Cited by 399Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Impermanence of dendritic spines in live adult CA1 hippocampus

Open access
Attardo, Alessio, Fitzgerald, James E., Schnitzer, Mark J.·2015·Nature

Abstract

The mammalian hippocampus is crucial for episodic memory formation and transiently retains information for about 3-4 weeks in adult mice and longer in humans. Although neuroscientists widely believe that neural synapses are elemental sites of information storage, there has been no direct evidence that hippocampal synapses persist for time intervals commensurate with the duration of hippocampal-dependent memory. Here we tested the prediction that the lifetimes of hippocampal synapses match the longevity of hippocampal memory. By using time-lapse two-photon microendoscopy in the CA1 hippocampal area of live mice, we monitored the turnover dynamics of the pyramidal neurons' basal dendritic spines, postsynaptic structures whose turnover dynamics are thought to reflect those of excitatory synaptic connections. Strikingly, CA1 spine turnover dynamics differed sharply from those seen previously in the neocortex. Mathematical modelling revealed that the data best matched kinetic models with a single population of spines with a mean lifetime of approximately 1-2 weeks. This implies ∼100% turnover in ∼2-3 times this interval, a near full erasure of the synaptic connectivity pattern. Although N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade stabilizes spines in the neocortex, in CA1 it transiently increased the rate of spine loss and thus lowered spine density. These results reveal that adult neocortical and hippocampal pyramidal neurons have divergent patterns of spine regulation and quantitatively support the idea that the transience of hippocampal-dependent memory directly reflects the turnover dynamics of hippocampal synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature14467

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A substantial portion of dendritic spines on CA1 pyramidal cells turn over within a few weeks.

    “Perhaps even more problematic is the report that a substantial portion of dendritic spines on CA1 pyramidal cells turn over within a few weeks (416, 417).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [416]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attardo, A., Fitzgerald, J. E., & Schnitzer, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Schnitzer, Mark J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-06-22
Volume
523
Issue
7562
Pages
592-596
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1655792606
Cited by
399
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 7
FWCI
16.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG038771)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH092809)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampal CA1, synaptic plasticity, episodic memory, NMDA receptor, pyramidal neurons, synaptic connectivity, microendoscopy, spine density, adult mice, NMDA receptor blockade
MeSH terms
Animals, Endoscopy, Kinetics, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Time Factors, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Photons, Pyramidal Cells, Neocortex, Dendritic Spines, Mice, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review