The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption
Open accessAbstract
The violation of a Bell inequality is an experimental observation that forces the abandonment of a local realistic viewpoint--namely, one in which physical properties are (probabilistically) defined before and independently of measurement, and in which no physical influence can propagate faster than the speed of light. All such experimental violations require additional assumptions depending on their specific construction, making them vulnerable to so-called loopholes. Here we use entangled photons to violate a Bell inequality while closing the fair-sampling loophole, that is, without assuming that the sample of measured photons accurately represents the entire ensemble. To do this, we use the Eberhard form of Bell's inequality, which is not vulnerable to the fair-sampling assumption and which allows a lower collection efficiency than other forms. Technical improvements of the photon source and high-efficiency transition-edge sensors were crucial for achieving a sufficiently high collection efficiency. Our experiment makes the photon the first physical system for which each of the main loopholes has been closed, albeit in different experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As the CHSH inequality is minimally violated in an optically realised system, 64,65 the randomness output is also very small (with min-entropy of H min =7.2 × 10 -5 in each run), and the randomness generation rate is 0.4 bits per s.”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [64]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804 · Cited by 3,942
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985
Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Freedman, S. J., & Clauser, J. F. (1972) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.938 · Cited by 1,999
Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5039 · Cited by 1,643
Self-citationExperimental consequences of objective local theories
Clauser, J. F., & Horne, M. A. (1974) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.526 · Cited by 1,537
Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection
Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057215 · Cited by 1,043
Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency
Lita, A. E., Miller, A. J., & Nam, S. W. (2008) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.16.003032 · Cited by 734
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Alicki, R. Remarks on the violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4009 (2009) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres
Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15759 · Cited by 2,852
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons
Giustina, M., Versteegh, M. A. M., Wengerowsky, S., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Phelan, K., Steinlechner, F., Kofler, J., Larsson, J.-Å., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250401 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationStrong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism
Shalm, L. K., Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B. G., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M. A., Stevens, M. J., Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Hamel, D. R., Allman, M. S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250402 · Cited by 1,402
Self-citationMicrowave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X. Q., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,337
Quantum random number generators
Herrero-Collantes, M., & García-Escartín, J. C. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.015004 · Cited by 850
Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions
Erhard, M., Fickler, R., Krenn, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.146 · Cited by 670
Self-citationQuantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet
Azuma, K., Economou, S. E., Elkouss, D., Hilaire, P., Jiang, L., Lo, H., & Tzitrin, I. (2023) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.045006 · Cited by 681
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Schnabel, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 562
Fully Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Vazirani, U. V., & Vidick, T. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.140501 · Cited by 519
Detection-Loophole-Free Test of Quantum Nonlocality, and Applications
Christensen, B. G., McCusker, K. T., Altepeter, J. B., Calkins, B., Gerrits, T., Lita, A. E., Miller, A., Shalm, L. K., Zhang, Y., Nam, S. W., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.130406 · Cited by 477
Self-citationQuantum random number generation
Ma, X., Yuan, X., Cao, Z., Qi, B., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.21 · Cited by 445
Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions
Arndt, M., & Hornberger, K. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2863 · Cited by 432
Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale
Kovachy, T., Asenbaum, P., Overstreet, C., Donnelly, C. A., Dickerson, S. M., Sugarbaker, A., Hogan, J. M., & Kasevich, M. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16155 · Cited by 421
Security in quantum cryptography
Portmann, C., & Renner, R. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.025008 · Cited by 475
Certified randomness in quantum physics
Acín, A., & Masanes, L. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20119 · Cited by 307
Open-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review
Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/4/042001 · Cited by 328
A Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment
Peruzzo, A., Shadbolt, P., Brunner, N., Popescu, S., & O’Brien, J. L. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226719 · Cited by 275
Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism
Larsson, J.-Å. (2014) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424003 · Cited by 261
Open-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review
Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-20820 · Cited by 258
Walk, N., Hosseini, S., Geng, J., Thearle, O., Haw, J. Y., Armstrong, S., Assad, S. M., Janoušek, J., Ralph, T. C., Symul, T., et al. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.000634 · Cited by 223
Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars
Handsteiner, J., Friedman, A. S., Rauch, D., Gallicchio, J. R., Liu, B., Hosp, H., Kofler, J., Bricher, D., Fink, M., Leung, C., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.060401 · Cited by 211
Self-citationCondition for macroscopic realism beyond the Leggett-Garg inequalities
Kofler, J., & Brukner, Č. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.052115 · Cited by 206
Self-citationAtomic Hong–Ou–Mandel experiment
Lopes, R., Imanaliev, A., Aspect, A., Cheneau, M., Boiron, D., & Westbrook, C. I. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14331 · Cited by 195
Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate
Aspect, A. (2015) · Physics · doi:10.1103/physics.8.123 · Cited by 214
Cosmic Bell Test Using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars
Rauch, D., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Gallicchio, J. R., Friedman, A. S., Leung, C., Liu, B., Bulla, L., Ecker, S., Steinlechner, F., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.080403 · Cited by 201
Self-citationHarder, G., Bartley, T. J., Lita, A. E., Nam, S. W., Gerrits, T., & Silberhorn, C. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.143601 · Cited by 179
Self-citationAdvances in device-independent quantum key distribution
Zapatero, V., van Leent, T., Arnon-Friedman, R., Liu, W., Zhang, Q., Weinfurter, H., & Curty, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00684-x · Cited by 193
Ceccarelli, F., Acconcia, G., Gulinatti, A., Ghioni, M., Rech, I., & Osellame, R. (2020) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000102 · Cited by 176
Reid, M. D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.062338 · Cited by 158
Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?
Laloë, F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108569361 · Cited by 171
Quantum randomness extraction for various levels of characterization of the devices
Law, Y. Z., Le, T. P., Bancal, J.-D., & Scarani, V. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424028 · Cited by 160
Entangled photon-pair sources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals
Anwar, A., Perumangatt, C., Steinlechner, F., Jennewein, T., & Ling, A. (2021) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0023103 · Cited by 169
More randomness from the same data
Bancal, J.-D., Sheridan, L., & Scarani, V. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033011 · Cited by 148
Toward a Photonic Demonstration of Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhen, Y.-Z., Li, M.-H., Liu, Y., Fan, J., Xu, F., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.050502 · Cited by 162
Using complete measurement statistics for optimal device-independent randomness evaluation
Nieto-Silleras, O., Pironio, S., & Silman, J. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013035 · Cited by 132
Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions
Erven, C., Meyer-Scott, E., Bonsma-Fisher, K., Lavoie, J., Higgins, B. L., Yan, Z., Pugh, C. J., Bourgoin, J.-P., Prevedel, R., Shalm, L. K., et al. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.50 · Cited by 127
Unifying Framework for Relaxations of the Causal Assumptions in Bell’s Theorem
Chaves, R., Kueng, R., Brask, J. B., & Gross, D. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.140403 · Cited by 125
Spontaneous Parametric Down‐Conversion Sources for Multiphoton Experiments
Zhang, C., Huang, Y., Liu, B., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000132 · Cited by 139
The ultimate physical limits of privacy
EKERT, A. K., & Renner, R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13132 · Cited by 127
Generation of Fresh and Pure Random Numbers for Loophole-Free Bell Tests
Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Mitrani, D., Pruneri, V., & Mitchell, M. W. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250403 · Cited by 115
Kaneda, F., Garay-Palmett, K., U’Ren, A. B., & Kwiat, P. G. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.010733 · Cited by 117
Mannalath, V., Mishra, S., & Pathak, A. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04175-y · Cited by 125
“Later proposals relaxed some conditions in order to have higher bit generation rates using optical components [62].”
Scalable Spatial Superresolution Using Entangled Photons
Rozema, L. A., Bateman, J. D., Mahler, D. H., Okamoto, R., Feizpour, A., Hayat, A., & Steinberg, A. M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.223602 · Cited by 107
Hybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell’s inequality using two different atomic isotopes
Ballance, C. J., Schäfer, V. M., Home, J., Szwer, D. J., Webster, S. C., Allcock, D. T. C., Linke, N. M., Harty, T. P., Craik, D. P. L. A., Stacey, D. N., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16184 · Cited by 100
Belenchia, A., Carlesso, M., Bayraktar, Ö., Dequal, D., Derkach, I. D., Gasbarri, G., Herr, W., Li, Y. L., Rademacher, M., Sidhu, J. S., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.004 · Cited by 109
Testing Bell’s Inequality with Cosmic Photons: Closing the Setting-Independence Loophole
Gallicchio, J., Friedman, A. S., & Kaiser, D. I. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.110405 · Cited by 99
Testing foundations of quantum mechanics with photons
Shadbolt, P., Mathews, J. C. F., Laing, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2931 · Cited by 100
Transforming Bell’s inequalities into state classifiers with machine learning
Ma, Y., & Yung, M. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0081-3 · Cited by 109
Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis
Hensen, B., Kalb, N., Blok, M., Dréau, A., Reiserer, A., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Goodenough, K., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30289 · Cited by 100
Statistics, Causality and Bell’s Theorem
Gill, R. D. (2014) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/14-sts490 · Cited by 104
Hu, M., Zhou, Z., Hu, X., Li, C., Guo, G., & Zhang, Y.-S. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0115-x · Cited by 109
Test of Local Realism into the Past without Detection and Locality Loopholes
Li, M., Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Bai, B., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Zhao, Q., Li, H., Wang, Z., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.080404 · Cited by 99
Experimental Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-Type Six-Photon Quantum Nonlocality
Zhang, C., Huang, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, B., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.260402 · Cited by 90
Pulsed Sagnac polarization-entangled photon source with a PPKTP crystal at telecom wavelength
Jin, R.-B., Shimizu, R., Wakui, K., Fujiwara, M., Yamashita, T., Miki, S., Terai, H., Wang, Z., & Sasaki, M. (2014) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.22.011498 · Cited by 89
Steinlechner, F., Basset, M. G., Jofre, M., Scheidl, T., Torres, J. P., Pruneri, V., & Ursin, R. (2014) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.31.002068 · Cited by 88
Self-citationRequirements for a loophole-free photonic Bell test using imperfect setting generators
Kofler, J., Giustina, M., Larsson, J.-Å., & Mitchell, M. W. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032115 · Cited by 93
Self-citationFamily of Bell-like Inequalities as Device-Independent Witnesses for Entanglement Depth
Liang, Y.-C., Rosset, D., Bancal, J.-D., Pütz, G., Barnea, T. J., & Gisin, N. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.190401 · Cited by 83
Entanglement: quantum or classical?
Paneru, D., Cohen, E., Fickler, R., Boyd, R. W., & Karimi, E. (2020) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab85b9 · Cited by 86
Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis
Schwonnek, R., Goh, K. T., Primaatmaja, I. W., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Wolf, R., Scarani, V., & Lim, C. C.-W. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23147-3 · Cited by 98
Applications of single photons in quantum metrology, biology and the foundations of quantum physics
Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A. J., & Weihs, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00589-w · Cited by 87
Self-citationRandomness Extraction from Bell Violation with Continuous Parametric Down-Conversion
Shen, L., Lee, J., Le, T. P., Bancal, J.-D., Ceré, A., Lamas-Linares, A., Lita, A. E., Gerrits, T., Nam, S. W., Scarani, V., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.150402 · Cited by 83
Self-citationAll-photonic intercity quantum key distribution
Azuma, K., Tamaki, K., & Munro, W. J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10171 · Cited by 70
Machine Learning Detection of Bell Nonlocality in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Deng, D.-L. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240402 · Cited by 77
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Local Bell Test
Lim, C. C. W., Portmann, C., Tomamichel, M., Renner, R., & Gisin, N. (2013) · Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000070652 · Cited by 72
Asano, M., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A. Y., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., & Yamato, I. (2015) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9929-y · Cited by 70
Baumeler, Ä., Feix, A., & Wolf, S. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.042106 · Cited by 79
Device-independent quantum key distribution with single-photon sources
Kołodyński, J., Máttar, A., Skrzypczyk, P., Woodhead, E., Cavalcanti, D., Banaszek, K., & Acín, A. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-30-260 · Cited by 80
Light for the quantum. Entangled photons and their applications: a very personal perspective
Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/aa736d · Cited by 66
Self-citationA robust mathematical model for a loophole-free Clauser–Horne experiment
Bierhorst, P. (2015) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/19/195302 · Cited by 69
Meyer-Scott, E., Prasannan, N., Eigner, C., Quiring, V., Donohue, J. M., Barkhofen, S., & Silberhorn, C. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.032475 · Cited by 70
CW-pumped telecom band polarization entangled photon pair generation in a Sagnac interferometer
Li, Y., Zhou, Z., Ding, D.-S., & Shi, B. (2015) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.23.028792 · Cited by 66
Ho, M., Sekatski, P., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., Bancal, J.-D., & Sangouard, N. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.230502 · Cited by 67
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Local Bell Test
Lim, C. C. W., Portmann, C., Tomamichel, M., Renner, R., & Gisin, N. (2013) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.3.031006 · Cited by 118
Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis
Schwonnek, R., Goh, K. T., Primaatmaja, I. W., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Wolf, R., Scarani, V., & Lim, C. C. W. (2021) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000488144 · Cited by 65
Silicon-on-insulator integrated source of polarization-entangled photons
Olislager, L., Safioui, J., Clemmen, S., Huy, K. P., Bogaerts, W., Baets, R., Emplit, P., & Massar, S. (2013) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.38.001960 · Cited by 59
CHSH Inequality: Quantum Probabilities as Classical Conditional Probabilities
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2014) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9851-8 · Cited by 64
Jogenfors, J., Hassan, A. M. E., Ahrens, J., Bourennane, M., & Larsson, J.-Å. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500793 · Cited by 61
Opanchuk, B., Arnaud, L., & Reid, M. D. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.062101 · Cited by 60
Decoherence of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering
Rosales-Zárate, L., Teh, R. Y., Kiesewetter, S., Brolis, A., Ng, K., & Reid, M. D. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.000a82 · Cited by 58
Heralding efficiency and correlated-mode coupling of near-IR fiber-coupled photon pairs
Dixon, P. B., Rosenberg, D., Stelmakh, V., Grein, M. E., Bennink, R. S., Dauler, E. A., Kerman, A. J., Molnar, R. J., & Wong, F. N. C. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043804 · Cited by 62
Portraying entanglement between molecular qubits with four-dimensional inelastic neutron scattering
Garlatti, E., Guidi, T., Ansbro, S., Santini, P. M., Amoretti, G., Ollivier, J., Mutka, H., Timco, G. A., Vitórica‐Yrezábal, Í. J., Whitehead, G. F. S., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14543 · Cited by 58
Long-distance distribution of genuine energy-time entanglement
Cuevas, Á., Carvacho, G., Saavedra, G., Cariñe, J., Nogueira, W. A. T., Figueroa, M. E., Cabello, A., Mataloni, P., Lima, G., & XAVIER, G. B. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3871 · Cited by 57
Exploring the Limits of Quantum Nonlocality with Entangled Photons
Christensen, B., Liang, Y.-C., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., & Kwiat, P. G. (2015) · Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000111571 · Cited by 57
Facets of bipartite nonlocality sharing by multiple observers via sequential measurements
Das, D., Ghosal, A., Sasmal, S., Mal, S., & Majumdar, A. S. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022305 · Cited by 57
Phonon-Trapping-Enhanced Energy Resolution in Superconducting Single-Photon Detectors
de Visser, P., de Rooij, S. A. H., Murugesan, V., Thoen, D. J., & Baselmans, J. J. A. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.034051 · Cited by 56
Death by experiment for local realism
Wiseman, H. M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15631 · Cited by 56
Directly comparing entanglement-enhancing non-Gaussian operations
Bartley, T. J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023038 · Cited by 54
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution: from idea towards application
Valivarthi, R., Lucio-Martinez, I., Chan, P., Rubenok, A., John, C., Korchinski, D. J., Duffin, C., Marsili, F., Verma, V. B., Shaw, M. D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2015.1021725 · Cited by 54
Self-citationThresholded Quantum LIDAR: Exploiting Photon-Number-Resolving Detection
Cohen, L., Matekole, E. S., Sher, Y., Istrati, D., Eisenberg, H. S., & Dowling, J. P. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.203601 · Cited by 52
Bell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole
Larsson, J.-Å., Giustina, M., Kofler, J., Wittmann, B., Ursin, R., & Ramelow, S. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032107 · Cited by 51
Self-citationTomography is Necessary for Universal Entanglement Detection with Single-Copy Observables
Lu, D., Xin, T., Yu, N., Ji, Z., Chen, J., Long, G., Baugh, J., Peng, X., Zeng, B., & Laflamme, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.230501 · Cited by 53
Förtsch, M., Schunk, G., Fürst, J. U., Strekalov, D., Gerrits, T., Stevens, M. J., Sedlmeir, F., Schwefel, H. G. L., Nam, S. W., Leuchs, G., et al. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.023812 · Cited by 53
Self-citationThe Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D. (2016) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416639702 · Cited by 57
Entanglement-based linear-optical qubit amplifier
Meyer-Scott, E., Bula, M., Bartkiewicz, K., Černoch, A., Soubusta, J., Jennewein, T. D., & Lemr, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.012327 · Cited by 51
Aerts, D., Arguëlles, J. A., Beltran, L., Geriente, S., de Bianchi, M. S., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2019) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/i2019-12987-0 · Cited by 48
Towards a realization of device-independent quantum key distribution
Murta, G., van Dam, S. B., Ribeiro, J., Hanson, R., & Wehner, S. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab2819 · Cited by 46
Pereira, M. D. C., Becerra, F. E., Glebov, B. L., Fan, J., Nam, S. W., & Migdall, A. L. (2013) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.38.001609 · Cited by 47
Self-citationGravity is not a pairwise local classical channel
Altamirano, N., Corona-Ugalde, P., Mann, R. B., & Zych, M. (2018) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac72f · Cited by 54
Device-independent quantum key distribution from generalized CHSH inequalities
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Valcarce, X., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., & Sangouard, N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-26-444 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Giustina, M., Mech, A., Ramelow, S., Wittmann, B., Kofler, J., Beyer, J., Lita, A., Calkins, B., Gerrits, T., Nam, S. W., Ursin, R., & Zeilinger, A.
- Affiliations
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Giustina, Marissa
- Zeilinger, Anton
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2013-04-14
- Volume
- 497
- Issue
- 7448
- Pages
- 227-230
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2009502003
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 35
- FWCI
- 50.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Nature Cell Biology
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- Austrian Science Fund
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (227844)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Keywords
- Bell inequality violation, entangled photons, local realism, transition edge sensors, photon pair sources, collection efficiency, quantum foundations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
