Cited by 107Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases

Open access
Mao, Chen, Wu, Xin-Yin, Yang, Zu-Yao, Threapleton, Diane Erin, Yuan, Jin-Qiu, Yu, Yuan-Yuan, Tang, Jin-Ling·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Current data on the concordance of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutation status or PTEN expression status between primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine concordance and discordance of the status of these four biomarkers between primary tumors and corresponding metastases in CRC patients. The biomarker status in primary tumors was used as the reference standard. Concordance data for KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN were provided by 43, 16, 9 and 7 studies, respectively. The pooled concordance rate was 92.0% (95% CI: 89.7%-93.9%) for KRAS, 96.8% (95% CI: 94.8%-98.0%) for BRAF, 93.9% (95% CI: 89.7%-96.5%) for PIK3CA and 71.7% (95% CI: 57.6%-82.5%) for PTEN. The pooled false positive and false negative rates for KRAS were 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.4%) and 11.3% (95% CI: 8.0%-15.8%), respectively. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations are highly concordant between primary tumors and corresponding metastases in CRC, but PTEN loss is not. Nine percent of patients with wild-type KRAS in primary tumors who received anti-EGFR treatment had mutant KRAS in metastases, while 11.3% patients with mutant KRAS primary tumors had wild-type KRAS in the metastases. These 11.3% patients currently do not receive potentially beneficial anti-EGFR treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep08065

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with KRAS wild-type tumors who received anti-EGFR antibody therapy revealed that 38% of these cases exhibited mutant KRAS, suggesting the clonal selection of mutant cells within metastatic lesions.

    “an analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with KRAS wild-type tumors who received anti-EGFR antibody therapy revealed that 38% of these cases exhibited mutant KRAS, suggesting the clonal selection of mutant cells within metastatic lesions [58]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, C., Wu, X.-Y., Yang, Z.-Y., Threapleton, D. E., Yuan, J.-Q., Yu, Y.-Y., & Tang, J.-L.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
8065-8065
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011847340
Cited by
107
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Food and Health Bureau
  • Health and Medical Research Fund (12130721, 11120971)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
colorectal cancer, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation, PTEN expression, primary tumor versus metastasis concordance, tumor markers, anti-EGFR therapy, false positive and false negative rates
MeSH terms
Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Mutation, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Databases, Factual, ras Proteins, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review