceral state, associated states of the world seem more likely.
Risen, J. L., & Critcher, C. R. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022460 · Cited by 131
Religion and Paranormal Belief
Orenstein, A. (2002) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00118 · Cited by 127
The effect of superstitious beliefs on performance expectations
Block, L., & Krämer, T. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0116-y · Cited by 125
Superstition and Economic Threat: Germany, 1918-1940
Padgett, V. R., & Jorgenson, D. O. (1982) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167282084021 · Cited by 125
SUPERSTITIOUS BEHAVIOR IN HUMANS
Ono, K. (1987) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1987.47-261 · Cited by 122
Counterfactual Thought, Regret, and Superstition: How to Avoid Kicking Yourself
Miller, D. T., & Taylor, B. R. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.023 · Cited by 120
Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004 · Cited by 115
Superstitious behavior in sport: Levels of effectiveness and determinants of use in three collegiate sports.
Bleak, J. L., & Frederick, C. M. (1998) · Journal of sport behavior · Cited by 113
Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal
Musch, J., & Ehrenberg, K. (2002) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712602162517 · Cited by 113
Counterfactual Thinking and the First Instinct Fallacy.
Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., & Miller, D. T. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.725 · Cited by 110
TARGET ARTICLE: On Building a Better Process Model: It's Not Only How Many, but Which Ones and By Which Means?
Sherman, J. W. (2006) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1703_3 · Cited by 109
Disfluent fonts don’t help people solve math problems.
Meyer, A., Frederick, S., Burnham, T. C., Pinto, J. D. G., Boyer, T. W., Ball, L. J., Pennycook, G., Ackerman, R., Thompson, V. A., & Schuldt, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000049 · Cited by 109
Ghosts, UFOs, and magic: Positive affect and the experiential system.
King, L. A., Burton, C. M., Hicks, J. A., & Drigotas, S. M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.905 · Cited by 99
The dilution effect: judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both?
Tetlock, P. E., Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199611)26:6 · Cited by 97
Nonconscious effects of peculiar beliefs on consumer psychology and choice
Krämer, T., & Block, L. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.09.009 · Cited by 96
Investing in Karma
Converse, B. A., Risen, J. L., & Carter, T. J. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612437248 · Cited by 91
Another look at why people are reluctant to exchange lottery tickets.
Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. D. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.12 · Cited by 90
The illusion of control, superstitious belief, and optimism
Rudski, J. (2004) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-004-1036-8 · Cited by 85
Spontaneous causal inferences
Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00016-1 · Cited by 84
Half-Belief and the Paradox of Ritual Instrumental Activism: A Theory of Modern Superstition
Campbell, C. (1996) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591121 · Cited by 81
Friday the Thirteenth: ‘Part VII’—A Note
Kolb, R. W., & RODRIGUEZ, R. J. (1987) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04373.x · Cited by 77
Causal explanations of events by children and adults: Can alternative causal modes coexist in one mind?
Subbotsky, E. V. (2001) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151001165949 · Cited by 74
Religious People and Paranormal Believers
Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2007) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1 · Cited by 71
Two minds rationality
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2013) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.845605 · Cited by 60
Two systems of reasoning: An update.
Sloman, S. A. (2014) · Cited by 55
Magical Contagion and Aids Risk Perception in a College Population
Nemeroff, C. J., Brinkman, A., & Woodward, C. K. (1994) · AIDS Education and Prevention · doi:10.1521/aeap.1994.6.3.249 · Cited by 55
Like Mike: Ability contagion through touched objects increases confidence and improves performance
Krämer, T., & Block, L. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.009 · Cited by 53
“Superstitious” Behavior in Children
Wagner, G. A., & Morris, E. K. (1987) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03394994 · Cited by 53
Like Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs
Gilovich, T. D., & Savitsky, K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.036 · Cited by 50
One-Shot Illusory Correlations and Stereotype Formation
Risen, J. L., Gilovich, T. D., & Dunning, D. A. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207305862 · Cited by 49
Insurance, Risk, and Magical Thinking
Tykocinski, O. E. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208320556 · Cited by 48
Methodological and theoretical improvements in the study of superstitious beliefs and behaviour
Fluke, S. M., Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2012) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12008 · Cited by 44
Modern Magic: The Case of Examinations
Albas, D. C., & Albas, C. (1989) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01537.x · Cited by 40
The effect of non-contingent negative and positive reinforcement operations on the acquisition of superstitious behaviors
Aeschleman, S. R., Rosen, C. C., & Williams, M. R. (2003) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00158-4 · Cited by 39
Cognitive Psychology of Moral Intuitions
Kahneman, D. J., & Sunstein, C. R. (2005) · Research and perspectives in neurosciences · doi:10.1007/3-540-29803-7_8 · Cited by 37
“Head versus heart”: Effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns
Rozin, P. N., Grant, H., Weinberg, S., & Parker, S. (2007) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000541 · Cited by 30
‘Protective donation’
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.006 · Cited by 27
Avoiding greedy behavior in situations of uncertainty: The role of magical thinking
Arad, A. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2014.07.003 · Cited by 25
Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect
van Wolferen, J., Inbar, Y., & Zeelenberg, M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004496 · Cited by 21
Magic and Rationality Again
Jarvie, I. C., & Agassi, J. (1987) · Nijhoff international philosophy series · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3491-7_25 · Cited by 18
Superstitions Among Certain Groups of Lebanese Arab Students in Beirut
Za'rour, G. I. (1972) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/002202217200300305 · Cited by 18
Chinese superstition in US commodity trading
Chung, R., Darrat, A. F., & Li, B. (2013) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/13504851.2013.848012 · Cited by 16
Intelligence, Belief in the Paranormal, Knowledge of Probability and Aging
Stuart‐Hamilton, I., Nayak, L., & Priest, L. (2006) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601270500476847 · Cited by 13
The insurance effect: How the possession of gas masks reduces the likelihood of a missile attack
Tykocinski, O. E. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000509x · Cited by 11
Avoiding Information to Protect a Strong Intuitive Preference
Woolley, K., & Risen, J. L. (2017) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 1

Flagged first, then by citations

Sorted by citations

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620939054 · Cited by 1,715
Human- versus Artificial Intelligence
Korteling, J. E. (., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A. M., Boonekamp, R. C., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.622364 · Cited by 619
“These tendencies are largely implicit and unconscious and feel quite naturally and self/evident when we are aware of these cognitive inclinations (Pronin et al., 2002; Risen, 2015; Korteling et al., 2018b).”
Background
Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uhbk9 · Cited by 390
Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware
Stanovich, K. E. (2018) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314 · Cited by 279
Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework
van Elk, M., & Aleman, A. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.031 · Cited by 191

See all 221

Authors: Risen, J. L.
Affiliations: University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author: Risen, Jane L.
ORCID: Risen, Jane L.
Venue: Psychological Review
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 2016-03
Volume: 123
Issue: 2
Pages: 182-207
ISSN: 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
1939-1471
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000017
OpenAlex: W1774007993
Cited by: 221
References: 165
Citations by year: 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 6
FWCI: 27.81
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: superstition, magical thinking, acquiescence, dual-process models, System 1, System 2, intuitive thinking, error detection, belief maintenance, cognitive biases
MeSH terms: Humans, Magic, Models, Psychological, Superstitions, Thinking, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Believing what we do not believe: acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks