CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parametric down-conversion photon-pair source on a nanophotonic chip

Guo, Xiang, Zou, Chang-ling, Schuck, Carsten, Jung, Hojoong, Cheng, Risheng, Tang, Hong X·2016·Light: Science & Applications
DOI 10.1038/lsa.2016.249PMC PMC6062195
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/lsa.2016.249

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other nonlinear material platforms including lithium niobate, aluminum nitride, indium phosphide, silicon carbide, and heterogeneous approaches have tradeoffs including higher waveguide loss and complex fabrication that hinder scalability and reliability.

    “Other nonlinear material platforms have been developed to address some of these issues, including lithium niobate [18], aluminum nitride [19], indium phosphide [20], silicon carbide [21], and heterogeneous approaches [13,22], but each has tradeoffs including higher waveguide loss and complex fabrication that hinder the scalability and reliability.”

    From Ultrabright Entangled-Photon-Pair Generation from anAlGaAs-On-Insulator Microring Resonator (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. O’Brien JL, Furusawa A, Vučković J . Photonic quantum technologies. Nat Photonics 2009; 3: 687–695. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ma XS, Herbst T, Scheidl T, Wang DQ, Kropatschek S et al. Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward. Nature 2012; 489: 269–273. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bussières F, Clausen C, Tiranov A, Korzh B, Verma VB et al. Quantum teleportation from a telecom-wavelength photon to a solid-state quantum memory. Nat Photonics 2014; 8: 775–778. · DOI
  4. Matthews JCF, Politi A, Stefanov A, O’Brien JL . Manipulation of multiphoton entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits. Nat Photonics 2009; 3: 346–350. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Shadbolt PJ, Verde MR, Peruzzo A, Politi A, Laing A et al. Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Nat Photonics 2012; 6: 45–49. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Huang YF, Liu BH, Peng L, Li YH, Li L et al. Experimental generation of an eight-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state. Nat Commun 2011; 2: 546. · DOI
  7. Spring JB, Metcalf BJ, Humphreys PC, Kolthammer WS, Jin XM et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 2013; 339: 798–801. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lu CY, Browne DE, Yang T, Pan JW . Demonstration of a compiled version of Shor’S quantum factoring algorithm using photonic qubits. Phys Rev Lett 2007; 99: 250504. · DOI
  9. Politi A, Matthews JCF, O’Brien JL . Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm on a photonic chip. Science 2009; 325: 1221. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Martín-López E, Laing A, Lawson T, Alvarez R, Zhou XQ et al. Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using qubit recycling. Nat Photonics 2012; 6: 773–776. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhou XQ, Kalasuwan P, Ralph TC, O’Brien JL . Calculating unknown eigenvalues with a quantum algorithm. Nat Photonics 2013; 7: 223–228. · DOI
  12. Giustina M, Versteegh MAM, Wengerowsky S, Handsteiner J, Hochrainer A et al. Significant-loophole-free test of bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys Rev Lett 2015; 115: 250401. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Shalm LK, Meyer-Scott E, Christensen BG, Bierhorst P, Wayne MA et al. Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Phys Rev Lett 2015; 115: 250402. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kruse R, Katzschmann F, Christ A, Schreiber A, Wilhelm S et al. Spatio-spectral characteristics of parametric down-conversion in waveguide arrays. New J Phys 2013; 15: 083046. · DOI
  15. Solntsev AS, Setzpfandt F, Clark AS, Wu CW, Collins MJ et al. Generation of nonclassical biphoton states through cascaded quantum walks on a nonlinear chip. Phys Rev X 2014; 4: 031007.
  16. Jin H, Liu FM, Xu P, Xia JL, Zhong ML et al. On-chip generation and manipulation of entangled photons based on reconfigurable lithium-niobate waveguide circuits. Phys Rev Lett 2014; 113: 103601. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Tanzilli S, De La Rue R, Tanzilli S, Martin A, Kaiser F et al. On the genesis and evolution of Integrated Quantum Optics. Laser Photonics Rev 2012; 6: 115–143. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Politi A, Cryan MJ, Rarity JG, Yu SY, O’Brien JL . Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science 2008; 320: 646–649. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Schuck C, Guo X, Fan L, Ma X, Poot M et al. Quantum interference in heterogeneous superconducting-photonic circuits on a silicon chip. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 10352. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sharping JE, Lee KF, Foster MA, Turner AC, Schmidt BS et al. Generation of correlated photons in nanoscale silicon waveguides. Opt Express 2006; 14: 12388–12393. · DOI
  21. Clemmen S, Huy KP, Bogaerts W, Baets RG, Emplit P et al. Continuous wave photon pair generation in silicon-on-insulator waveguides and ring resonators. Opt Express 2009; 17: 16558–16570. · DOI
  22. Silverstone JW, Bonneau D, Ohira K, Suzuki N, Yoshida H et al. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources. Nat Photonics 2014; 8: 104–108. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Harris NC, Grassani D, Simbula A, Pant M, Galli M et al. Integrated source of spectrally filtered correlated photons for large-scale quantum photonic systems. Phys Rev X 2014; 4: 041047.
  24. Collins MJ, Xiong C, Rey IH, Vo TD, He J et al. Integrated spatial multiplexing of heralded single-photon sources. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2582. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Matsuda N, Le Jeannic H, Fukuda H, Tsuchizawa T, Munro WJ et al. A monolithically integrated polarization entangled photon pair source on a silicon chip. Sci Rep 2012; 2: 817. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Grassani D, Azzini S, Liscidini M, Galli M, Strain MJ et al. Micrometer-scale integrated silicon source of time-energy entangled photons. Optica 2015; 2: 88–94. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Silverstone JW, Santagati R, Bonneau D, Strain MJ, Sorel M et al. Qubit entanglement between ring-resonator photon-pair sources on a silicon chip. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 7948. · DOI
  28. Guo X, Zou CL, Tang HX . 70 dB long-pass filter on a nanophotonic chip. Opt Express 2016; 24: 21167–21176. · DOI
  29. Xiong C, Pernice WHP, Sun XK, Schuck C, Fong KY et al. Aluminum nitride as a new material for chip-scale optomechanics and nonlinear optics. New J Phys 2012; 14: 095014. · DOI
  30. Pernice WHP, Xiong C, Schuck C, Tang HX . Second harmonic generation in phase matched aluminum nitride waveguides and micro-ring resonators. Appl Phys Lett 2012; 100: 223501. · DOI
  31. Yang ZS, Sipe JE . Generating entangled photons via enhanced spontaneous parametric downconversion in AlGaAs microring resonators. Opt Lett 2007; 32: 3296–3298. · DOI
  32. Schuck C, Pernice WHP, Tang HX . Waveguide integrated low noise NbTiN nanowire single-photon detectors with milli-Hz dark count rate. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 1893. · DOI
  33. Levy JS, Foster MA, Gaeta AL, Lipson M . Harmonic generation in silicon nitride ring resonators. Opt Express 2011; 19: 11415–11421. · DOI
  34. Schuck C, Pernice WHP, Ma X, Tang HX . Optical time domain reflectometry with low noise waveguide-coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Appl Phys Lett 2013; 102: 191104. · DOI
  35. Förtsch M, Schunk G, Fürst JU, Strekalov D, Gerrits T et al. Highly efficient generation of single-mode photon pairs from a crystalline whispering-gallery-mode resonator source. Phys Rev A 2015; 91: 023812. · DOI
  36. Förtsch M, Fürst JU, Wittmann C, Strekalov D, Aiello A et al. A versatile source of single photons for quantum information processing. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 1818. · DOI
  37. Reimer C, Caspani L, Clerici M, Ferrera M, Kues M et al. Integrated frequency comb source of heralded single photons. Opt Express 2014; 22: 6535–6546. · DOI
  38. Clausen C, Bussières F, Tiranov A, Herrmann H, Silberhorn C et al. A source of polarization-entangled photon pairs interfacing quantum memories with telecom photons. New J Phys 2014; 16: 093058. · DOI
  39. Blauensteiner B, Herbauts I, Bettelli S, Poppe A, Hübel H . Photon bunching in parametric down-conversion with continuous-wave excitation. Phys Rev A 2009; 79: 063846. · DOI
  40. Christ A, Laiho K, Eckstein A, Cassemiro KN, Silberhorn C . Probing multimode squeezing with correlation functions. New J Phys 2011; 13: 033027. · DOI
  41. Hu JY, Yu B, Jing MY, Xiao LT, Jia ST et al. Experimental quantum secure direct communication with single photons. Light Sci Appl 2016; 5: e16144 doi:10.1038/lsa.2016.144. · DOI
  42. Reithmaier G, Kaniber M, Flassig F, Lichtmannecker S, Müller K et al. On-chip generation, routing, and detection of resonance fluorescence. Nano Lett 2015; 15: 5208–5213. · DOI
  43. Lundskog A, Hsu CW, Fredrik KK, Amloy S, Nilsson D et al. Direct generation of linearly polarized photon emission with designated orientations from site-controlled InGaN quantum dots. Light Sci Appl 2014; 3: e139 doi:10.1038/lsa.2014.20. · DOI
  44. Bettelli S . Comment on ‘Coherence measures for heralded single-photon sources’. Phys Rev A 2010; 81: 037801. · DOI
  45. Rath P, Kahl O, Ferrari S, Sproll F, Lewes-Malandrakis G et al. Superconducting single-photon detectors integrated with diamond nanophotonic circuits. Light Sci Appl 2015; 4: e338 doi:10.1038/lsa.2015.111. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Zhang J, Itzler MA, Zbinden H, Pan JW . Advances in InGaAs/InP single-photon detector systems for quantum communication. Light Sci Appl 2015; 4: e286 doi:10.1038/lsa.2015.59. · DOI
  47. Spring JB, Salter PS, Metcalf BJ, Humphreys PC, Moore M et al. On-chip low loss heralded source of pure single photons. Opt Express 2013; 21: 13522–13532. · DOI
  48. Cao DY, Liu BH, Wang Z, Huang YF, Li CF et al. Multiuser-to-multiuser entanglement distribution based on 1550 nm polarization-entangled photons. Sci Bull 2015; 60: 1128–1132. · DOI
  49. Zheng C, Long GF . Quantum secure direct dialogue using Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 2014; 57: 1238–1243. · DOI
  50. Wang C, Burek MJ, Lin Z, Atikian HA, Venkataraman V et al. Integrated high quality factor lithium niobate microdisk resonators. Opt Express 2014; 22: 30924–30933. · DOI
  51. Lin JT, Xu YX, Fang ZW, Wang M, Song JX et al. Fabrication of high-Q lithium niobate microresonators using femtosecond laser micromachining. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 8072. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guo, X., Zou, C.-L., Schuck, C., Jung, H., Cheng, R., & Tang, H. X.
ORCID
Venue
Light: Science & Applications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-11-07
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e16249-e16249
ISSN
2047-7538
DOI
10.1038/lsa.2016.249
PMC
PMC6062195
Cited by
291
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review