Cited by 6,183Multisensory perception and integrationPhonetics and Phonology ResearchSpeech and Audio Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hearing lips and seeing voices

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/264746a0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,021 of 1,021

Metadata

Authors
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1976-12
Volume
264
Issue
5588
Pages
746-748
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2015394094
Cited by
6,183
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 218 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 259 · 2019: 311 · 2018: 268 · 2017: 259 · 2016: 268 · 2015: 273 · 2014: 260 · 2013: 249 · 2012: 246
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech perception, visual speech, lip reading, audiovisual speech integration, syllable perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Auditory Perception, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, Speech, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review