Cited by 134Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

21st century neurobehavioral theories of decision making in addiction: Review and evaluation

Open access
Bickel, Warren K., Mellis, Alexandra M., Snider, Sarah E., Athamneh, Liqa N., Stein, Jeffrey S., Pope, Derek A.·2018·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

This review critically examines neurobehavioral theoretical developments in decision making in addiction in the 21st century. We specifically compare each theory reviewed to seven benchmarks of theoretical robustness, based on their ability to address: why some commodities are addictive; developmental trends in addiction; addiction-related anhedonia; self-defeating patterns of behavior in addiction; why addiction co-occurs with other unhealthy behaviors; and, finally, means for the repair of addiction. We have included only self-contained theories or hypotheses which have been developed or extended in the 21st century to address decision making in addiction. We thus review seven distinct theories of decision making in addiction: learning theories, incentive-sensitization theory, dopamine imbalance and systems models, opponent process theory, strength models of self-control failure, the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory, and the triadic systems theory of addiction. Finally, we have directly compared the performance of each of these theories based on the aforementioned benchmarks, and highlighted key points at which several theories have coalesced.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2017.09.009

Cites

295 of 295 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tendency for an activity to become addictive depends upon when it was first performed, adolescence and early adulthood representing the most vulnerable period for both drug and sexual addictions.

    “The tendency for an activity to become addictive depends upon when it was first performed, adolescence and early adulthood representing the most vulnerable period for both drug (Bickel et al., 2018) and sexual (Black et al., 1997;Hall, 2019;Kafka, 1997) addictions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 297 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Khantzian EJ 1987 The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: Focus on heroin and cocaine dependence Allen DF The Cocaine Crisis 65 74 Springer US 3904487
  2. Koob GF Le Moal M 2008b Addiction and the brain antireward system Annual Review of Psychology 59 29 53 18154498

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickel, W. K., Mellis, A. M., Snider, S. E., Athamneh, L. N., Stein, J. S., & Pope, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Carilion Clinic (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Bickel, Warren K.
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
164
Pages
4-21
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758629277
Cited by
134
References
297
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5UH2DK109543, 5R01DA039456, 5R21DA040559, DP7OD018428, R01AA021529, R01DA034755, R01DA036017, U19CA157345, R01MD007054, 1P01CA200512, 1R01DA042535, 1R21AA023605, R01DA030241)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
addiction, decision-making, incentive-sensitization theory, opponent process theory, learning theory, self-control failure, strength model, anhedonia
MeSH terms
Animals, Decision Making, Dopamine, Humans, Models, Psychological, Health Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, History, 21st Century, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review