CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 13Evolution and Genetic DynamicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsGenetic diversity and population structure

The coalescent in finite populations with arbitrary, fixed structure

Open access
Allen, Benjamin, McAvoy, Alex·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2207.02880arXiv 2207.02880
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The coalescent is a stochastic process representing ancestral lineages in a population undergoing neutral genetic drift. Originally defined for a well-mixed population, the coalescent has been adapted in various ways to accommodate spatial, age, and class structure, along with other features of real-world populations. To further extend the range of population structures to which coalescent theory applies, we formulate a coalescent process for a broad class of neutral drift models with arbitrary -- but fixed -- spatial, age, sex, and class structure, haploid or diploid genetics, and any fixed mating pattern. Here, the coalescent is represented as a random sequence of mappings $\mathcal{C} = \left(C_t\right)_{t=0}^\infty$ from a finite set $G$ to itself. The set $G$ represents the ``sites'' (in individuals, in particular locations and/or classes) at which these alleles can live. The state of the coalescent, $C_t:G \to G$, maps each site $g \in G$ to the site containing $g$'s ancestor, $t$ time-steps into the past. Using this representation, we define and analyze coalescence time, coalescence branch length, mutations prior to coalescence, and stationary probabilities of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state. For low mutation, we provide a recipe for computing identity-by-descent and identity-by-state probabilities via the coalescent. Applying our results to a diploid population with arbitrary sex ratio $r$, we find that measures of genetic dissimilarity, among any set of sites, are scaled by $4r(1-r)$ relative to the even sex ratio case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2207.02880

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weak-mutation dynamics do not necessarily predict what happens when mutation rates are larger.

    “Furthermore, weak-mutation dynamics do not necessarily predict what happens when mutation rates are larger [36, 58].”

    From Strategy evolution on dynamic networks (2023) · cites this paper as [58]

    Section 5 (p. 9) describes its results as asymptotic relationships under low mutation. Section 5.3 (p. 10) says a similar relationship applies at larger mutation rates only when rates are constant across sites and independent of parentage. This supports caution about extending low-mutation results, but the cited passages do not show that weak-mutation dynamics fail to predict dynamics at larger rates. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Antal, T., Traulsen, A., Ohtsuki, H., Tarnita, C.E., Nowak, M.A., 2009b. Mutationselection equilibrium in games with multiple strategies. J. Theoret. Biol. 258 (4), 614-622. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0040-5809(2400064-9/sb10)
  2. Ewens, W.J., 2004. Mathematical Population Genetics 1: Theoretical Introduction, Vol. 27, second ed. Springer Science & Business Media, New York. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0040-5809(2400064-9/sb33)
  3. Kemeny, J.G., Snell, J.L., 1976. Finite Markov Chains. Springer-Verlag. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0040-5809(2400064-9/sb57)
  4. Malécot, G., 1948. Les Mathématiques de l'Hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0040-5809(2400064-9/sb70)
  5. Spivak, M., 1994. Calculus, third ed. Publish or Perish, Houston, TX, USA. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0040-5809(2400064-9/sb106)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Allen, B., & McAvoy, A.
Affiliations
  • Emmanuel College - Massachusetts (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Allen, Benjamin
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
158
Pages
150-169
ISSN
0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2207.02880
arXiv
2207.02880
OpenAlex
W4399709291
Cited by
12
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Theoretical Population Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (62220)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
coalescent, finite population, population structure, identity by descent, identity by state, coalescence time, genetic mutations, diploid populations, sex ratio, genetic dissimilarity, random maps, mating patterns
MeSH terms
Diploidy, Genetics, Population, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Stochastic Processes, Genetic Drift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review