Cited by 1,979Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 9 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/536143a

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

6 of 9 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 20 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 2
7 of 7
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The IUCN Red List threat information is sufficiently accurate and complete to quantify the relative prevalence of current hazards to biodiversity.

    “To assess the relative prevalence of current hazards to biodiversity, we quantified threat information for 8,688 near-threatened or threatened species belonging to species groups in which all known species have been assessed”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Healthy ecosystems are better repositories for carbon.

    “Healthy ecosystems are better repositories for carbon.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Farming contributes substantially to greenhouse-gas emissions.

    “Agriculture is a major driver of greenhouse-gas emissions, for example.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Human development and population growth will continue and increase the impacts of overexploitation and agricultural expansion.

    “But human development and population growth mean that the impacts of overexploitation and agricultural expansion will also increase.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,100 of 1,973

Metadata

Authors
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M., & Watson, J. E. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (CH)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, Sean L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-08-10
Volume
536
Issue
7615
Pages
143-145
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2510388658
Cited by
1,979
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 143 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 250 · 2023: 218 · 2022: 256 · 2021: 240 · 2020: 218 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 19
FWCI
121.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
biodiversity loss, extinction drivers, IUCN Red List, species endangerment
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Cities, Firearms, Human Activities, Population Dynamics, Extinction, Biological, Endangered Species, Climate Change, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review