Cited by 190Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The neandertal genome and ancient DNA authenticity

Open access
Green, Richard E, Briggs, Adrian W, Krause, Johannes, Prüfer, Kay, Burbano, Hernán A, Siebauer, Michael, Lachmann, Michael, Pääbo, Svante·2009·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Recent advances in high-thoughput DNA sequencing have made genome-scale analyses of genomes of extinct organisms possible. With these new opportunities come new difficulties in assessing the authenticity of the DNA sequences retrieved. We discuss how these difficulties can be addressed, particularly with regard to analyses of the Neandertal genome. We argue that only direct assays of DNA sequence positions in which Neandertals differ from all contemporary humans can serve as a reliable means to estimate human contamination. Indirect measures, such as the extent of DNA fragmentation, nucleotide misincorporations, or comparison of derived allele frequencies in different fragment size classes, are unreliable. Fortunately, interim approaches based on mtDNA differences between Neandertals and current humans, detection of male contamination through Y chromosomal sequences, and repeated sequencing from the same fossil to detect autosomal contamination allow initial large-scale sequencing of Neandertal genomes. This will result in the discovery of fixed differences in the nuclear genome between Neandertals and current humans that can serve as future direct assays for contamination. For analyses of other fossil hominins, which may become possible in the future, we suggest a similar 'boot-strap' approach in which interim approaches are applied until sufficient data for more definitive direct assays are acquired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/emboj.2009.222

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • aDNA samples typically have contamination from microbial DNA and present-day humans, which often represents the bulk of the DNA extracted from ancient remains.

    “Moreover, there will typically be contamination from microbial DNA (modern or ancient), which often represents the bulk of the DNA extracted from ancient remains as well as contamination from present-day humans who have handled the sample [3].”

    From <tt>SAFARI</tt> : pangenome alignment of ancient DNA using purine/pyrimidine encodings (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    In “MtDNA as an inroad to the Neandertal genome” (page unavailable), the paper says Neandertal DNA libraries contain at most a few percent Neandertal DNA, with the rest coming from microbes that colonized the bones. “Ancient DNA and authenticity” (page unavailable) calls human DNA a common contaminant of fossils and laboratory experiments. These passages support the contamination concern, but the microbial-majority finding is stated for Neandertal libraries rather than ancient remains generally, and the paper does not specifically attribute human contamination to people handling the sample. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • aDNA data tends to be very low-coverage.

    “This entails that the data will tend to be very low-coverage.”

    From <tt>SAFARI</tt> : pangenome alignment of ancient DNA using purine/pyrimidine encodings (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Autosomal contamination estimates section says one method requires relatively high genome coverage and substantial sequencing, but does not say ancient DNA datasets generally have very low coverage. The Conclusions and prospects section discusses the possibility of sequencing ancient genomes to high coverage. Searches for low coverage and limited sequencing depth found no passage establishing the claimed tendency. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, R. E., Briggs, A. W., Krause, J., Prüfer, K., Burbano, H. A., Siebauer, M., Lachmann, M., & Pääbo, S.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Pääbo, Svante
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2009-08-06
Volume
28
Issue
17
Pages
2494-2502
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2092369215
Cited by
190
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
ancient DNA, human contamination, contamination detection, mitochondrial DNA, Y chromosome, fossil hominins, derived allele frequency, DNA fragmentation
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, DNA, Mitochondrial, Fossils, Humans, Phylogeny, Genetic Variation, Hominidae, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review