Cited by 114Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

KRAS and BRAF mutational status in primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: Biological and clinical implications

Italiano, Antoine, Hostein, Isabelle, Soubeyran, Isabelle, Fabas, Thibault, Benchimol, Daniel, Evrard, Serge, Gugenheim, Jean, Becouarn, Yves +5 more·2010·Annals of Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Background KRAS and BRAF mutations in primary colorectal tumors (PT) are predictive of nonresponse to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The question of primary resistance to anti-EGFR treatment as a result of the presence of KRAS or BRAF mutations only in metastases has been raised but not resolved.Methods We analyzed the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF in 64 new patients with mCRC and performed a systematic review of published data from 285 patients.Results A total of 285 and 95 matched PT/metastases were available for the analysis of the KRAS and the BRAF status, respectively. An identical mutational pattern of KRAS in PT and the matching metastases were reported in all the cases but 14 (5%). In six cases (2%), KRAS was mutated in the PT and wild type in the metastatic site, whereas in eight cases (3%), KRAS was wild type in the PT and mutated in the metastatic site. An identical mutational pattern of BRAF in PT and the matching metastases was reported in all but two cases (3%). In one case (1.5%), BRAF was mutated in the PT and wild type in the metastatic site, whereas in one case (1.5%), BRAF was wild type in the PT and mutated in the metastatic site.Conclusions The acquisition by metastases of a KRAS or a BRAF mutation that was not present in the PT is a rare event, occurring in 5% of cases of mCRC. This is not a frequent mechanism of primary resistance to anti-EGFR treatments in mCRC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1245/s10434-009-0864-z

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Italiano, A., Hostein, I., Soubeyran, I., Fabas, T., Benchimol, D., Evrard, S., Gugenheim, J., Becouarn, Y., Brunet, R., Fonck, M., François, E., Saint-Paul, M.-C., & Pedeutour, F.
Affiliations
  • Institut Bergonié (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
Venue
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2010-01-05
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1429-1434
ISSN
  • 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-4681
OpenAlex
W2006099824
Cited by
114
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, metastatic colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR antibody resistance, anti-EGFR therapy
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review