Cited by 594Behavioral Health and InterventionsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource.

Open access
Carter, Evan C., Kofler, Lilly M., Forster, Daniel E., McCullough, Michael E.·2015·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Failures of self-control are thought to underlie various important behaviors (e.g., addiction, violence, obesity, poor academic achievement). The modern conceptualization of self-control failure has been heavily influenced by the idea that self-control functions as if it relied upon a limited physiological or cognitive resource. This view of self-control has inspired hundreds of experiments designed to test the prediction that acts of self-control are more likely to fail when they follow previous acts of self-control (the depletion effect). Here, we evaluated the empirical evidence for this effect with a series of focused, meta-analytic tests that address the limitations in prior appraisals of the evidence. We find very little evidence that the depletion effect is a real phenomenon, at least when assessed with the methods most frequently used in the laboratory. Our results strongly challenge the idea that self-control functions as if it relies on a limited psychological or physical resource.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000083

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2015-08
Volume
144
Issue
4
Pages
796-815
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2186516452
Cited by
594
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 10
FWCI
98.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
self-control, depletion effect, resource constraints, cognitive control, self-control failure, obesity, violence
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Ego, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review