Cited by 238Sex and Gender in HealthcareDiversity and Career in MedicineCareer Development and Diversity

Sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery

Open access
Klein, Sabra L., Schiebinger, Londa, Stefanick, Marcia L., Cahill, Larry, Danska, Jayne, de Vries, Geert J., Kibbe, Melina R., McCarthy, Margaret M. +3 more·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Much of our understanding of disease processes and treatments begins with preclinical studies that use nonhuman animals and cell cultures. Such studies are integral to biomedical research and the development pipeline for drugs, devices, and biologics. Most preclinical biomedical research, however, has been conducted with inadequate consideration of sex (1⇓–3).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1502843112

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most preclinical researchers avoid studying female rodents due to the added complexity of research plans.

    “Still, most preclinical researchers avoid studying female rodents due to the added complexity of research plans [1]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, S. L., Schiebinger, L., Stefanick, M. L., Cahill, L., Danska, J., de Vries, G. J., Kibbe, M. R., McCarthy, M. M., Mogil, J. S., Woodruff, T. K., & Zucker, I.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • History of Science, and
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302;
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-04-20
Volume
112
Issue
17
Pages
5257-5258
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2095228051
Cited by
238
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 7
FWCI
31.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA060553)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
sex differences, basic research, scientific discovery, gender diversity in research
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Male, Reproduction, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review