Cited by 291Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

KRAS mutation analysis: A comparison between primary tumours and matched liver metastases in 305 colorectal cancer patients

Open access
Knijn, N, Mekenkamp, L J M, Klomp, M, Vink-Börger, M E, Tol, J, Teerenstra, S, Meijer, J W R, Tebar, M +4 more·2011·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutation is a negative predictive factor for treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). KRAS mutation analysis is usually performed on primary tumour tissue because metastatic tissue is often not available. However, controversial data are available on the concordance of test results between primary tumours and corresponding metastases. We assessed the concordance of KRAS mutation status in a study of 305 primary colorectal tumours and their corresponding liver metastases. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed CRC who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour and biopsy or surgical resection of the corresponding liver metastasis were included. KRAS mutation analysis was performed for codons 12 and 13. RESULTS: KRAS mutation was detected in 108 out of 305 primary tumours (35.4%). In 11 cases (3.6%), we found a discordance between primary tumour and metastasis: 5 primary tumours had a KRAS mutation with a wild-type metastasis, 1 primary tumour was wild type with a KRAS mutation in the metastasis, and in 5 cases the primary tumour and the metastasis had a different KRAS mutation. CONCLUSION: We observed a high concordance of KRAS mutation status of 96.4% (95% CI 93.6-98.2%) between primary colorectal tumours and their corresponding liver metastases. In only six patients (2.0%; 95% CI 0.7-4.2%), the discordance was clinically relevant. In this largest and most homogenous study to date, we conclude that both primary tumours and liver metastases can be used for KRAS mutation analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2011.26

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knijn, N., Mekenkamp, L. J. M., Klomp, M., Vink-Börger, M. E., Tol, J., Teerenstra, S., Meijer, J. W. R., Tebar, M., Riemersma, S., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., Punt, C. J. A., & Nagtegaal, I. D.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
Corresponding author
Nagtegaal, I D
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2011-03
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
1020-1026
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2011288277
Cited by
291
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 34
FWCI
14.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
KRAS mutation, colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, primary tumor, codon 12 and 13 mutations, anti-EGFR antibody therapy, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, Carcinoma, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Mutation, Genes, ras, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Matched-Pair Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review