The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies
Abstract
A sense of fairness plays a critical role in supporting human cooperation. Adult norms of fair resource sharing vary widely across societies, suggesting that culture shapes the acquisition of fairness behaviour during childhood. Here we examine how fairness behaviour develops in children from seven diverse societies, testing children from 4 to 15 years of age (n = 866 pairs) in a standardized resource decision task. We measured two key aspects of fairness decisions: disadvantageous inequity aversion (peer receives more than self) and advantageous inequity aversion (self receives more than a peer). We show that disadvantageous inequity aversion emerged across all populations by middle childhood. By contrast, advantageous inequity aversion was more variable, emerging in three populations and only later in development. We discuss these findings in relation to questions about the universality and cultural specificity of human fairness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, [40] compared the acquisition of fairness behaviour in seven different societies: Canada, India, Mexico, Peru, Senegal, Uganda, and the USA, and found that while children from all cultures developed aversion towards disadvantageous inequity (avoid receiving less than a peer), advantageous inequity aversion (avoid receiving more than a peer) was more prevalent in the West.”
From Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
WEIRD languages have misled us, too
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1000018x · Cited by 4,177
Antisocial Punishment Across Societies
Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153808 · Cited by 2,038
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
Costly Punishment Across Human Societies
Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127333 · Cited by 1,771
Egalitarianism in young children
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07155 · Cited by 1,540
Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R. L., Barr, A. M., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cárdenas, J.-C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E. L. M., Henrich, N. S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182238 · Cited by 1,424
Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts.
Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.426 · Cited by 1,122
Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality
Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.003 · Cited by 739
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–540 of 540
Foti, F., Costanzo, F., Fabrizio, C., Termine, A., Menghini, D., Iaquinta, T., Vicari, S., Petrosini, L., & Blake, P. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26944602
Self-citationFoti, F., Costanzo, F., Fabrizio, C., Termine, A., Menghini, D., Iaquinta, T., Vicari, S., Petrosini, L., & Blake, P. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26944599
Self-citationFoti, F., Costanzo, F., Fabrizio, C., Termine, A., Menghini, D., Iaquinta, T., Vicari, S., Petrosini, L., & Blake, P. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26944605
Self-citationDevelopmental asymmetries in learning to adjust to cooperative and uncooperative environmentsPreprint
van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Molleman, L., van den Bos, W., Viding, E. M., & Westhoff, B. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
The role of social comparison and emotion in children’s fairness judgments
Stowe, L. M., Wilson, Z. H., Yu, E., Peretz‐Lange, R., & Blake, P. R. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106449
Self-citationOrigins of understanding fair resource collection
Radovanovic, M., Hwang, J., Sobel, D. M., & Sommerville, J. A. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106434
The emergence of disadvantageous inequity aversion between 2–4 years
Hernandez, F. S., & Hyde, D. C. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106464
The development of bribe-taking aversion in four societies
Reyes-Jaquez, B., Margoni, F., & Moriguchi, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.2523
Resource value influences distributive justice behaviors of three- to five-year-old Chinese children
Cheng, T., Lin, Q., & Fu, H. C. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08739-2
“On one hand, the findings of Choshen-Hillel et al. (2019) are contrary to those of Blake et al. (2015), who found that the value of resources had no effect on chil - dren’s distributive justice behavior.”
Children’s resource taking varies with experimentally manipulated relative status
Berelejis, C., Ritov, O., Engelmann, J. M., & Benozio, A. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-40976-8
Charity or Solidarity? How Donor Motives Shape Third-Party Perceptions of GivingPreprint
Trenfield, M., Szanton, E. C., Piecyk, N., & Young, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6335971
Eliciting time, risk, and social preferences in children: a validated survey
Willadsen, H., & Piovesan, M. (2025) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1017/eec.2026.10041
“Panel (c) displays altruism: children donate, on average, 19% of their endowment, which is lower than in Harbaugh and Krause (2000), Bettinger and Slonim (2006), and Blake et al. (2015), who report average donations of 29%, 27%, and 25%, respectively.”
Yapay Zekâ Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşımlar
Yıldırım, B. F. (2023) · DSpace@29 Mayıs
Using facial cues to produce social decisions. A cognitive and evolutionary approach
Safra, L. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/47319474zdbe9z43fdzaf6ezc6d9d29319c0 · Cited by 1
Comportements pro-sociaux et aversion à l'iniquité
Falco, A. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e58143a4z8f99z4ae1za913zf7f3ba788a16
Santiago, R. E., Smith-Flores, A. S., Pesowski, M. L., & Schachner, A. (2026) · Child Development · doi:10.1093/chidev/aacag068
“No Fair!”: Children’s Perceptions of Fairness in Merit-Based Distributions
Yucel, M., Brence, M., & Vaish, A. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16040617
“…contingent: Cross-cultural work shows variability in children’s responses to both equality-and merit-based unfairness, with children from Western societies placing greater emphasis on merit than those from egalitarian societies (Blake et al., 2015; Engelmann et al., 2021; Schäfer et al., 2015).”
The ontogeny of children's social emotions in response to (un)fairness.Preprint
Hepach, R., Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., Haun, D., & Gerdemann, S. C. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Self-citationBicchieri, C., Dimant, E., Apicella, C., Smith, K. M., & Stibbard‐Hawkes, D. N. E. (2026) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Growing up in an age of economic inequality: A social-cognitive developmental framework
Brummelman, E., McAuliffe, K., & Amemiya, J. L. (2026) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2026.08.002
Self-citationDavis, M. S. (2026) · doi:10.1017/9781108777636.009
Children in Kenya and the US are averse to epistemic injustice
Jacobs, C., Ritov, O., Chau, E., Njogu, N., Srinivasan, M., Zeidler, H., & Engelmann, J. M. (2026) · Child Development · doi:10.1093/chidev/aacag085
Differentiating Social and Moral Norms in Perceived Internalization
Deutchman, P., & Yang, F. Y. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16050774
“…indicates that harm norms emerge within the first two years of life, whereas fairness norms typically emerge later, around ages five to six (Blake et al., 2015; McAuliffe et al., 2017; House, 2018), while cross-cultural research indicates that harm norms are less culturally variable than…”
Malin, Y., & Sabato, H. (2026) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.70105
“Research on prosociality among children points to sociocultural variation (Blake et al., 2015; Callaghan & Corbit, 2018; Marshall et al., 2022).”
Aktas, B. E., & Cesur, S. (2026) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2026.2689112
Beyond resources: Children in India and Germany have a multifaceted concept of fairness
Yilmaz, S., Sunderarajan, J., Hepach, R., & Kanngießer, P. (2026) · Child Development · doi:10.1093/chidev/aacag110
Stable intuition and the rise of deliberative prosociality in childhood
Margoni, F., Nava, F., Sotis, C., Levy, M. R., Capraro, V., & Nava, E. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02487-4 · Cited by 3
“…point for comparison, prosocial development can vary substantially Article https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02487-4 across cultural contexts 86–89 , and we therefore refrain from making broad generalizations, leaving open the question of how the current results extend to other populations.”
InfluentialExtrinsic incentives can shape inequity aversion in primary school children
Lei, W., Zhong, X., Gao, H., & Qi, M. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106603
A Developmental Science Framework for Investigating Conceptions of Social Inequalities
Killen, M., Forbes, M. B., & Grütter, J. (2026) · Social development (Oxford. Print) · doi:10.1111/sode.70084
The emotional foundations of human prosociality
Vaish, A., & Shu, Y. (2026) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2026.07.004
БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ОСНОВАНИЯ ЭТИКИ И МОРАЛИ
СТРОЕВ, С. А. (2026) · Reputaciologiâ. · doi:10.34925/2071-9094.2026.79.1.004
Cowell, J. M., Nehrkorn-Bailey, A. M., Gauri, V., Jamison, J., Millien, M., Roth, E., Sisokhom, S., & Jean Decety, A. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106640
Pan, X., Shi, Z., Guo, X., Liu, X., & Su, Y. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16081422
“This pattern suggests that children flexibly adjust their responses based on the target’s social strategy and resource, indicating an early form of context-sensitive social responses (Blake et al., 2015; Engelmann & Tomasello, 2019; Kenward & Dahl, 2011).”
Is Bad Luck Unfair? Children’s and Adults’ Judgments of Non-Agentic InequalityPreprint
Zeng, N., & Bloom, P. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7450760
Measuring structural value alignment in sixteen models: LLMs have human-like moral spaces
Tang, Y. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01368-w
“Children reliably distinguish unfair treatment from harmful outcomes only around age 6 to 8, and the full sensitivity to advantageous inequity develops even later and varies cross-culturally [ 21, 22].”
Children from six cultures reliably help their peers—but in different ways
Zeidler, H., Schäfer, M., Herrmann, E., Kanngießer, P., Maurits, L., Haun, D. B. M., & Tomasello, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2515233123
“…differences later on (32), we were expecting to see similar rates and types of helping at the lower end of our age range, and more nuanced responses in older children—which is also when more strategic behaviors have been shown to emerge (27), especially when prosocial behaviors come at a cost (33).”
Advancing Research on the Origins of Judgment and Decision-Making
Santhanagopalan, R., Echelbarger, M., Risen, J. L., & Kinzler, K. D. (2026) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2026.2724090
“…as inequity aversion, efficiency-equity trade-offs, and the identifiable victim effect afforded developmental researchers a vocabulary and formal paradigms for studying these phenomena in children (Blake et al., 2015; Choshen-Hillel et al., 2020; Kogut, 2012; Kogut et al., 2016; Shaw et al., 2016).”
The developmental origins of egalitarianism
Rivero, A., & Amir, D. (2026) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x26105822
Beyond egalitarian societies: Egalitarianism as a human universal
Stibbard‐Hawkes, D. N. E., & Rueden, C. R. V. (2026) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x26106931
Beliefs About Social Mobility Across Childhood
Mandalaywala, T. M., & Tian, Y. (2026) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214261478590
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., Corbit, J., Callaghan, T. C., Barry, O., Bowie, A., Kleutsch, L., Kramer, K. L., Ross, E., Vongsachang, H., Wrangham, R., & Warneken, F.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
- Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blake, P. R.
- McAuliffe, K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-11-18
- Volume
- 528
- Issue
- 7581
- Pages
- 258-261
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2177707862
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 96.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- fairness, ontogeny, children, cultural variation, resource sharing, cooperation, developmental timing, cross-cultural comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Cooperative Behavior, Culture, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Social Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
