Cited by 489Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Increased vulnerability of hippocampal neurons to excitotoxic necrosis in presenilin-1 mutant knock-in mice

Guo, Qing, Fu, Weiming, Sopher, Bryce L., Miller, Miles W., Ware, Carol B., Martin, George M., Mattson, Mark P.·1999·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Excitotoxicity, a form of neuronal injury in which excessive activation of glutamate receptors results in cellular calcium overload, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD), although direct evidence is lacking. Mutations in the presenilin-1 (PS1) gene on chromosome 14 are causally linked to many cases of early-onset inherited AD (refs. 5,6). We generated PS1 mutant mice (PS1M146VKI) that express the PS1 M146V targeted allele at normal physiological levels. Although PS1M146VKI mice have no overt mutant phenotype, they are hypersensitive to seizure-induced synaptic degeneration and necrotic neuronal death in the hippocampus. Cultured hippocampal neurons from PS1M146VKI mice have increased vulnerability to death induced by glutamate, which is correlated with perturbed calcium homeostasis, increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Agents that suppress calcium influx or release and antioxidants protect neurons against the excitotoxic action of the PS1 mutation. These findings establish a direct link between a genetic defect that causes AD and excitotoxic neuronal degeneration, and indicate new avenues for therapeutic intervention in AD patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/4789

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Q., Fu, W., Sopher, B. L., Miller, M. W., Ware, C. B., Martin, G. M., & Mattson, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Mattson, Mark P.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
1999-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
101-106
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W1566528879
Cited by
489
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
27.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
presenilin 1, excitotoxicity, hippocampal neurons, neuronal necrosis, Alzheimer's disease, glutamate excitotoxicity, calcium homeostasis, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, knock-in mice, calcium channel blockers, antioxidants
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Kainic Acid, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Mice, Knockout, Glutamic Acid, Mice, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review